BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “capital gains”+ Section 276clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi199Mumbai151Jaipur56Ahmedabad51Bangalore50Chennai42Kolkata23Rajkot12Nagpur11SC10Amritsar9Indore9Chandigarh8Hyderabad6Visakhapatnam5Guwahati5Pune4Surat4Lucknow2Cochin2Patna1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Dehradun1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 2638Section 244A3Addition to Income3Section 682Section 10(38)2Section 242Section 153A2Section 1322Long Term Capital Gains2

MISS PARI ANIL GANDHI, RAJKOT,RAJKOT vs. THE PR. CIT-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 51/RJT/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot17 Mar 2025AY 2015-16
Section 10(38)Section 24Section 244ASection 263Section 68

section (1), as if such house or houses had been\nlet out. However, the assessing officer has not gone into this aspect of the\nresidential units reported in the balance sheet of the assessee, which\nrendered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of\nrevenue.\n(4). Issue No.4, the ld PCIT noticed that the unsecured loans reported

LATE SMT. PRITI A. GANDHI L/R. SHRI ANILBHAI A. GANDHI, RAJKOT,RAJKOT vs. THE PR. CIT-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 57/RJT/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot17 Mar 2025AY 2015-16
House Property2
Penny Stock2
Deduction2
Section 10(38)Section 2Section 24Section 244ASection 263Section 68

section (1), as if such house or houses had been\nlet out. However, the assessing officer has not gone into this aspect of the\nresidential units reported in the balance sheet of the assessee, which\nrendered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of\nrevenue.\n(4). Issue No.4, the ld PCIT noticed that the unsecured loans reported

SHRI BHARATKUMAR IASHWARBHAI BHATIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRL-1,, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue, in ITA No

ITA 44/RJT/2023[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 134 & 135/Rjt/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2007-08 & 2008-09) Income Tax Officer, Ward- Shri Kherajmal Lekhrajbjai 5Th 1(2)(1), Aaykar Bhavan, Thavrani, 4- Parsana Nagar, Shri Vs. Floor, Room No. 517, Race Vaheguru Grupa, Near Refugee Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 Colony, Rajkot-360 001 001 "थायी लेखा सं./जी आइ आर सं./Pan/Gir No.: Adrpt 5807 E (Appellant) (Respondent)

276 ITR 38 (Allahbad)/[2006] 202 CTR 515 (Allahabad) wherein it has been held that for adjudicating upon plea of peak credit factual foundation has to be laid by assessee, who has to own all cash credit entries in books of accounts and only thereafter question of peak credit can be raised. Where amount of cash credits was standing

SHRI BHARATKUMAR IASHWARBHAI BHATIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2),, RAJKOT

ITA 46/RJT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

276 ITR 38 (Allahbad)/[2006] 202 CTR\n515 (Allahabad) wherein it has been held that for adjudicating upon plea of peak credit factual\nfoundation has to be laid by assessee, who has to own all cash credit entries in books of\naccounts and only thereafter question of peak credit can be raised. Where amount of cash\ncredits was standing

SHRI BHARATKUMAR ISHWARBHAI BHATIYA,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

ITA 171/RJT/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2006-07

276 ITR 38 (Allahbad)/[2006] 202 CTR\n515 (Allahabad) wherein it has been held that for adjudicating upon plea of peak credit factual\nfoundation has to be laid by assessee, who has to own all cash credit entries in books of\naccounts and only thereafter question of peak credit can be raised. Where amount of cash\ncredits was standing

SHRI BHARATKUMAR IASHWARBHAI BHATIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2),, RAJKOT

ITA 45/RJT/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2012-13
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

276 ITR 38 (Allahbad)/[2006] 202 CTR\n515 (Allahabad) wherein it has been held that for adjudicating upon plea of peak credit factual\nfoundation has to be laid by assessee, who has to own all cash credit entries in books of\naccounts and only thereafter question of peak credit can be raised. Where amount of cash\ncredits was standing

SHRI DAMJIBHAI LEKHRAJBHAI THAVRANI,,JUNAGADH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD 1(2)(4),, RAJKOT

ITA 16/RJT/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2010-11

276 ITR 38 (Allahbad)/[2006] 202 CTR 515 (Allahabad) wherein it has been held that for adjudicating upon plea of peak credit factual foundation has to be laid by assessee, who has to own all cash credit entries in books of accounts and only thereafter question of peak credit can be raised. Where amount of cash credits was standing

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CEN. CIR.-1,, RAJKOT vs. BHARATKUMAR ISHWARBHAI BHATIYA,, RAJKOT

ITA 49/RJT/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

276 ITR 38 (Allahbad)/[2006] 202 CTR\n515 (Allahabad) wherein it has been held that for adjudicating upon plea of peak credit factual\nfoundation has to be laid by assessee, who has to own all cash credit entries in books of\naccounts and only thereafter question of peak credit can be raised. Where amount of cash\ncredits was standing

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD-2,, JUNAGADH vs. SHRI DAMJIBHAI LEKHRAJBHAI THAVRANI,, JUNAGADH

ITA 33/RJT/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2011-12

276 ITR 38 (Allahbad)/[2006] 202 CTR\n515 (Allahabad) wherein it has been held that for adjudicating upon plea of peak credit factual\nfoundation has to be laid by assessee, who has to own all cash credit entries in books of\naccounts and only thereafter question of peak credit can be raised. Where amount of cash\ncredits was standing

THE ITO WARD-1 (2) (1),, RAJKOT vs. SHRI KHRAJMAL LEKHRAJBHAI THAVRANI, RAJKOT

ITA 135/RJT/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2008-09

276 ITR 38 (Allahbad)/[2006] 202 CTR\n515 (Allahabad) wherein it has been held that for adjudicating upon plea of peak credit factual\nfoundation has to be laid by assessee, who has to own all cash credit entries in books of\naccounts and only thereafter question of peak credit can be raised. Where amount of cash\ncredits was standing

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD-2,, JUNAGADH vs. SHRI DAMJIBHAI LEKHRAJBHAI THAVRANI,, JUNAGADH

ITA 31/RJT/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2009-10

276 ITR 38 (Allahbad)/[2006] 202 CTR\n515 (Allahabad) wherein it has been held that for adjudicating upon plea of peak credit factual\nfoundation has to be laid by assessee, who has to own all cash credit entries in books of\naccounts and only thereafter question of peak credit can be raised. Where amount of cash\ncredits was standing

BHARATKUMAR ISHWARBHAI BHATIYA,,RAJKOT vs. ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CEN. CIR.-1,, RAJKOT

ITA 4/RJT/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

276 ITR 38 (Allahbad)/[2006] 202 CTR\n515 (Allahabad) wherein it has been held that for adjudicating upon plea of peak credit factual\nfoundation has to be laid by assessee, who has to own all cash credit entries in books of\naccounts and only thereafter question of peak credit can be raised. Where amount of cash\ncredits was standing