BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 3(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai2,425Mumbai2,067Delhi1,670Kolkata1,311Pune1,187Bangalore1,168Hyderabad783Ahmedabad704Jaipur637Chandigarh411Surat296Lucknow278Karnataka267Raipur233Indore224Nagpur209Amritsar154Rajkot143Cochin139Cuttack131Visakhapatnam122Panaji108Calcutta98Patna81SC52Jabalpur46Guwahati46Jodhpur44Dehradun42Telangana33Varanasi31Allahabad30Agra26Ranchi11Orissa7Kerala7Rajasthan6Andhra Pradesh5Punjab & Haryana3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Himachal Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 52

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

ITA/153/2019HC Rajasthan08 Nov 2021

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA

delay is, therefore, condoned. Since the appellants are either persons in whose favor permits were granted by the Regional Transport Authority, or in whose favor the permits were transferred later, they are undoubtedly aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge. We see no reason, therefore, to deny them leave to prefer an appeal against the order passed

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S SHRI RAMDOOT PRASAD SEWA SAMITI

ITA/62/2020HC Rajasthan08 Feb 2022

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,SUDESH BANSAL

For Respondent: Mr. Atarup Banerjee
Section 5

1 of 2023 is disposed of. 4. Now this Court shall take into consideration the action that set in motion the instant dispute arose in the year 1995 with the institution of a suit being Title Suit No. 301431 of 1995 instituted before the Ld. Civil Judge Junior Division at Alipore Dist. 24-Parganas, South. 5. Background facts: Proceeding before

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

ITA/157/2019HC Rajasthan08 Nov 2021

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA

b) deposit any amount to the credit of any Account or Fund constituted by or in pursuance of any order made under that section, Digitally Signed By:HARVINDER KAUR BHATIA Signing Date:20.12.2025 17:13:57 Signature Not Verified LPA 891/2011 & connected matters Page 7 of 27 makes any default in paying or depositing the whole or any part

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

ITA/151/2019HC Rajasthan08 Nov 2021

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA

b) deposit any amount to the credit of any Account or Fund constituted by or in pursuance of any order made under that section, Digitally Signed By:HARVINDER KAUR BHATIA Signing Date:20.12.2025 17:13:57 Signature Not Verified LPA 891/2011 & connected matters Page 7 of 27 makes any default in paying or depositing the whole or any part

M/S UDASEE STAMPING PVT. LTD. vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, JAIPUR

ITA/132/2019HC Rajasthan16 Jul 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

b) deposit any amount to the credit of any Account or Fund constituted by or in pursuance of any order made under that section, Digitally Signed By:HARVINDER KAUR BHATIA Signing Date:20.12.2025 17:13:57 Signature Not Verified LPA 891/2011 & connected matters Page 7 of 27 makes any default in paying or depositing the whole or any part

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SKYWAYS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE COMPANY (P) LTD.

ITA/82/2020HC Rajasthan14 Feb 2022

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,SUDESH BANSAL

1, Article 4(5) and Article 25 of the GDPR and the same are extracted hereunder: “Article 1: Subject-matter and objectives: 1. This Regulation lays down rules relating to the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and rules relating to the free movement of personal data. 2. This Regulation protects fundamental rights