ASHOK GONDHIA MEMORIAL TRUST,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO EXEMPTION, WARD -1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issue is squarely covered by its own previous decisions in favor of the assessee. The compensation received should be treated as income for charitable purposes and the benefit of Section 11 should be allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Ashok Gondhia Memorial Trust, received compensation of Rs. 2,30,00,004/- from Wockhardt Hospitals Ltd. The Assessing Officer treated this as business income and denied the benefit of Section 11 of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) upheld this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether compensation received from a hospital management agreement constitutes business income or income for charitable purposes, and if the benefit of Section 11 of the Act is admissible to the trust.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Addl. CIT v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association328 citing121 ITR 1 · 1980 · SC
- Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT323 citing101 ITR 234 · 1975 · SC · Read judgment
- Bihar Institute of Mining & Mine Surveying v. CIT57 citing201 ITR 939 · 1994 · HC
- Victoria Technical Institute v. ACIT13 citing188 ITR 57 · 1991 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha
Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM:
Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year 2015-16, is directed against the order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (in short ‘Ld. CIT(A)’), dated 03.12.2025, which in turn arises out of an assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s. 144 r.w.s.263 of t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026