THE ACIT, CIRCLE- 1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. SMT. MANISHABEN N. MASHRU,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Shri Rajpal Yadavsr.No.

section 68 of the Act contemplates where any sum is found credited in the books of an assessee maintained for any previous year, and the assessee offers no explanation about the nature and source thereof, or the explanation offered by the assessee is not, in the opinion of the AO satisfactory, then the sum so credited in the accounts

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR. TDS,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S CLASSIC NETWORK PVT. LTD.,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.628/Rjt/2014 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2012-13 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.375/Rjt/2015 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2013-14 M/S. Classic Network Pvt. Ltd., D.C.I.T., 202, Arpan Complex, Opp. Vs. Tds Circle, Swaminarayan Mandir, Rajkot. Kalavad Road, Rajkot. Pan: Aabcc8197Q

Section Default Amt. Interest Total Payment 1. Contract 194C r.w.s 9,25,50,559 3,33,18,201 12,58,68

THE DY. COMMR. INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S CLASSIC NETWORK PVT. LTD.,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.628/Rjt/2014 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2012-13 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.375/Rjt/2015 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2013-14 M/S. Classic Network Pvt. Ltd., D.C.I.T., 202, Arpan Complex, Opp. Vs. Tds Circle, Swaminarayan Mandir, Rajkot. Kalavad Road, Rajkot. Pan: Aabcc8197Q

Section Default Amt. Interest Total Payment 1. Contract 194C r.w.s 9,25,50,559 3,33,18,201 12,58,68

GRENIC TILES PRIVATE LIMITED,WANKANER-MORBI vs. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE 1(1) RKT, RAJKOT

The appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas\nappeal of the revenue is dismissed

section 68 of the Act.\nReliance is further placed on the decision of the ITAT, Mumbai Bench in\nthe case of ITO vs. Surana Traders, (2005)93 TTJ 875: (2005)92 ITD 212,\nthe relevant observation of the Mumbai Bench are as under:\n\"So merely because for the reasons that the purchaser parties were not traceable, the\nassessee

ACIT CIRCLE-1(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. GRENIC TILES PVT LTD, MORBI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas\nappeal of the revenue is dismissed

section 68 of the Act.\nReliance is further placed on the decision of the ITAT, Mumbai Bench in\nthe case of ITO vs. Surana Traders, (2005)93 TTJ 875: (2005)92 ITD 212,\nthe relevant observation of the Mumbai Bench are as under:\n\"So merely because for the reasons that the purchaser parties were not traceable, the\nassessee

VISHAL ENTERPRISE, ,JAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3,, JAMNAGAR.

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr.

68,692/- whose fine under section 234E was determined at Rs.12,48,800/- on the basis of number of days calculated by the AO. However, in the case of Rakesh B. Ladha, TCS was Rs.68,656/-. Penalty was restricted equivalent to this amount. Similar exercise was carried out in respect of other assessees. Dissatisfied with this levy of penalty

RAKESH BASANTILAL LADDHA,,JAMNAGAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3,, JAMNAGAR.

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr.

68,692/- whose fine under section 234E was determined at Rs.12,48,800/- on the basis of number of days calculated by the AO. However, in the case of Rakesh B. Ladha, TCS was Rs.68,656/-. Penalty was restricted equivalent to this amount. Similar exercise was carried out in respect of other assessees. Dissatisfied with this levy of penalty

JAYESHBHAI KANJIBHAI DANGARIYA,,JAMNAGAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3,, JAMNAGAR.

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr.

68,692/- whose fine under section 234E was determined at Rs.12,48,800/- on the basis of number of days calculated by the AO. However, in the case of Rakesh B. Ladha, TCS was Rs.68,656/-. Penalty was restricted equivalent to this amount. Similar exercise was carried out in respect of other assessees. Dissatisfied with this levy of penalty

PARAG MAKANBHAI PARSANA,JAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3,, JAMNAGAR.

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr.

