PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AJMER vs. M/S NITIN SPINNERS LTD.
The appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA/30/2019HC Rajasthan23 May 2022
Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
For Appellant: Mr. Ajay Kumrani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Sumesh Bajaj alongwith Mr. Rishabh
Section 12Section 2(15)Section 80Section 80G
2
has erred in denying the benefits under the Act. So
far as the penalty proceedings are concerned, as a
necessary corollary, the same must be quashed and
set aside.”
11.
In Sant Girdhar Anand Parmhans Sant Ashram (supra), the
Punjab and Haryana High Court has held as under:-
“6…...Accordingly, it was recorded by the Tribunal
that since