Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 271D(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi71 Indore52 Jaipur47 Hyderabad41 Chennai27 Mumbai27 Pune23 Bangalore22 Visakhapatnam15 Cochin10 Kolkata9 Ahmedabad7 Rajkot7 Nagpur6 Chandigarh4 Amritsar2 Raipur2 Cuttack2 Jodhpur1 Surat1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(b)25 Penalty7 Section 269T6 Section 271D6 Section 271E5 Section 269S5 Addition to Income5 Section 2712

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, all the five appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

ITA 131/RJT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot03 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 271(1)(b)

u/s. 144 assessment order is deleted by the Ld. CIT(A). Thus, the grievance made out by the assessee is found to be genuine and reasonable. In the above circumstances the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(b) in our considered opinion is unwarranted. For better understanding Section 271(1)(b) and 273B are extracted below: “271

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, all the five appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

ITA 133/RJT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot03 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

LOVE SHOPPERS LTD,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(2), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

LOVE SHOPPERS LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. ADD. CIT, RANGE -2(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD