BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 66(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,292Mumbai873Chennai376Bangalore366Ahmedabad220Jaipur208Kolkata162Hyderabad162Chandigarh116Raipur84Pune78Rajkot55Surat41Patna40Indore40Guwahati39Lucknow33Amritsar31Ranchi27Cochin22Nagpur20Allahabad17Visakhapatnam16Cuttack14Jodhpur12Telangana11SC11Dehradun9Karnataka7Agra7Orissa7Calcutta4Rajasthan4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Kerala3Himachal Pradesh2Varanasi2Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 66(1)4Section 2603Section 153A2Addition to Income2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENRAL vs. SHRI NIRMAL KUMAR KEDIA

In the result, the impugned orders of the

ITA/4/2020HC Rajasthan30 Sept 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Section 39(1)Section 66(1)

SECTION 66(1) OF THE KVAT ACT, 2003 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22.01.2020 PASSED IN NO.ADCOM/ZONE-II/APP-1/SMR/CR-03/2019-20 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES ZONE-II, GANDHINAGAR BANGALORE SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 06.05.2016 PASSED IN VAT AP NO.59/15-16 BY THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (APPEALS) 1 BANGALORE PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE REASSESSMENT

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

reassessment of such property taxes was made, and the amount of tax to be levied and collected was determined under sub-section (1). The proviso thereto required the Corporation to pay simple interest, at the rate of six percent per annum, on the amount of excess liable to be refunded under Sub-section (2), from the date of the decree

MAMTA GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/130/2019HC Rajasthan28 Jul 2022

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - I vs. SHRI ARVIND GOTEWAL S/O SHREERAM GOTEWAL

The appeals are allowed

ITA/359/2018HC Rajasthan26 Sept 2024

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 260

1. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRLCE, C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU–560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU–560 001. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) 4 AND: M/S. GMR ENERGY LIMITED, 25/1, SKIP HOUSE, MUSEUM ROAD, BENGALURU–560 025. PAN:AAACT8420A. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. BALARAM