BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “charitable trust”+ Exemptionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,803Delhi1,549Chennai1,054Ahmedabad862Bangalore820Pune776Karnataka587Kolkata503Jaipur462Hyderabad274Surat238Cochin212Chandigarh199Amritsar169Indore156Lucknow150Cuttack149Rajkot144Visakhapatnam130Nagpur113Agra60Raipur58Jodhpur56Patna43Calcutta42Telangana33Ranchi31Dehradun30Allahabad27Panaji25Jabalpur22SC22Varanasi20Guwahati19Kerala13Punjab & Haryana10Rajasthan9Orissa5Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2J&K1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 12A16Section 2637Section 80G6Exemption4Section 133A3Section 2(15)3Charitable Trust3Section 1312Section 260A2Section 12

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SMT. PALLAVI MISHRA,

ITA/10/2022HC Rajasthan14 Nov 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,UMA SHANKER VYAS

Section 12Section 12ASection 260A

Exemption)/competent authority to grant registration under Section 12AA of the Act. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the ITAT was absolutely unjustified in granting the registration in favour of the assessee holding that the object and purpose of the assessee Trust are both charitable

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIKANER vs. M/S BOMBAY BUILDER

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/32/2019HC Rajasthan16 Nov 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

2
Survey u/s 133A2
Section 11
Section 12A
Section 131
Section 133A
Section 139(1)
Section 245C
Section 80G

EXEMPTION) KOLKATA VS M/S GOBIND RAM GOEL CHARITABLE TRUST BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT LTD

ITA/6/2021HC Rajasthan01 Nov 2022

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,KULDEEP MATHUR

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

charitable trust. This Trust was taken over by Believers Church, Thiruvalla vide agreement dated 23/02/2009 and by that agreement all the assets and liabilities of Carmel Educational Trust were transferred to Believers Church and the assesses ceased to be the trustees of Carmel Educational Trust. According to the CIT(A), the right of trusteeship is not legally enforceable right

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI SANDEEP CHHABRA

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/13/2021HC Rajasthan06 May 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Section 12ASection 133A

EXEMPTION), KOLKATA VS GOVINDRAM GOEL CHARITABLE TRUST BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI BABA MOHAN RAM KALI KHOLI WALE

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/13/2025HC Rajasthan28 Mar 2026

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 12ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 263

Trust Act, 1959 and therefore could not claim any exemption from the deduction [2026:RJ-JP:13090-DB] (2 of 3) [ITA-13/2025] of TDS under the provisions of the Act which allow certain exemptions to charitable

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AJMER vs. M/S NITIN SPINNERS LTD.

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA/30/2019HC Rajasthan23 May 2022

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

For Appellant: Mr. Ajay Kumrani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Sumesh Bajaj alongwith Mr. Rishabh
Section 12Section 2(15)Section 80Section 80G

trust has several objects, some of which are charitable and others are non-charitable and the trustees have unfettered discretion to apply the income to any of the objects, the whole claim for exemption

SHRI VIJAY MAKHIJA S/O SHRI GOVIND RAM MAKHIJA vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF TAX-I

ITA/81/2019HC Rajasthan29 Jul 2020

Bench: SABINA,PRAKASH GUPTA

For Appellant: Mr. Amit Chaudhary and Mr. Vijay ChawlaFor Respondent: Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Senior Advocate with Mr
Section 2(15)Section 260ASection 3Section 38Section 38(1)Section 72

Exemptions) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority1 to buttress his submission and would also submit that the substantial questions of law be answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee and the appeal be allowed. 9. Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent herein/assessee Raipur Development Authority, would submit that the two authorities – CIT (Appeals

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, vs. MS. HARSHITA MAHESHWARI,

ITA/94/2020HC Rajasthan21 Feb 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

Charitable societies and trusts are not part of the estate of the testatrix which are managed by the respective managing committees and trustees of the societies or trusts. The companies are separate legal entities controlled by their Board of Directors and the affairs of the estate of the testatrix do not include the right to control the affairs

M/S FINGROWTH COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/9/2020HC Rajasthan24 Aug 2023

Bench: AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,SAMEER JAIN

Charitable societies and trusts are not part of the estate of the testatrix which are managed by the respective managing committees and trustees of the societies or trusts. The companies are separate legal entities controlled by their Board of Directors and the affairs of the estate of the testatrix do not include the right to control the affairs