THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) vs. SHRI RAJENDRA KUMAR JAIN

Bench: INDRAJIT MAHANTY,INDERJEET SINGH

SECTION OFFICER To 1 2 3 4 A Cl The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "8" , Hyderabad The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-8, Hyderabad The Asst. Commissioner of lncome Tax , TDS

C.I.T. CENTRAL, JAIPUR vs. PRADEEP LUNAWAT

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

4) Under Section 3-A of the said Act, power has been conferred upon the State Government to grant lease of rights to any person to collect toll levied under Section 3 of the Act for respective financial years by auction or tender or combination of both or any other mode on such terms and conditions as the Excise & Taxation

C.I.T. TDS, JAIPUR vs. M/S HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD.

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA

Tds], Hyderabad, Hyderabad [34471 ...Appellant Between : AND M/s Jayadarshini Housing pvt.Ltd, Hyderabad, plot No.1246. Level .1, Gorlas Road No.62, Jubilee Hills] Hyderabati. ... Respondent counsel for the Apperrant(s) : Mr.A.Rama Krishna Reddy, Junior standing Counsel for the lncome Tax Department Counsel for the Respondents : - - - The Court delivered the foilowing : JUDGMENT I THE I{I.)'{OURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KoSHIY

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTINOS vs. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SANGEETA SHARMA

4 of 7) [ITA-150/2017] 5. This Court, while admitting D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 151/2017 framed the following substantial questions of law: “(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon’ble ITAT was justified in allowing Rs.1,02,65,650/- on account of depreciation on fixed assets without appreciating the facts

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTINOS vs. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SANGEETA SHARMA

4 of 7) [ITA-150/2017] 5. This Court, while admitting D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 151/2017 framed the following substantial questions of law: “(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon’ble ITAT was justified in allowing Rs.1,02,65,650/- on account of depreciation on fixed assets without appreciating the facts

C I T JAIPUR vs. J D A JAIPUR

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SANGEETA SHARMA

4 of 7) [ITA-150/2017] 5. This Court, while admitting D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 151/2017 framed the following substantial questions of law: “(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon’ble ITAT was justified in allowing Rs.1,02,65,650/- on account of depreciation on fixed assets without appreciating the facts

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I vs. M/S OM METALS INFRA PROJECTS LTD.

Appeals of the department are dismissed, the Appellant do

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,MANEESH SHARMA

TDS) Large Tax Payers Unit J.S.S.Towers, 100ft Ring Road, Banashankari III Stage, Phase 3, Banashankari, Bengaluru-560085. …Respondent (By Sri. K.V.Aravind, Advocate) ***** -: 2 :- This ITA is filed under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of the order dated 02.05.2018 passed in ITA Nos.2275 & 2276/Bang/2017 for the Assessment Year 2013-2014, praying to (a) Formulate

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, JAIPUR vs. M/S ANKIT CHIRAG DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

Bench: AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH,VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

1. The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 30th October, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP No. 564/2010, which was a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in FAO (OS) 11/2019 Page 2 of 6 short Act of 1996), whereby the learned Single Judge has disposed of the same