BHARAT NARSHIBHAI PATEL,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 516/RJT/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot02 Jun 2020AY 2010-11
Bench: Us.
For Appellant: Written SubmissionFor Respondent: Shri Suhas Mistry, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 271CSection 40Section 40(8)
disallowance. Indeed the said provision though inserted by the Finance Act
2012 w.e.f. 1-4-2013 but the same has been held to be retrospective in operation by recent judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT v. Ansal Land Mark Township (P) Ltd. (2015) 61 taxmann.com 45 (Del) wherein the question raised before