BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 113clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi345Mumbai222Chennai175Hyderabad98Jaipur82Bangalore78Chandigarh58Kolkata54Raipur43Ahmedabad37Guwahati33Amritsar25Pune22Allahabad20Surat17Indore15Cuttack12Patna12Lucknow10Nagpur10Dehradun9Jodhpur8Rajkot6Agra3Jabalpur2Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 1489Section 2503Section 1472

MOHAN HARDASMAL TAHILYANI,GANDHIDHAM vs. INCOMETAX OFFICER WARD 1 GANDHIDHAM, GANDHIDHAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 176/RJT/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Aug 2025AY 2015-16
Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250

113, NU-3, Apna Nagar,\nGandhidham-\n370201(Gujarat)\nVs.\nIncome Tax Officer,\nNational Faceless Assessment Centre/\nWard-1, Gandhidham, Income Tax\nOffice, Plot No.32, Sector 3, Near IFFCO\nColony, Gandhidham-370201\nस्थायी लेखासं./जी आइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AFOPT 2722 B\n(Appellant)\nAppellant by\nRespondent by\nDate of Hearing\nDate of Pronouncement\nPer, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini AM\n(Respondent

SHRI BHARATKUMAR IASHWARBHAI BHATIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRL-1,, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue, in ITA No

ITA 44/RJT/2023[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 134 & 135/Rjt/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2007-08 & 2008-09) Income Tax Officer, Ward- Shri Kherajmal Lekhrajbjai 5Th 1(2)(1), Aaykar Bhavan, Thavrani, 4- Parsana Nagar, Shri Vs. Floor, Room No. 517, Race Vaheguru Grupa, Near Refugee Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 Colony, Rajkot-360 001 001 "थायी लेखा सं./जी आइ आर सं./Pan/Gir No.: Adrpt 5807 E (Appellant) (Respondent)

113 ITD 0377 (Del-Trib) b. Namdeo Arora (2016) 72 taxmann.com 124 (P&H) c. Shri Arif v ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITA No 976/Bang/2022 d. Dr Prakash Tiwari vs CIT (1983) 14 taxman 252 (MP) e. Rajmeet Singh vs ITO, (2024) 160 taxmann.com 83 (Jharkhand) 3. That in addition to the deeming provisions, the Act requires taxation of profits from

SHRI BHARATKUMAR IASHWARBHAI BHATIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2),, RAJKOT

ITA 46/RJT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

113 ITD 0377 (Del-Trib)\nb. Namdeo Arora (2016) 72 taxmann.com 124 (P&H)\nC. Shri Arif v ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITA No 976/Bang/2022\nd. Dr Prakash Tiwari vs CIT (1983) 14 taxman 252 (MP)\ne. Rajmeet Singh vs ITO, (2024) 160 taxmann.com 83 (Jharkhand)\n3. That in addition to the deeming provisions, the Act requires taxation of profits from

SHRI DAMJIBHAI LEKHRAJBHAI THAVRANI,,JUNAGADH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD 1(2)(4),, RAJKOT

ITA 16/RJT/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2010-11

113 ITD 0377 (Del-Trib)\nb. Namdeo Arora (2016) 72 taxmann.com 124 (P&H)\nC. Shri Arif v ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITA No 976/Bang/2022\nd. Dr Prakash Tiwari vs CIT (1983) 14 taxman 252 (MP)\ne. Rajmeet Singh vs ITO, (2024) 160 taxmann.com 83 (Jharkhand)\n3. That in addition to the deeming provisions, the Act requires taxation of profits from

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CEN. CIR.-1,, RAJKOT vs. BHARATKUMAR ISHWARBHAI BHATIYA,, RAJKOT

ITA 49/RJT/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

113 ITD 0377 (Del-Trib)\nb. Namdeo Arora (2016) 72 taxmann.com 124 (P&H)\nC.\nShri Arif v ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITA No 976/Bang/2022\nd. Dr Prakash Tiwari vs CIT (1983) 14 taxman 252 (MP)\ne. Rajmeet Singh vs ITO, (2024) 160 taxmann.com 83 (Jharkhand)\n3. That in addition to the deeming provisions, the Act requires taxation of profits from

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD-2,, JUNAGADH vs. SHRI DAMJIBHAI LEKHRAJBHAI THAVRANI,, JUNAGADH

ITA 31/RJT/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2009-10

113 ITD 0377 (Del-Trib)\nb. Namdeo Arora (2016) 72 taxmann.com 124 (P&H)\nC. Shri Arif v ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITA No 976/Bang/2022\nd. Dr Prakash Tiwari vs CIT (1983) 14 taxman 252 (MP)\ne. Rajmeet Singh vs ITO, (2024) 160 taxmann.com 83 (Jharkhand)\n3. That in addition to the deeming provisions, the Act requires taxation of profits from