SHRI RAJKOT VISHASHRIMALI JAIN SAMAJ ,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

delay in filing appeal has been condoned by CIT(Exemption), no question of invoking section 12A(b) arises. In the alternative, the counsel for the assessee submitted that the provisions of section 143(1

KRUPA VILAS GAU SEVA TRUST,KUTCH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 162/Rjt/2023 (Assessment Year: Na) (Hybrid Hearing)

12A and 80G of the Act, which were followed up by another set of applications filed directly with the DIT (Exemptions) on 21.12.2005; these applications were obviously delayed and the condonation application was filed on 14.03.2006 narrating the events that led to the delay. 19. In the above circumstances, it seems to us that the Tribunal has acted judicially, taking

SHRI SHARDAGRAM ALUMNI EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST,RAJKOT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes, in above terms

12A and 80G of the\nAct, which were followed up by another set of applications filed directly with the\nDIT (Exemptions) on 21.12.2005; these applications were obviously delayed and\nthe condonation application was filed on 14.03.2006 narrating the events that led\nto the delay.\n19. In the above circumstances, it seems to us that the Tribunal has acted\njudicially, taking

JAMNAGAR TAX CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATION,JAMNAGAR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), RAJKOT

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in\nabove terms

12A(1)(ac)(iii)", "Rule 17A(2)", "Section 5 of Limitation Act", "Section 12AA(1)(b)(i)", "Section 12AA(1)", "Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961" ], "issues": "Whether the delay in filing the appeal is condonable

ADHYAKSHYA LOK MELA AMLIKARAN SAMMITTEE,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2),, RAJKOT

Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for the statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy, आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 424 & 425/Rjt/2018 वष"/Asstt. Years: 2009-2010 & 2010-2011 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Adhyakshya Lok Mela Amlikaran Ito Sammittee Vs. Ward-1(2), A.D. Vyas & Co., Kotecha Nagar Rajkot Main Road, Opp. Kotecha Girls High School, Rajkot-360001 Pan: Aabaa0922F Assessee By : Shri D. M. Rindani, A.R Revenue By : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, D.R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24/04/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 17/05/2023 आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश Per Waseem Ahmed: The Captioned Appeals Have Been Filed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Common Orders Passed Under Section 263 Of The Act By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax Rajkot Dated 24/03/2014 Arising In The Matter Of Assessment Order Passed Under S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Here-In- After Referred To As "The Act") Relevant To The Assessment Years 2009-10 & 2010- 11. First, We Take Up Ita 424/Rjt/2018, An Appeal By The Assessee For The Ay 2009-10 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “Ground No 1 Order Of The Learned Cit 1 Rajkot Reopening The Assessment U/S 263 Is Totally Bad On Facts As Well On Law. Learned Cit Ought To Have Considered The Fact That The Assessee Is Already Assessed U/S 143(3) By Ito 1(2) Rajkot.

1 Rajkot has grievously erred in disallowing the expenses of Rs 155800/- without considering the proviso to section 12A(2)-(INSERTED BY THE FINANCE NO.2, 2014 W.e.f. 01/10/2014). Learned CIT(A) ought to have considered the fact that the at time of passing the order u/s 263 by learned CIT I, proviso to section 12A was not existed

ADHYAKSHYA LOK MELA AMLIKARAN SAMMITTEE,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2),, RAJKOT

Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for the statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy, आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 424 & 425/Rjt/2018 वष"/Asstt. Years: 2009-2010 & 2010-2011 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Adhyakshya Lok Mela Amlikaran Ito Sammittee Vs. Ward-1(2), A.D. Vyas & Co., Kotecha Nagar Rajkot Main Road, Opp. Kotecha Girls High School, Rajkot-360001 Pan: Aabaa0922F Assessee By : Shri D. M. Rindani, A.R Revenue By : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, D.R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24/04/2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 17/05/2023 आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश Per Waseem Ahmed: The Captioned Appeals Have Been Filed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Common Orders Passed Under Section 263 Of The Act By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax Rajkot Dated 24/03/2014 Arising In The Matter Of Assessment Order Passed Under S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Here-In- After Referred To As "The Act") Relevant To The Assessment Years 2009-10 & 2010- 11. First, We Take Up Ita 424/Rjt/2018, An Appeal By The Assessee For The Ay 2009-10 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “Ground No 1 Order Of The Learned Cit 1 Rajkot Reopening The Assessment U/S 263 Is Totally Bad On Facts As Well On Law. Learned Cit Ought To Have Considered The Fact That The Assessee Is Already Assessed U/S 143(3) By Ito 1(2) Rajkot.

