BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur47Bangalore18Indore16Surat10Chandigarh10Pune7Ahmedabad7Mumbai6Chennai5Delhi4Cochin3Hyderabad3Allahabad2Raipur2Rajkot2Kolkata1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 1472Penalty2

SHRI DAMJIBHAI LEKHRAJBHAI THAVRANI,,JUNAGADH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD 1(2)(4),, RAJKOT

ITA 16/RJT/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2010-11

u/s 263 of the Act, and directed the assessing officer to verify the source of cash deposited in the bank accounts, which have been left out, during the course of original assessment proceedings. Accordingly, assessing officer made addition of peak credit in individual bank accounts. However, on further appeal by assessee, before

ASHOKBHAI MAHADEVBHAI CHAVDA,SURENDRANAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, SURENDRANAGAR, SURENDRANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 47/RJT/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot07 Apr 2025AY 2012-13
Section 139Section 144Section 147Section 234A
Section 250
Section 271(1)(c)
Section 274
Section 69B

section 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the\nAct"), vide order dated 25.12.2019.\n2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as follows:\n1. The Ld. CIT(A) is grossly erred in passing the order u/s 250 of the Act,\ndismissing the appeal filed by the appellant and confirming the addition of\n28.38.600