BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “capital gains”+ Short Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,828Delhi3,270Chennai1,309Bangalore1,241Kolkata1,089Ahmedabad773Jaipur584Hyderabad435Pune407Surat219Chandigarh191Raipur180Indore173Nagpur137Visakhapatnam114Rajkot109Cochin91Lucknow73SC63Agra52Karnataka51Panaji50Dehradun46Calcutta42Amritsar34Guwahati31Cuttack30Ranchi30Patna23Jabalpur22Kerala19Jodhpur17Punjab & Haryana8Allahabad7Rajasthan6Telangana6Varanasi5Orissa3Andhra Pradesh2MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Himachal Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)4Section 2742Addition to Income2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT LTD

ITA/6/2021HC Rajasthan01 Nov 2022

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,KULDEEP MATHUR

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

capital gains cannot be assessed. A perusal of the trust deed in the instant cases I.T.A.Noa.48, 46, 47, 49, 51, 54, 55, 56 & 68/20 & 6/21 :: 24 :: does not indicate that any power was conferred on the trustees to relinquish their position as trustees en banc. Rather, as noticed by the Supreme Court in Sheikh Abdul Kayum

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S HARI NARAIN PARWAL

ITA/90/2020HC Rajasthan21 Feb 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 271
Section 271(1)
Section 271(1)(c)
Section 274

short term capital gain Rs. 97,02,942/- and long term capital loss Rs. 350,31,73,044/- was claimed

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 vs. M/S ROYAL JEWELLERS

ITA/81/2024HC Rajasthan15 Oct 2024

Bench: PANKAJ BHANDARI,PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Section 10

capital loss o short term cap to the fall of v aside the orde 5. T vide its order that the incom was accessib profession’. T therefore, rem 6. T ‘income from actual transfe notional loss allowed to be 7. T dated 19.02.2 was taken up 2 (O&M) m M/s Adinath Syndicate. Th 85/- was claimed

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

capital valueand, as the tax had already been imposed, levied and collected on that basis, had made the imposition, levy, collection and recovery of the tax valid, notwithstanding the declaration by the Court that, as “rate”, the levy was incompetent; the legislature had equated the tax collected to a “rate”, giving a new meaning to the expression “rate”; while

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, vs. MS. HARSHITA MAHESHWARI,

ITA/94/2020HC Rajasthan21 Feb 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

terms of Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the Chairman of the company, HVL cannot arrogate unto himself the power to cause such appointment when such power ultimately rests with the Board of Directors. The observation of the two Joint APLs that the evident performance of BCrL, the flagship company of MP Birla Group is deteriorating ever since

M/S FINGROWTH COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/9/2020HC Rajasthan24 Aug 2023

Bench: AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,SAMEER JAIN

terms of Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the Chairman of the company, HVL cannot arrogate unto himself the power to cause such appointment when such power ultimately rests with the Board of Directors. The observation of the two Joint APLs that the evident performance of BCrL, the flagship company of MP Birla Group is deteriorating ever since