Search: disallowance

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 22clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

C.I.T. II JODHPUR vs. M/S JEEWAN RAM CHOUDHARY

ITA/185/2013HC Rajasthan17 Sept 2019

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

For Appellant: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.PTL ENTERPRISES LTD

section 45A, we are of the view that the disallowance of the amount of Rs.52 lakhs cannot be termed as an expenditure for the year 2004-05. The second question is answered in favour of the revenue. 22

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S HARI NARAIN PARWAL

ITA/90/2020HC Rajasthan21 Feb 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 271

C.I.T. II JODHPUR vs. M/S JEEWAN RAM CHOUDHARY

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S HARI NARAIN PARWAL

C.I.T. II JODHPUR vs. M/S JEEWAN RAM CHOUDHARY

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S HARI NARAIN PARWAL

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT LTD

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SKYWAYS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE COMPANY (P) LTD.