BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “house property”+ Section 148Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai57Mumbai56Delhi24Jaipur23Bangalore16Pune16Visakhapatnam12Chandigarh11Ahmedabad10Raipur8Rajkot7Indore6Hyderabad6Bombay5Lucknow5Agra5Kolkata2Surat1Amritsar1Guwahati1Cochin1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 14711Section 14810Addition to Income7Section 2504Section 143(3)4Section 133A4Section 148A4Survey u/s 133A4Section 693Limitation/Time-bar

MITESHKUMAR DAYALJIBHAI PABARI,BHATIYA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER , RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed, for statistical purposes, in above terms

ITA 420/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 420 /Rjt/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2020-21) Miteshkumar Dayaljibhai Pabari Assistant Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner, International C/O Dayaljibhai Pabari, Shreeji Catlery Vs. Taxation Rajkot, Stores, Main Bajar, Bhatiya, Devbhoomi Dwarka, Room No. 312, Income Tax Office, Amruta Estate Building, Near Girnar Dwarka-361315(Gujarat) Cinema, M.G. Road, Rajkot – 360001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bctpp7290M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Mahesh Paun, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 274
2
Unexplained Investment2
Section 69

section 147 r.w.s. 144C(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). 2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assesse are as follows: (1) Learned A.O. erred in law as well facts in making addition of Rs. 78,69,694/- as unexplained investment u/s 69 r.w.s 115BBE and passing order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144C

MINABEN SUDHIRBHAI SOMPURA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO WARD-1 , SURENDRANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 55/RJT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot09 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Hem Chhajad, Ld. A.R
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 69

section 148A(b) of the Act. Minaben S. Sompura 3. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in upholding addition made by the Ld. A.O. to the extent of Rs. 9,50,000/- U/S 69 of the Act. 4. The appellant Craves liberty to add, amend, after or modify all or any grounds of appeal before

SIX TWENTY REALTY PVT LTD,RAJOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 787/RJT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2020-21
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

148A(b) of the Act and\nafter obtaining necessary approval of the specified authority as defined u/s 151 of\nthe Act. Notice u/s 148 of the Act along with order u/ s148A(d) of the Act was\nissued and served upon the assessee on 30.03.2023. In reply to the notice u/s 148,\nan Income-tax Return has been filed

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. SIX TWENTY REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED, RAJKOT

ITA 765/RJT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2019-20
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

148A(b) of the Act and\nafter obtaining necessary approval of the specified authority as defined u/s 151 of\nthe Act. Notice u/s 148 of the Act along with order u/ s148A(d) of the Act was\nissued and served upon the assessee on 30.03.2023. In reply to the notice u/s 148,\nan Income-tax Return has been filed

SIX TWENTY REALTY PVT. LTD.,RAJKOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 786/RJT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2019-20
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

148A(b) of the Act and\nafter obtaining necessary approval of the specified authority as defined u/s 151 of\nthe Act. Notice u/s 148 of the Act along with order u/ s148A(d) of the Act was\nissued and served upon the assessee on 30.03.2023. In reply to the notice u/s 148,\nan Income-tax Return has been filed

SIX TWENTY REALTY PVT. LTD.,RAJKOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 785/RJT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

148A(b) of the Act and Page 3 of 28 ITA Nos. 785 to 787 & 765/Rjt/2024 Six Twenty Realty Pvt. Ltd. after obtaining necessary approval of the specified authority as defined u/s 151 of the Act. Notice u/s 148 of the Act along with order u/ s148A(d) of the Act was issued and served upon the assessee

RUPA VIMAL PADALIYA,RAJKOT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 821/RJT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot09 Jun 2025AY 2018-19
Section 147Section 148Section 69

section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short \"the\nAct\"), vide order dated 27.03.2023.\n2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as follows:\n1. The grounds of appeal mentioned hereunder are without prejudice to one\nanother.\n2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal\nCentre, Delhi (hereinafter referred