MINABEN SUDHIRBHAI SOMPURA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO WARD-1 , SURENDRANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

section 148A(b) of the Act. Minaben S. Sompura 3. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in upholding addition made by the Ld. A.O. to the extent of Rs. 9,50,000/- U/S 69 of the Act. 4. The appellant Craves liberty to add, amend, after or modify all or any grounds of appeal before

SIX TWENTY REALTY PVT LTD,RAJOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

148A(b) of the Act and\nafter obtaining necessary approval of the specified authority as defined u/s 151 of\nthe Act. Notice u/s 148 of the Act along with order u/ s148A(d) of the Act was\nissued and served upon the assessee on 30.03.2023. In reply to the notice u/s 148,\nan Income-tax Return has been filed

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. SIX TWENTY REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED, RAJKOT

148A(b) of the Act and\nafter obtaining necessary approval of the specified authority as defined u/s 151 of\nthe Act. Notice u/s 148 of the Act along with order u/ s148A(d) of the Act was\nissued and served upon the assessee on 30.03.2023. In reply to the notice u/s 148,\nan Income-tax Return has been filed

SIX TWENTY REALTY PVT. LTD.,RAJKOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

148A(b) of the Act and\nafter obtaining necessary approval of the specified authority as defined u/s 151 of\nthe Act. Notice u/s 148 of the Act along with order u/ s148A(d) of the Act was\nissued and served upon the assessee on 30.03.2023. In reply to the notice u/s 148,\nan Income-tax Return has been filed

SIX TWENTY REALTY PVT. LTD.,RAJKOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

148A(b) of the Act and Page 3 of 28 ITA Nos. 785 to 787 & 765/Rjt/2024 Six Twenty Realty Pvt. Ltd. after obtaining necessary approval of the specified authority as defined u/s 151 of the Act. Notice u/s 148 of the Act along with order u/ s148A(d) of the Act was issued and served upon the assessee