68,692/- whose fine under section 234E was determined at Rs.12,48,800/- on the basis of number of days calculated by the AO. However, in the case of Rakesh B. Ladha, TCS was Rs.68,656/-. Penalty was restricted equivalent to this amount. Similar exercise was carried out in respect of other assessees. Dissatisfied with this levy of penalty

SMT. KRUSHNABA PRAVINSINH JADEJA,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-1(1),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

201, 2nd\nFloor, Opera Tower, Jawahar Road,\nRajkot-360 001\n(Assessee)\n(Respondent)\nआयकर अपील सं./ITA No.577/RJT/2015\n(निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2012-13)\nDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax,\nCircle-1(1), Rajkot, Aaykar Bhavan, Race\nVs.\nKrushnaba Pravinsinh Jadeja,\nC.o. R.K. Shukla & Co.,\nCourse Ring Road, Rajkot-360 001\n201, 2nd Floor, Opera Tower,\nJawahar Road, Rajkot

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-1(1), RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. SMT. KRUSHNABA P. JADEJA,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

201, 2nd Floor, Opera Tower, Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 001 Jawahar Road, Rajkot-360001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: ACYPJ 6178 N (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld. AR Respondent by : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 03/06/2025 Date of Pronouncement : 30/07/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per, Dr. A. L. Saini, AM: Captioned

THE DCIT, CIRCLE TDS,, RAJKOT vs. M\S. APRICOT FOODS PVT. LTD. , METODA, DIST. RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 194C of the Act and the assessee failed to Deduct Tax at Source (TDS). Therefore the Assessing Officer passed an order u/s. 201(1) of the Act treating the assessee in default for non-TDS an amount of Rs. 46,68

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD-2, , GANDHIDHAM - KUTCH vs. M/S. RIDDHI SIDDHI JEWELLERS, GANDHIDHAM - KUTCH

In the result, appeal of the Revenue isdismissed

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Smt. Madhumita Royassessment Year :2014-15 Ito, Ward-2 Vs. M/S.Riddhi Siddhi Jewellers Gandhidham. Shop No.1, Plot No.68 Bba (Sough) Gandhidham-Kutch. 0 अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/(Respondent) Assessee By : Shri D.M. Rindani, Ar Revenue By : Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 11/04/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 05/07/2023

201 ITR 747 (Cal) for the same proposition. 7. The ld. AR further submitted that if there is a positive figure under the head 'business' then it has to be necessarily aggregated with the deemed income under section 69A, 69B & 69C for working out gross total income from which allowable deductions under Chapter-VIA are reduced and thereafter total

SHRI GIRISHBHAI NANJIBHAI SOLANKI,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2), RAJKOT

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed partly for the statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy

section 68 of the Act. 20.3 The facts in brief are that during the survey proceedings dated 09-12-2014 at the premises of M/s Bhavani Energy Solutions Pvt. Ltd wherein the assessee is director, a diary belonging to assessee was found. The page No. 119 of the impugned diary was containing detail of cash payment

PANKAJKUMAR CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAKJOT vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

201/-,\nin respect of various additions made by the assessing officer. Thereafter, in 092-\nR/CC-2/2017-18, dated 04/02/2019, of order of CIT(A)-11, Ahmedabad, the\nfollowing additions are confirmed, on which penalty u/s 271AAB is proposed to\nlevy:\n(i) Addition of Rs.1,80,000/ made on account of deemed Rent of more\nthan one properties, reflected in balance sheet

PANKAJKUMAR CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAKJOT vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

201/-, in\nrespect of various additions made by the assessing officer. Thereafter, in 092-\nR/CC-2/2017-18, dated 04/02/2019, of order of CIT(A)-11, Ahmedabad, the\nfollowing additions are confirmed, on which penalty u/s 271AAB is proposed to\nlevy:\n(i) Addition of Rs.1,80,000/ made on account of deemed Rent of more\nthan one properties, reflected in balance sheet

PANKAJKUMAR CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ACTIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

201/-, in\nrespect of various additions made by the assessing officer. Thereafter, in 092-\nR/CC-2/2017-18, dated 04/02/2019, of order of CIT(A)-11, Ahmedabad, the\nfollowing additions are confirmed, on which penalty u/s 271AAB is proposed to\nlevy:\n(i) Addition of Rs.1,80,000/ made on account of deemed Rent of more\nthan one properties, reflected in balance sheet

PANKAJKUMAR CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

201/-, in\nrespect of various additions made by the assessing officer. Thereafter, in 092-\nR/CC-2/2017-18, dated 04/02/2019, of order of CIT(A)-11, Ahmedabad, the\nfollowing additions are confirmed, on which penalty u/s 271AAB is proposed to\nlevy:\n(i) Addition of Rs.1,80,000/ made on account of deemed Rent of more\nthan one properties, reflected in balance sheet

PANKAJ CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

201/-, in\nrespect of various additions made by the assessing officer. Thereafter, in 092-\nR/CC-2/2017-18, dated 04/02/2019, of order of CIT(A)-11, Ahmedabad, the\nfollowing additions are confirmed, on which penalty u/s 271AAB is proposed to\nlevy:\n(i) Addition of Rs.1,80,000/ made on account of deemed Rent of more\nthan one properties, reflected in balance sheet