BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 201clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,592Delhi1,555Bangalore1,109Chennai652Kolkata465Karnataka257Jaipur162Pune160Nagpur142Raipur138Ahmedabad121Indore103Hyderabad103Cochin96Chandigarh60Jodhpur45Surat44Lucknow43Rajkot41Kerala28Telangana27Panaji26Visakhapatnam22Cuttack20Agra18Patna17Amritsar16SC13Dehradun10Jabalpur10Guwahati9Ranchi9Himachal Pradesh6Varanasi4Rajasthan3Orissa3J&K1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 2637Section 33Section 12A2Section 206C2TDS2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI BABA MOHAN RAM KALI KHOLI WALE

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/13/2025HC Rajasthan28 Mar 2026

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 12ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 263

Section 201(1A) of Rs.2,753/- towards interest. 5. Learned CIT (TDS) also ultimately held that there were specific defects

C.I.T. CENTRAL, JAIPUR vs. PRADEEP LUNAWAT

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA/14/2011HC Rajasthan
08 Nov 2019

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Section 2(13)Section 206CSection 3Section 6

TDS. However, it was held that it would be open to the revenue to seek payment of interest under Section 201

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT LTD

ITA/6/2021HC Rajasthan01 Nov 2022

Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA,KULDEEP MATHUR

For Respondent: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

201 ITR 894 (Karn.); CIT v. 987) 165 ITR 386 (AP); CIT v. Markapakula Agamma (1987) Merchandisers P. Ltd. (1990) 182 ITR 107 (Ker.) In all these decisions, the several High Courts held that if the cost of acquisition of tenancy rights cannot be determined, the consideration received by reason of surrender of such tenancy rights could not be subjected