BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 250(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai351Delhi126Bangalore120Pune85Hyderabad68Kolkata68Jaipur65Chennai63Ahmedabad56Amritsar36Chandigarh27Nagpur18Visakhapatnam17Allahabad17Patna17Agra16Indore15Lucknow15Cochin15Rajkot15Surat13Raipur11Jodhpur9Cuttack7Jabalpur4Panaji4Guwahati4Ranchi3Dehradun2SC1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 12A31Section 1130Section 143(1)25Exemption14Section 11(3)12Section 1011Charitable Trust10Section 2509Section 11(2)8

SHRI SHAMJIBHAI HARJIBHAI TALAVIA CHARITABLE TRUST,RAJKOT vs. THE PR. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 73/RJT/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Dec 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Mrs. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal(Through Web-Based Video Conferencing Platform) िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 Shri Shamjibhai Harjibhai Talavia Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Charitable Trust, Income-Tax (Exemption), 50 Feet Road, 7-Parsana Society, Ahmedabad Rajkot-360002 Pan : Aacts 8845 F अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" "" "" यथ" "" "" यथ" यथ"/ (Respondent) यथ" Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ar Revenue By : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 04.09.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 04.12.2023 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश Per Annapurna Gupta: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Exemptions), Ahmedabad [Herein-After Referred To As “Cit(Exemptions)”] Dated 23.03.2021, In Exercise Of His Revisionary Powers Under Section 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”], For The Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds Challenging The Validity Of Revisionary Jurisdiction Exercised By The Ld. Cit (Exemptions) In The Present Case:- “1. The Grounds Of Appeal Mentioned Hereunder Are Without Prejudice To One Another. 2. The Order Passed By Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad [Hereinafter Referred As To The “Pr. Cit”] Is Bad & Illegal & Requires To Be Quashed.

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 11
Section 11(1)(a)7
Deduction7
Addition to Income5
Section 12A
Section 143(3)
Section 263

Section 10(23C)(vi) of the I.T. Act, any income received by any person on behalf of any university or other education institution existing solely for educational purposes and not for profit, other than those mentioned in sub-clause (iiiad) of sub-clause (iiiad) and which may be approved by the prescribed authority, shall not be included in total income

BOLBALA CHARITABLE TRUST,RAJKOT vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD., AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 249/RJT/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot08 Jul 2025

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 249&250/Rjt/2025 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (Na) (Hybrid Hearing) Bolbala Charitable Trust Vs. Cit(Exemption) Bolbala Sankul, 3, Milpara Main Room No. 609, Floor No. 6, Ayakar Road, Nr. Canal Road, Bhavan (Vejalpur), Prahalad Nagar, Rajkot - 360002 Road, Ahmedabad - 380015 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatb3989K (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing : 03/07/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 08/07/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

250 /Rjt/2025 Bolbala Charitable Trust or sub-clause (v) [or item (B) of sub-clause (vi)] of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A is governed by section 12AB(1)(b) of the act. Further, Rule 17A(1) of the Income Tax Rules prescribes the different forms to be filed for making application under various sub-clauses

BOLBALA CHARITABLE TRUST,RAJKOT vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 250/RJT/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot08 Jul 2025

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 249&250/Rjt/2025 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (Na) (Hybrid Hearing) Bolbala Charitable Trust Vs. Cit(Exemption) Bolbala Sankul, 3, Milpara Main Room No. 609, Floor No. 6, Ayakar Road, Nr. Canal Road, Bhavan (Vejalpur), Prahalad Nagar, Rajkot - 360002 Road, Ahmedabad - 380015 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatb3989K (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing : 03/07/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 08/07/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

250 /Rjt/2025 Bolbala Charitable Trust or sub-clause (v) [or item (B) of sub-clause (vi)] of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A is governed by section 12AB(1)(b) of the act. Further, Rule 17A(1) of the Income Tax Rules prescribes the different forms to be filed for making application under various sub-clauses

SHREE SWAMINARAYAN MANDIR TRUST ,RAMPAR vs. THE ITO, EXEMPTION WARD - 1, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose, in above terms

ITA 340/RJT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot06 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.340/Rjt/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2020-21)

