BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “TDS”+ TDSclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,855Delhi6,786Bangalore3,180Chennai2,865Kolkata2,124Pune1,347Ahmedabad792Patna790Hyderabad786Karnataka743Cochin640Jaipur532Indore439Raipur425Chandigarh389Nagpur321Visakhapatnam223Lucknow199Cuttack181Rajkot171Surat169Jodhpur128Telangana98Ranchi93Panaji88Dehradun87Amritsar87Agra81Guwahati66Jabalpur48Kerala41Calcutta31SC29Allahabad20Varanasi12Rajasthan10Himachal Pradesh8Punjab & Haryana7Orissa5J&K5Uttarakhand3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Bombay1Andhra Pradesh1Gauhati1KURIAN JOSEPH ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 2637Section 116Section 11(2)6TDS6Exemption5Addition to Income5Section 2604Section 13(8)3Section 2(15)3Section 11(3)

C.I.T. CENTRAL, JAIPUR vs. PRADEEP LUNAWAT

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/14/2011HC Rajasthan08 Nov 2019

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

TDS), Palampur, Camp at Shimla …. Respondent. ITA No.57 of 2009 Asstt. Excise & Taxation Commissioner, Una, H.P. .… Appellant. Versus Income

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI BABA MOHAN RAM KALI KHOLI WALE

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/13/2025HC Rajasthan28 Mar 2026

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SHUBHA MEHTA

3
Section 33
Depreciation3
Section 12ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 263

TDS) (hereinafter referred to as “CIT TDS”) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT LTD

ITA/6/2021HC Rajasthan01 Nov 2022

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,KULDEEP MATHUR

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

TDS account of Gracy Babu for assessment year 2011- 12 and had not been claimed by her and hence

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) vs. SHRI RAJENDRA KUMAR JAIN

ITA/279/2018HC Rajasthan17 Dec 2019

Bench: INDRAJIT MAHANTY,INDERJEET SINGH

For Appellant: SRl. A. V. A. SIVA KARTFor Respondent: Sri A. RAMA I{RISHNA REDDY, representing
Section 151Section 260

TDS Circte -2 (.1) , Hyderabad dated 27_02_2017 pan: AAACS4457Q Between: [\//s. Vodafone Mobire Services Lrmited, (Formerrv Mis. Vodafone

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTINOS vs. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/152/2017HC Rajasthan22 Jan 2026

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SANGEETA SHARMA

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 11(3)Section 13(8)Section 2(15)

TDS) on the one hand and not including the Income pertaining to it in the Return is not contrary

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTINOS vs. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/150/2017HC Rajasthan22 Jan 2026

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SANGEETA SHARMA

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 11(3)Section 13(8)Section 2(15)

TDS) on the one hand and not including the Income pertaining to it in the Return is not contrary

C I T JAIPUR vs. J D A JAIPUR

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/284/2010HC Rajasthan22 Jan 2026

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SANGEETA SHARMA

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 11(3)Section 13(8)Section 2(15)

TDS) on the one hand and not including the Income pertaining to it in the Return is not contrary

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I vs. M/S OM METALS INFRA PROJECTS LTD.

Appeals of the department are dismissed, the Appellant do

ITA/121/2019HC Rajasthan26 Mar 2025

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,MANEESH SHARMA

Section 260

TDS) Large Tax Payers Unit J.S.S.Towers, 100ft Ring Road, Banashankari III Stage, Phase 3, Banashankari, Bengaluru-560085. …Respondent (By Sri. K.V.Aravind

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, JAIPUR vs. M/S ANKIT CHIRAG DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

ITA/11/2019HC Rajasthan14 Sept 2023

Bench: AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Section 34

TDS) & Works Contract Tax, retention money, insurance, statutory obligation, notices, fees and charges etc would remain same as mentioned

C.I.T. TDS, JAIPUR vs. M/S HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD.

ITA/65/2014HC Rajasthan11 May 2021

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA

Section 260

Tds], Hyderabad, Hyderabad [34471 ...Appellant Between : AND M/s Jayadarshini Housing pvt.Ltd, Hyderabad, plot No.1246. Level .1, Gorlas Road No.62