BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 17(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai803Delhi779Karnataka539Chennai428Bangalore423Ahmedabad292Jaipur225Pune203Kolkata160Hyderabad157Chandigarh133Lucknow79Cochin75Indore67Amritsar64Rajkot61Cuttack59Visakhapatnam48Surat41Nagpur34Allahabad34Raipur33Telangana30Agra25Calcutta19SC16Jodhpur16Patna11Kerala10Ranchi10Guwahati9Varanasi9Rajasthan8Dehradun7Panaji5Punjab & Haryana5Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2Jabalpur2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 12A10Section 2637Section 80G4Section 2(15)3Section 260A2Section 122Exemption2

SHRI VIJAY MAKHIJA S/O SHRI GOVIND RAM MAKHIJA vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF TAX-I

ITA/81/2019HC Rajasthan29 Jul 2020

Bench: SABINA,PRAKASH GUPTA

For Appellant: Mr. Amit Chaudhary and Mr. Vijay ChawlaFor Respondent: Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Senior Advocate with Mr
Section 2(15)Section 260ASection 3Section 38Section 38(1)Section 72

trust or commission (by whatever name called) will require similar consideration — i.e. whether it is at cost with a nominal markup or significantly higher, to determine if it falls within the mischief of “commercial activity”. However, in the case of such notified bodies, there is no quantified limit in Section 10(46). Therefore, the Central Government would have to decide

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT LTD

ITA/6/2021HC Rajasthan01 Nov 2022

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,KULDEEP MATHUR

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

17) It is true that S. 1 of the Indian Trusts Act makes provisions of the Act inapplicable to public or private religious or charitable endowments; and so, these sections may not in terms apply to the trust now in question. These sections however embody nothing more or less than the principles which have been applied to all trusts

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SMT. PALLAVI MISHRA,

ITA/10/2022HC Rajasthan14 Nov 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,UMA SHANKER VYAS

Section 12Section 12ASection 260A

17 SCC 254 held that newly registered trust on basis of its objects, without any activity having been undertaken, is entitled for registration under Section 12AA of the Act, and observed as under: - “9. Section 12-AA undoubtedly requires the Commissioner to satisfy himself about the objects of the trust or institution and genuineness of its activities and grant

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, vs. MS. HARSHITA MAHESHWARI,

ITA/94/2020HC Rajasthan21 Feb 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

2 companies and certain other individuals as Directors of 4 listed companies, 3 subsidiaries of one listed company and an unlisted company is bad in law since the Joint APLs merely represents the estate of PDB and thus, had no rights to seek appointment of Directors in companies in which PDB was not a "Member". Further, without prejudice

M/S FINGROWTH COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/9/2020HC Rajasthan24 Aug 2023

Bench: AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,SAMEER JAIN

2 companies and certain other individuals as Directors of 4 listed companies, 3 subsidiaries of one listed company and an unlisted company is bad in law since the Joint APLs merely represents the estate of PDB and thus, had no rights to seek appointment of Directors in companies in which PDB was not a "Member". Further, without prejudice

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AJMER vs. M/S NITIN SPINNERS LTD.

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA/30/2019HC Rajasthan23 May 2022

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

For Appellant: Mr. Ajay Kumrani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Sumesh Bajaj alongwith Mr. Rishabh
Section 12Section 2(15)Section 80Section 80G

2 has erred in denying the benefits under the Act. So far as the penalty proceedings are concerned, as a necessary corollary, the same must be quashed and set aside.” 11. In Sant Girdhar Anand Parmhans Sant Ashram (supra), the Punjab and Haryana High Court has held as under:- “6…...Accordingly, it was recorded by the Tribunal that since

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI BABA MOHAN RAM KALI KHOLI WALE

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/13/2025HC Rajasthan28 Mar 2026

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 12ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 263

2 of 3) [ITA-13/2025] of TDS under the provisions of the Act which allow certain exemptions to charitable trusts under Section 12A. The CIT (TDS), by order dated 22.03.2024, reached to the conclusion that the AO had not properly conducted the inquiry and remanded the matter to the AO for conducting proper inquiry into all the aspects, which

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - III vs. LALIT KUMAR BIYANI

ITA/54/2020HC Rajasthan10 May 2023

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

Section 12ASection 51

charitable ssee also did not proffer activity carried on other ption the activity of the r. However this activity f the State Governments, bursed by the State y in implementation of nt, with the funds of the MOHIT GOYAL 2024.09.19 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document