For Appellant: Shri D. M. Rindani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr.DR
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 69A

charitable organizations. Due to absence of registration, tax liability is fastened even though they may otherwise be eligible for exemption and fulfil other substantive conditions. However, the power of condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. 8.3 In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, section 12A of the Income

SHRI RAJKOT VISHASHRIMALI JAIN SAMAJ ,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 256/RJT/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot13 Mar 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri G.R. Sanghavi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 139Section 143Section 143(1)Section 250Section 288

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. I.T.A No. 256/Rjt/2022 A.Y. 2020-21 Page No 2 Shri Rajkot Vishashrimali Jain Samaj vs. ITO 2. The assessee has taken the following grounds of appeal:- “1. That the Hon'ble CIT(A) NFAC Delhi has grievously erred in confirming the assessment of the returned income

ASHOK GONDHIA MEMORIAL TRUST,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO EXEMPTION, WARD -1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 112/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Apr 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri D. M. Rindani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 144Section 250

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (in short ‘Ld. CIT(A)’), dated 03.12.2025, which in turn arises out of an assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s. 144 r.w.s.263 of the Act on 30.03.2022. Ashok Gondhia Memorial Trust

VIDHYASAGAR CHARITABLE TRUST,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 77/RJT/2023[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot09 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri R. M. Manek, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 13(2)(c)Section 13(3)Section 147Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

250 of the Act from this office to present his contentions and any documents supporting them. In order to give proper opportunity to the appellant to present its case and to defend the grounds of appeal taken by the appellant, the case was posted for hearing on various dates, the details of which are as under: Date of Notice Date

SHRI PRABHAS PATAN JAIN SWETAMBERMURTI PUJAK SANGH,RAJKOT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2,, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for assessment year 2016-17

ITA 377/RJT/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot22 Feb 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri G.R. Sanghavi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(2)Section 11(3)Section 250

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. 2. Since common issues are involved in both the years under consideration, the same are being taken up together. We shall first discuss assessment year 2015-16 and our observations therein shall apply to assessment year 2016-17 as well. 3. The assessee has taken the following grounds

SHRI PRABHAS PATAN JAIN SWETAMBERMURTI PUJAK SANGH,RAJKOT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-2,, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for assessment year 2016-17

ITA 216/RJT/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot22 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri G.R. Sanghavi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(2)Section 11(3)Section 250

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. 2. Since common issues are involved in both the years under consideration, the same are being taken up together. We shall first discuss assessment year 2015-16 and our observations therein shall apply to assessment year 2016-17 as well. 3. The assessee has taken the following grounds

SHREE MANGROL VANIK DASHA SHRIMALI GNATI SHAPUR DARWAJA,MANGROAL-362225 vs. THE ITO (EXMPTION) WARD-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the order passed by Ld

ITA 56/RJT/2023[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot16 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri G.R. Sanghavi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri K.L. Solanki, Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. I.T.A No. 56/Rjt/2023 A.Y. 2011-12 Page No 2 Shree Mangrol Vanik Dasha Shrimali Gnati Shapur Darwaja vs. ITO (Exemption) 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- “1. That the learned A.O. has grievously erred in assessing the returned income

SHRI SWAMI VIVEKANAND TRUST,ADIPUR vs. THE ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 902/RJT/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.902/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2015-16 Shri Swami Vivekanand Trust The Ito (Exemption) बनाम Plot No.1, Dc-2 Ward-1 Rambaug Road Rajkot. Vs. Ward-6A, Adipur. Pan : Aabts 1102 L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date Of Hearing : 28/01/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28/03/2025 Order Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay) 2015-16, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Chennai[In Short ‘Ld.Cit(A)/Nfac’], Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’), Dated 02.05.2024, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Intimation Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (Cpc) U/S 143(1) Of The Act, Dated 31.10.2015. Shri Swami Vivekanand Trust 2 2. Grievances Raised By The Assessee In This Appeal Are As Under:

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250

250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), dated 02.05.2024, which in turn arises out of an intimation order passed by the Assessing Officer (CPC) u/s 143(1) of the Act, dated 31.10.2015. Shri Swami Vivekanand Trust 2 2. Grievances raised by the assessee in this appeal are as under: 1.The learned Commissioner (Appeals), National

