JITESHBHAI RAMNIKLAL NAGADA,JAMNAGAR vs. ITO, WARD 2(6), JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

In the result, both appeals filed by the assessees, are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.39/Rjt/2025 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2014-15) Kantaben Ramniklal Nagda Vs. Ito, Wd- 2(6), Jamnagar Flat No. 603, K D Tower, Oswal Aayakar Bhavan, Nr. Subhash Bridge, Colony, Jamnagar Rajkot Highway, Jamnagar-361004 Jamnagar - 361001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Agtpn7366D (Assessee) (Respondent)

1. Hon'ble CIT (Appeals) erred in law by confirming addition made by Ld A.O. of Rs. 8,34,694/- u/s 56(vii)(b)(ii) without considering the fact that the land ITA Nos. 39 & 46/RJT/2025 Jiteshbhai R. Nagada vs. ITO purchased is Rural Agricultural Land which is not capital asset as per provisions of section 2(14). Hence, Section

SHRI NARENDRA DHARAMDAS GIDWANI,ANJAR KUTCH vs. THE ADDL. CIT, NFAC, , NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 220/Rjt/2023 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2015-16) (Hybrid Hearing) Narendra Dharamdas Gidwani, The Commissioner Of Income Vs. Plot No. 29, Survey No. 193/1, Maitru Tax(Appeals), Residency Meghpar Borichi, Anjar, National Faceless Appeal Centre Kutch, (Nfac), Delhi, Income Tax Gujarat - 370110 Department, Ministry Of Finance, Government Of India "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Akmpg6386M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Chiranjeev Tandon, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 26/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 09/06/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per D. M. Sinha, Jm:

condoned the delay. Narendra D. Gidwani 7. Brief facts of the case that the Appellant is on individual assessee employed with the private company. The Appellant is a salaried person and have been filing return of income regularly. The appellant filed return of income for assessment year 2015-16 on September 4, 2015. Thereafter, the assessing officer issued Notice under

M/S. FRIENDS SALT WORKS & ALIED INDUSTRIES,,GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE , RAJKOT

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for assessment year

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

delay is hereby being condoned. 5. The brief facts of the case are that the survey under section 133A of the Act was carried out at the office premises of the assessee on 28-11-2014 for verification of TDS compliance. The assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of manufacturing of salt, providing liquid storage tank

M/S. FRIENDS SALT WORKS & ALIED INDUSTRIES,,GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE , RAJKOT

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for assessment year

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

delay is hereby being condoned. 5. The brief facts of the case are that the survey under section 133A of the Act was carried out at the office premises of the assessee on 28-11-2014 for verification of TDS compliance. The assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of manufacturing of salt, providing liquid storage tank

SHRI BHARATKUMAR IASHWARBHAI BHATIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRL-1,, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue, in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 134 & 135/Rjt/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2007-08 & 2008-09) Income Tax Officer, Ward- Shri Kherajmal Lekhrajbjai 5Th 1(2)(1), Aaykar Bhavan, Thavrani, 4- Parsana Nagar, Shri Vs. Floor, Room No. 517, Race Vaheguru Grupa, Near Refugee Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 Colony, Rajkot-360 001 001 "थायी लेखा सं./जी आइ आर सं./Pan/Gir No.: Adrpt 5807 E (Appellant) (Respondent)

36,628/- 51,69,18,800/- VI Bharat I Bhatia 2012-13 177,72,01,183/- 53,31,60,355/- 124,40,40,828/- VII Bharat I Bhatia 2013-14 58,46,25,710/- 17,53,87,713 40,92,37,997/- The A.O. is directed to consider the income of the above-mentioned cases as determined above. Thus

