PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED
ITA/153/2019HC Rajasthan08 Nov 2021
Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA
81.
6. Such application in which route is not
mentioned:-
Opposite Party No. 53.
In this way, only applications 16, 17, 18,
19 & 20 complies with all the conditions. “
The STAT, thereafter, observed that the Regional
Transport Authority had, in its meeting dated 27.12.2008,
ignored the provisions of Section 70, 71, 72 and Rule 68