1 Rajkot has grievously erred in disallowing the expenses of Rs 155800/- without considering the proviso to section 12A(2)-(INSERTED BY THE FINANCE NO.2, 2014 W.e.f. 01/10/2014). Learned CIT(A) ought to have considered the fact that the at time of passing the order u/s 263 by learned CIT I, proviso to section 12A was not existed

RAJKOT CITY CYBER SECURITY SOCIETY,RAJKOT vs. ITO WD 1(1)(1), RKT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini. & Shri Diesh Mohan Sinha

1) of Section 12A. Consequently, despite the issuance of notices, there was no intentional default or disregard for the directions of the Department, but rather an inadvertent delay due to lack of awareness and technical expertise. We humbly submit that the Trust now has ITA No. 265/RJT/2025 A. Y.2024-25 Rajkot City Cyber Security Society.. v. CIT(E) professional representation

VIKLANG VIKAS FOUNDATION,RASALIYA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 64/Rjt/2025 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (Na) (Hybrid Hearing) Viklang Vikas Foundation Vs. Cit(Exemption), Ramdev Nagar, Nr. Bus Station, Room No. 609, Floor – 6, Rasaliya, Nakhatrana Aayakar Bhavan (Vejalpur), Gujarat – 370670 Anandnagar, Prahladnagar Road, Gujarat – 380015 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatv8066F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri R. B. Shah, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing : 28/04/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 29/04/2025 आदेश / O R D E R

condonation of delay are reproduced as follows: “1. For the renewal of the trust petitioner had handed over this matter to their previous tax consultant Mr. Haresh Thakker who had filed form 10AB on dated 13.03.2023 and the same is rejected vide rejection order dated 18.09.2023 on account of non- submission of the requisite details, genuineness of activities

RANAVAV MADRESA CHARITY TALIMI TRUST,PORBANDAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER EXEMPTION WARD 2 , RAJKOT

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini. & Shri Diesh Mohan Sinha

condoned the delay in filing appeal by 225 days. 7. Brief facts of the case that the applicant has filed an application for registration under section 12A(1

SHREE SWAMINARAYAN MANDIR TRUST ,RAMPAR vs. THE ITO, EXEMPTION WARD - 1, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose, in above terms

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.340/Rjt/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2020-21)

condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. 8.3 In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, section 12A of the Income-tax Act has been amended to provide that in a case where a trust or institution has been granted registration under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, the benefit

G. C FOUNDATION,RAJKOT vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 266/Rjt/2025 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2023-24) G. C. Foundation Cit(Exemption) Vs. Survey No. 558/2558, P1 558 P2, B/H Income Tax Office, Vejalpur, Real Ceramics, Old Ghuntu Road, Rajkot-36001 Thorala, Rajkot - 363641 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaetg0610J (Appellant) (Respondent)

1. The Ld. CIT(E) erred in law by rejecting the application under section 80G(5)(iii) merely on the grounds of delay in filing of application for registration. 2. The Ld. CIT(E) erred in law by not condoning the delay in filing of application under section 80G(5)(iii) resulting in violation of principles of natural justice

SHRI SWAMI VIVEKANAND TRUST,ADIPUR vs. THE DCIT (CPC) , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 12A(1)(B) of the Act. The assesse was ensured to file the corrected Return, incorporating the details of such Audit, failing which the Return filed in ITR 7 will be treated as invalid. However the assessee has not responded to the above communication. Therefore the CPC vide its intimation u/s.143(1) dated 16-03-2016 denied the claim