THE ACIT, CEN. CIR.-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. EXPERT PARTICLE BOARD, MORBI

In the result, cross objection filed by the assessee, ( in CO No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं /.Ita No.139/Rjt/2021 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-2020 Asstt.Commissioner Of Income-Tax Expert Particle Board बनाम Cent.Cir.2, Rajkot. Survey No.111, 8-A National Vs. Highway B/H. Bharatinagar Iti, Ravapar Nadi Morbi 363 642. Pan : Aahfe 0299 G आयकर अपील सं /.Ita No.142/Rjt/2021 With Cross Objection No.05/Rjt/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-2020 Asstt.Commissioner Of Income-Tax Bhagvaji Prabhubhai बनाम Cent.Cir.2, Rajkot. Amrutiya, Meera Park-2 Vs. House No.1, Vavdi Road Morbi. Pan : Aiwpa 0121 A (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) : (""यथ"/Respondent) िनधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld.Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date Of Hearing : 05/06/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29/08/2025 Order Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini: The Captioned Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Pertaining To Assessment Year 2019-20 & The Cross Objection Filed By The Assessee, Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax

vii) Shri Arif Vs. ACIT, ITA No.976/Bang/2022 (ITAT-Bang) order dated 126.1.2023; viii) Manoj Aggarwal Vs. DCIT, (2008) 113 ITD 0377 (Del) 19. On the other hand, the ld.Counsel for the assessee submitted that the retired partners nowhere associated with the assessee-firm and since there was a ACIT Vs. Expert Particle Board and Others ITA No.139 /RJT/2021 and 142/RJT/2021

THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. SHRI BHAGVANJI PRABHUBHAI AMRUTIYA, MORBI

In the result, cross objection filed by the assessee, ( in CO No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं /.Ita No.139/Rjt/2021 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-2020 Asstt.Commissioner Of Income-Tax Expert Particle Board बनाम Cent.Cir.2, Rajkot. Survey No.111, 8-A National Vs. Highway B/H. Bharatinagar Iti, Ravapar Nadi Morbi 363 642. Pan : Aahfe 0299 G आयकर अपील सं /.Ita No.142/Rjt/2021 With Cross Objection No.05/Rjt/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-2020 Asstt.Commissioner Of Income-Tax Bhagvaji Prabhubhai बनाम Cent.Cir.2, Rajkot. Amrutiya, Meera Park-2 Vs. House No.1, Vavdi Road Morbi. Pan : Aiwpa 0121 A (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) : (""यथ"/Respondent) िनधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld.Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date Of Hearing : 05/06/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29/08/2025 Order Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini: The Captioned Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Pertaining To Assessment Year 2019-20 & The Cross Objection Filed By The Assessee, Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax

vii) Shri Arif Vs. ACIT, ITA No.976/Bang/2022 (ITAT-Bang) order dated 126.1.2023; viii) Manoj Aggarwal Vs. DCIT, (2008) 113 ITD 0377 (Del) 19. On the other hand, the ld.Counsel for the assessee submitted that the retired partners nowhere associated with the assessee-firm and since there was a ACIT Vs. Expert Particle Board and Others ITA No.139 /RJT/2021 and 142/RJT/2021

THE ITO WARD-1 (2) (1),, RAJKOT vs. SHRI KHRAJMAL LEKHRAJBHAI THAVRANI, RAJKOT

36,628/-\n51,69,18,800/-\nVI\nBharat I Bhatia\n2012-13\n177,72,01,183/-\n53,31,60,355/-\n124,40,40,828/-\nVII\nBharat I Bhatia\n2013-14\n58,46,25,710/-\n17,53,87,713\n40,92,37,997/-\nThe A.O. is directed to consider the income of the above-mentioned cases as determined above. Thus\nthe

SHRI BHARATKUMAR IASHWARBHAI BHATIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2),, RAJKOT

36,628/-\n51,69,18,800/-\nVI\nBharat I Bhatia\n2012-13\n177,72,01,183/-\n53,31,60,355/-\n124,40,40,828/-\nVII Bharat I Bhatia\n2013-14\n58,46,25,710/-\n17,53,87,713\n40,92,37,997/-\nThe A.O. is directed to consider the income of the above-mentioned cases as determined above. Thus\nthe

