BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 13(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,084Delhi836Chennai602Karnataka505Bangalore493Ahmedabad323Jaipur257Pune159Kolkata158Hyderabad155Cochin99Chandigarh94Indore86Surat84Lucknow69Rajkot51Cuttack50Visakhapatnam45Allahabad37Raipur32Amritsar29Nagpur29Agra25Jodhpur24Calcutta23Telangana22SC17Patna12Kerala10Varanasi8Guwahati6Jabalpur5Dehradun5Panaji5Rajasthan4Punjab & Haryana4Ranchi4Orissa3Himachal Pradesh2Andhra Pradesh2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 12A2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT LTD

ITA/6/2021HC Rajasthan01 Nov 2022

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,KULDEEP MATHUR

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

d) the beneficiary, being competent to contract, consents to the delegation." (17) It is true that S. 1 of the Indian Trusts Act makes provisions of the Act inapplicable to public or private religious or charitable endowments; and so, these sections may not in terms apply to the trust now in question. These sections however embody nothing more or less

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - III vs. LALIT KUMAR BIYANI

ITA/54/2020HC Rajasthan10 May 2023

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

Section 12ASection 51

charitable ssee also did not proffer activity carried on other ption the activity of the r. However this activity f the State Governments, bursed by the State y in implementation of nt, with the funds of the MOHIT GOYAL 2024.09.19 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ITA-54-2020 (O S d

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, vs. MS. HARSHITA MAHESHWARI,

ITA/94/2020HC Rajasthan21 Feb 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

1 and 2 companies and certain other individuals as Directors of 4 listed companies, 3 subsidiaries of one listed company and an unlisted company is bad in law since the Joint APLs merely represents the estate of PDB and thus, had no rights to seek appointment of Directors in companies in which PDB was not a "Member". Further, without prejudice

M/S FINGROWTH COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/9/2020HC Rajasthan24 Aug 2023

Bench: AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,SAMEER JAIN

1 and 2 companies and certain other individuals as Directors of 4 listed companies, 3 subsidiaries of one listed company and an unlisted company is bad in law since the Joint APLs merely represents the estate of PDB and thus, had no rights to seek appointment of Directors in companies in which PDB was not a "Member". Further, without prejudice