BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 13(2)(h)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka470Mumbai392Delhi359Jaipur194Chennai193Bangalore176Chandigarh74Hyderabad74Ahmedabad68Pune62Kolkata57Cochin48Lucknow41Amritsar38Cuttack29Indore28Visakhapatnam19Allahabad19Telangana19Nagpur17Calcutta16Agra15Kerala10Raipur9SC8Jodhpur6Rajkot5Rajasthan5Surat5Varanasi4Punjab & Haryana3Andhra Pradesh2Jabalpur2Patna2Panaji2Ranchi1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 80G4Section 12A2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT LTD

ITA/6/2021HC Rajasthan01 Nov 2022

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,KULDEEP MATHUR

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

charitable trust. This Trust was taken over by Believers Church, Thiruvalla vide agreement dated 23/02/2009 and by that agreement all the assets and liabilities of Carmel Educational Trust were transferred to Believers Church and the assesses ceased to be the trustees of Carmel Educational Trust. According to the CIT(A), the right of trusteeship is not legally enforceable right

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, vs. MS. HARSHITA MAHESHWARI,

ITA/94/2020HC Rajasthan21 Feb 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

2 companies and certain other individuals as Directors of 4 listed companies, 3 subsidiaries of one listed company and an unlisted company is bad in law since the Joint APLs merely represents the estate of PDB and thus, had no rights to seek appointment of Directors in companies in which PDB was not a "Member". Further, without prejudice

M/S FINGROWTH COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/9/2020HC Rajasthan24 Aug 2023

Bench: AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,SAMEER JAIN

2 companies and certain other individuals as Directors of 4 listed companies, 3 subsidiaries of one listed company and an unlisted company is bad in law since the Joint APLs merely represents the estate of PDB and thus, had no rights to seek appointment of Directors in companies in which PDB was not a "Member". Further, without prejudice

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AJMER vs. M/S NITIN SPINNERS LTD.

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA/30/2019HC Rajasthan23 May 2022

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

For Appellant: Mr. Ajay Kumrani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Sumesh Bajaj alongwith Mr. Rishabh
Section 12Section 2(15)Section 80Section 80G

trust has several objects, some of which are charitable and others are non-charitable and the trustees have unfettered discretion to apply the income to any of the objects, the whole claim for exemption would fail and no part of the income would be exempted from tax. The respondent Society is engaged in commercial activities and cannot be considered

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - III vs. LALIT KUMAR BIYANI

ITA/54/2020HC Rajasthan10 May 2023

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

Section 12ASection 51

h w th r c s o th o c m c is th th to w r a fr r th c c a 12. The K (supra) O&M) Page 5 of 8 n our view, duly fall within the pu erm 'Education' as used in section 5. So far as the observation ncome of the assessee