SHRI DAMJIBHAI LEKHRAJBHAI THAVRANI,,JUNAGADH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD 1(2)(4),, RAJKOT

36,628/-\n51,69,18,800/-\nVI\nBharat I Bhatia\n2012-13\n177,72,01,183/-\n53,31,60,355/-\n124,40,40,828/-\nVII Bharat I Bhatia\n2013-14\n58,46,25,710/-\n17,53,87,713\n40,92,37,997/-\nThe A.O. is directed to consider the income of the above-mentioned cases as determined above. Thus

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD-2,, JUNAGADH vs. SHRI DAMJIBHAI LEKHRAJBHAI THAVRANI,, JUNAGADH

36,628/- 51,69,18,800/-\nVI\nBharat I Bhatia\n2012-13\n177,72,01,183/- 53,31,60,355/- 124,40,40,828/-\nVII\nBharat I Bhatia\n2013-14\n58,46,25,710/- 17,53,87,713 40,92,37,997/-H\nThe A.O. is directed to consider the income of the above-mentioned cases as determined above. Thus

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD-2,, JUNAGADH vs. SHRI DAMJIBHAI LEKHRAJBHAI THAVRANI,, JUNAGADH

36,628/-\n51,69,18,800/-\nVI\nBharat I Bhatia\n2012-13\n177,72,01,183/-\n53,31,60,355/-\n124,40,40,828/-\nVII\nBharat I Bhatia\n2013-14\n58,46,25,710/-\n17,53,87,713\n40,92,37,997/-\nThe A.O. is directed to consider the income of the above-mentioned cases as determined above. Thus\nthe

SHRI BHARATKUMAR ISHWARBHAI BHATIYA,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

36,628/-\n51,69,18,800/-\nVI\nBharat I Bhatia\n2012-13\n177,72,01,183/-\n53,31,60,355/-\n124,40,40,828/-\nVII\nBharat I Bhatia\n2013-14\n58,46,25,710/-\n17,53,87,713\n40,92,37,997/-\nThe A.O. is directed to consider the income of the above-mentioned cases as determined above. Thus\nthe

THE ITO WARD-1 (2) (1),, RAJKOT vs. SHRI KHRAJMAL LEKHRAJBHAI THAVRANI, RAJKOT

36,628/-\n51,69,18,800/-\nVI\nBharat I Bhatia\n2012-13\n177,72,01,183/-\n53,31,60,355/-\n124,40,40,828/-\nVII\nBharat I Bhatia\n2013-14\n58,46,25,710/-\n17,53,87,713\n40,92,37,997/-\nThe A.O. is directed to consider the income of the above-mentioned cases as determined above. Thus\nthe

BHARATKUMAR ISHWARBHAI BHATIYA,,RAJKOT vs. ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CEN. CIR.-1,, RAJKOT

36,628/-\n51,69,18,800/-\nVI\nBharat I Bhatia\n2012-13\n177,72,01,183/-\n53,31,60,355/-\n124,40,40,828/-\nVII\nBharat I Bhatia\n2013-14\n58,46,25,710/-\n17,53,87,713\n40,92,37,997/-\nThe A.O. is directed to consider the income of the above-mentioned cases as determined above. Thus\nthe

SHRI BHARATKUMAR IASHWARBHAI BHATIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2),, RAJKOT

36,628/\n51,69,18,800/\nVI\nBharat I Bhatia\n2012-13\n177,72,01,183/\n53,31,60,355/\n124,40,40,828/\nVII Bharat I Bhatia\n2013-14\n58,46,25,710/\n17,53,87,713\n40,92,37,997/\nThe A.O. is directed to consider the income of the above-mentioned cases as determined above. Thus\nthe

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CEN. CIR.-1,, RAJKOT vs. BHARATKUMAR ISHWARBHAI BHATIYA,, RAJKOT

36,628/-\n51,69,18,800/-\nVI\nBharat I Bhatia\n2012-13\n177,72,01,183/-\n53,31,60,355/-\n124,40,40,828/-\nVII\nBharat I Bhatia\n2013-14\n58,46,25,710/-\n17,53,87,713\n40,92,37,997/-\nThe A.O. is directed to consider the income of the above-mentioned cases as determined above. Thus\nthe