VIRMANI FOUNDATION,RAJKOT vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, RAJKOT

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

condone the delay, which was on technical grounds. Learned Counsel also submitted that registration under section 12A had already been granted to the assessee and only application for approval under section 80(G) (5)(iii) of the Act was rejected, therefore the assessee prays the Bench that matter may be remitted back to the file of the Ld.CIT(E) with

JYOT FOUNDATION-RAJKOT,RAJKOT vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, RAJKOT

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

condone the delay, which was on technical grounds. Learned Counsel also submitted that registration under section 12A had already been granted to the assessee and only application for approval under section 80(G) (5)(iii) of the Act was rejected, therefore the assessee prays the Bench that matter may be remitted back to the file of the Ld.CIT(E) with

ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF INDUBHAI PAREKH SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE - RAJKOT,RAJKOT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 940/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (N.A.) (Hybrid Hearing) Alumni Associa"On Of Indubhai Parekh School Vs. The Cit(Exemp"On), Ahmedabad Of Architecture, Rajkot- 360005, Gujarat India "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aahta9691E (Appellant) (Respondent)

condone the delay in filling the present appeal. 4.1 The appellant Trust was constituted under the Deed of declaration of Trust dated 11/12/2019 with the charitable object of imparting education. Soon after formation of the trust, the appellant Trust was granted registration under section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 w.e.f 13/02/2020 by the Commissioner, which was before

LOTHADA-PIPLANA-PADAVALA INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION,RAJKOT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.239&240/Rjt/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2023-24) (Hybrid Hearing) Lothada-Piplana-Padavala Vs. The Commissioner Of Industrial Association, Shop No. Income Tax (Exemptions), 114, Silver Complex, Umiya Room No. 609, Floor-6, Industrial Area, Rajkot Kotda Aayakar Bhawan Sangani Road, Rajkot 360021 (Vejalpur), Nr: Sachin Tower, 100 Foot Road, Anandnagar-Prahladnagar Road, Ahmedabad "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaecl0666Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

condone the delay in filing of the present appeals and both the appeals are heard on merit. The brief facts of the case in that ITA no. 239/Rjt/2024 the application was filed electronically on 08/05/2023 in form no. 12AB within the meaning of section 12A(1

LOTHADA PIPLANA PADAVALA INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION,RAJKOT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.239&240/Rjt/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2023-24) (Hybrid Hearing) Lothada-Piplana-Padavala Vs. The Commissioner Of Industrial Association, Shop No. Income Tax (Exemptions), 114, Silver Complex, Umiya Room No. 609, Floor-6, Industrial Area, Rajkot Kotda Aayakar Bhawan Sangani Road, Rajkot 360021 (Vejalpur), Nr: Sachin Tower, 100 Foot Road, Anandnagar-Prahladnagar Road, Ahmedabad "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaecl0666Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

condone the delay in filing of the present appeals and both the appeals are heard on merit. The brief facts of the case in that ITA no. 239/Rjt/2024 the application was filed electronically on 08/05/2023 in form no. 12AB within the meaning of section 12A(1

SHRI SWAMI VIVEKANAND TRUST,ADIPUR vs. THE ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.902/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2015-16 Shri Swami Vivekanand Trust The Ito (Exemption) बनाम Plot No.1, Dc-2 Ward-1 Rambaug Road Rajkot. Vs. Ward-6A, Adipur. Pan : Aabts 1102 L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date Of Hearing : 28/01/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28/03/2025 Order Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay) 2015-16, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Chennai[In Short ‘Ld.Cit(A)/Nfac’], Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’), Dated 02.05.2024, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Intimation Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (Cpc) U/S 143(1) Of The Act, Dated 31.10.2015. Shri Swami Vivekanand Trust 2 2. Grievances Raised By The Assessee In This Appeal Are As Under:

Section 12A(1)(b) of the Act, therefore, ld.CIT(A) cannot condone the delay in submitting Form 10B because the CIT (Appeals