Search: house property

10 results for “house property”+ Section 92clear

Sorted by relevance

M/S SARAF SEASONING UDYOG vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR

ITA/322/2017HC Rajasthan09 Jul 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Section 92 of the Evidence Act, 1872 that once there is an agreement in writing between the parties, then the parties cannot plead an oral agreement to show that the agreement was not the agreement as was entered into between the parties but there was some other agreement. The trial court, accordingly, by reference to the terms of the Agreement

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

92. (2014) 8 SCC 682 93. (1992) 2 SCC 643 94. (1992) 1 SCC 558 95. (1974) 4 SCC 3 96. (1979) 3 SCC 489 97. (2002) 2 SCC 188 98. (2016) 6 SCC 1 99. AIR 1951 SC 318 100. (1981)1 SCC 246 101. (1955) 1 SCR 1045 3 102. (1964) 6 SCR 903 103. 1952 CriLJ

M/S SARAF SEASONING UDYOG vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

M/S SARAF SEASONING UDYOG vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, vs. MS. HARSHITA MAHESHWARI,

M/S FINGROWTH COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SILVER AND ARTS PALACE

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S HADOTI PUNJ VIKAS LTD.

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S EDILA BUSINESS WORLD PVT. LTD.

SMT. BADAMI DEVI KUMAWAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

MAMTA GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SKYWAYS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE COMPANY (P) LTD.