Search: capital gains | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Exemptionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,998 Delhi2,723 Chennai1,388 Bangalore1,253 Kolkata1,053 Ahmedabad636 Jaipur389 Pune338 Hyderabad318 Indore224 Chandigarh210 Raipur139 Cochin136 Lucknow113 Surat107 Nagpur84 Rajkot76 Visakhapatnam61 Calcutta60 SC56 Amritsar50 Patna46 Cuttack38 Guwahati34 Karnataka34 Agra25 Jodhpur24 Ranchi23 Dehradun19 Kerala12 Jabalpur11 Telangana10 Rajasthan7 Allahabad7 Varanasi6 Panaji6 Orissa4 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2 Gauhati2 Punjab & Haryana2 Andhra Pradesh2 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1 K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1 Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)4 Section 143(3)2 Section 2742 Capital Gains2 Exemption2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT LTD

ITA/6/2021HC Rajasthan01 Nov 2022

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,KULDEEP MATHUR

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

exempted from capital gains by the statute could be taxed as a casual or non-recurring receipt under section 10(3) read

C I TEXEMPTIONS JAIPUR vs. J D A JAIPUR

ITA/113/2016HC Rajasthan02 Aug 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,ASHUTOSH KUMAR

For Appellant: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: SHRI.JOHN POOMKUDY

Section 143(3)Section 2(13)

exemption from capital gains alleging it to be sale of agricultural land. The AO found that the properties were acquired

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 vs. M/S ROYAL JEWELLERS

ITA/81/2024HC Rajasthan15 Oct 2024

Bench: PANKAJ BHANDARI,PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

exemption un ort ‘the Act, 1961’) of an amoun NJAB AND HARYANA ARH ITA-81-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.07.2024 …Appellant . (Now known as Adishwar …Respondent NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA NJAY VASHISTH g Counsel for the appellant. ) dated 12.10.2023, passed by the llowing the appeal filed by the there was no actual loss on and the Tribunal has erred

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S HARI NARAIN PARWAL

ITA/90/2020HC Rajasthan21 Feb 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

gain Rs. 97,02,942/- and long term capital loss Rs. 350,31,73,044/- was claimed as exempt. 7. During

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI SANJAY CHHABRA

ITA/31/2021HC Rajasthan06 May 2022

Bench: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

exempted from specific performance. 43. Likewise, in Satya Narain Garg v. DCM Ltd. 24 and in GE Capital Transportation Financial Services Ltd. v. Tarun Bhargava25, this Court reiterated that in cases involving private employment, the scope of judicial review is limited, and the remedies are governed solely by contract law principles. It was affirmed that the rights of the employees

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, vs. MS. HARSHITA MAHESHWARI,

ITA/94/2020HC Rajasthan21 Feb 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

capital of the company. As on 31.03.2020, BCL continues to have a total of 7,70,05,347 shares. The promoters comprises at present 23 companies and societies and one individual i.e. the estate of PDB holding a total of 4,84,34,191 shares equivalent to 62.90% of the total share capital. After elaborately referring to the genesis

M/S FINGROWTH COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/9/2020HC Rajasthan24 Aug 2023

Bench: AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,SAMEER JAIN

capital of the company. As on 31.03.2020, BCL continues to have a total of 7,70,05,347 shares. The promoters comprises at present 23 companies and societies and one individual i.e. the estate of PDB holding a total of 4,84,34,191 shares equivalent to 62.90% of the total share capital. After elaborately referring to the genesis