BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,074Mumbai1,611Bangalore576Chennai553Jaipur427Kolkata383Ahmedabad294Hyderabad206Chandigarh138Pune110Rajkot98Amritsar97Indore81Nagpur73Raipur71Surat66Cochin65Patna61Guwahati54Agra48Cuttack38Lucknow38Jodhpur34Ranchi29Visakhapatnam16Allahabad12SC12Dehradun12Karnataka10Jabalpur8Calcutta4Telangana4Gauhati3Panaji3Rajasthan3Orissa3Varanasi2Kerala2Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 2603Section 153A2Section 143(2)2Addition to Income2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - I vs. SHRI ARVIND GOTEWAL S/O SHREERAM GOTEWAL

The appeals are allowed

ITA/359/2018HC Rajasthan26 Sept 2024

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 260

undisclosed income being unearthed during such search.” 6. Therefore, the position of law is quite clear. The Tribunal was of the view that the latest judgment in the case of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V/S. LANCY CONSTRUCTIONS reported in (2016) 66 9 taxmann.com 264 (KARNATAKA) was valid since it is the latest judgment. We have considered the said judgment. Therein

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ANKIT CHIRAG DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

The appeal is allowed to the extent indicated herein-above, leaving

ITA/8/2024HC Rajasthan13 Aug 2024

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,MADAN GOPAL VYAS

For Appellant: Mr. S. Rajeswara Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amit
Section 115Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 69Section 69A

undisclosed, of relevant financial year alone can be assessed to tax in the same assessment year and not of the preceding assessment year and as such, Section 69A of the IT Act is not attracted. He would rely upon the decision of the M.P. High Court in the matter of Harlal Mannulal v. Commissioner of Income

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

Income Tax Officer, Salary Circle[39]) and not prior thereto.Any expenditure which the Government incurs, in implementing its policies, should be authorized by the Appropriation Act which is a law as contemplated by Article 282 (Bhim Singh[31]; S. Subramaniam Balaji[36] and Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur[38]) which stipulates that the Union or the States may make