SAURASHTRA RACHNATMAK SAMITI SEVA TRUST,RAJKOT, GUJARAT vs. ADIT, CPC, BENGALURU, JURISDICTION - RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 124/RJT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Mar 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.124/Rjt/2024 Assessment Year: (2019-20) (Hybrid Hearing) Saurashtra Rachnatmak Samiti Seva Vs. Adit, Trust. Cpc, Bengaluru. Rashtriya Shala Compound, Jurisdiction Rajkot. Rajkot- 360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaats9227M (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.R. Sanghvi, Ld. A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 143(1)

Section 143(1) of the Act. 5. That the assessee craves for leave to add, amend and or modify the grounds of appeal. 3. Succinctly, the factual panorama of the case is that assessee before us, is a public charitable trust and duly registered u/s 12AA of the Act and is regularly assessed to tax at Rajkot. The assessee

KAKADIYA PARIVARNA KULDEVI SHREE BRAHMANI KHODIYAR TRUST,AMRELI vs. THE ITO EXEMPTION, WARD(2), RAJKOT., RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 140/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Apr 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiassessment Year: (2021-2022) Kakadiya Parivarna Kuldevi Sghree The Ito Exemption Brahmani Khodiyar Trust Ward-2, Rajkot. Vs. Jaysukhbhai Laljibhai Kakadiya Jarkhida, Ta. Lathi, Amreli Pan : Aadtk 1328 E (Assessee) (Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld.Sr.Dr

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, ld.Sr.DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 24

250/- claimed by the assessee u/s 11(I)(d) of the Act, being voluntary contribution received as corpus. 3. The learned ADDL/JCIT (A)-l, Pune, erred in confirming the action of the CPC, Bangalore in not giving deduction of Rs.16,373/-, claimed by the assessee u/s 11(1)(a) of the Act. 4. The learned ADDL/JCIT (A)-l, Pune, erred

BALMUKUND CHARITABLE TRUST,MITHAPUR vs. CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTER INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, BENGALURU

In the result, assessee’s appeal is treated as dismissed

ITA 381/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot29 Aug 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 381/Rjt/2025 (Assessment Year: 2021-22) (Hybrid Hearing) Balmukund Charitable Trust, Vs. Centralized Processing Centre 322, A2, Type Mithapur, Income Tax Department Jamnagar-361345 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabtb2143E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sagar Shah, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. DR
Section 250

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’). 2. Before us, the learned Counsel, Shri Sagar Shah, on behalf of the assessee, during the course of hearing, submitted that assessee did not wish I.T.A Nos. 381/Rjt/2025 A.Y. 2021-22 2 Balmukund Charitable Trust to press this appeal, to which, the learned Departmental Representative did not raise

SHRI EKTA EDUCATION TRUST,KESHOD vs. THE ITO EXEMPTION, WARD (2), RAJKOT., RAJKOT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 177/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot29 Aug 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 177/Rjt/2025 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2022-23) Shri Ekta Education Trust बनाम Income Tax Officer (Exemption), Professional Academy Primary Ward-2, Rajkot, New Aayakar /Vs. School, Gokuldham Mangrole Road, Bhawan, Race Course Ring Keshod-362 220 Road, Rajkot-360 001 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aafts 1570 G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri D.M.Rindani, A.R. & Ms. Devina Patel, Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. D.R. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 13/08/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 29/08/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay) 2022-23, Is Directed Against The Order Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal)/Addl/Jcit(A)-1, (In Short “Ld.Cit(A)”, Dated 12.02.2025, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Centralized Processing Centre/Assessing Officer U/S 143(1) Of The Act. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Follows: “1. The Learned Addl/Jcit(A)-1, Visakhapatanam, Erred In Confirming The Action Of The Cpc, Bangalore By Failing To Appreciate That The Actin Of Cpc, Bangalore In Making Adjustments To The Returned Income Of The Appellant By Way Of Intimation U/S 143(1) Of The Act & In Denying The Benefit Of Sec.11 Of The Appellant Was Not A Case Of Permissible Prima Facie Adjustment.

For Appellant: Shri D.M.Rindani, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeal)/Addl/JCIT(A)-1, (in short “Ld.CIT(A)”, dated 12.02.2025, which in turn arises out of an order passed by the Centralized Processing Centre/Assessing Officer u/s 143(1) of the Act. 2. The grounds of appeal raised