PR. COMMISSIOENR OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI MANOJ RATHI

Accordingly, the appeal (ITAT/48/2021) stands dismissed

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

condonation of delay, we exercise discretion and condone the delay in filing the appeal. For such reason alone, the application

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (CENTRAL) vs. SHRI VIJAY KUMAR SAINI

The Appeal is allowed to the extent indicated herein above

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur Bench, Raipur (For Short The "Itat") In The Online Portal Via E-Filing Mode, Against The Order Dated 27.7.2023 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income- Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi {For Short The "Cit (Appeals)"}. However, Thereafter, He Was Not

condonation of delay, by recording a finding which is perverse to the record?” 2. The appellant/assessee has preferred an appeal

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA

Delay Condonation Application No. 2607 of 2019 Application For Leave to Appeal No. 2606 of 2019 Sandeep Kumar .....Appellant Vs. State

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, JAIPUR vs. M/S ANKIT CHIRAG DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

Bench: AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

delay) This is an application filed by the applicant / appellant seeking condonation of 10 days delay in filing the appeal

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. AMAN EXPORTS INTERNATIONAL

The appeal is disposed of

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,ASHUTOSH KUMAR

condone the delay of 191 days in filing the present appeal. l Counsel for the Appellant : Ms. K. Mamata Choudary

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA

condoning the delay, it would be treated as an affront to the order of the Supreme Court. But this is not the case

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA

condoning the delay, it would be treated as an affront to the order of the Supreme Court. But this is not the case

M/S UDASEE STAMPING PVT. LTD. vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, JAIPUR

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

condoning the delay, it would be treated as an affront to the order of the Supreme Court. But this is not the case

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SKYWAYS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE COMPANY (P) LTD.

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,SUDESH BANSAL

delays the Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:08.01.2026 18:27:10 Signature Not Verified CS (COMM) 82/2020 Page 88 of 241 obtaining of information considerably. In contrast, domestic intermediaries provide better assistance however, foreign intermediaries having server in foreign countries tend to deny information arbitrarily. 143. One of the biggest road blocks in safeguarding the money in cases