DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR vs. CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LTD., RAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 2 & 3/Rpr/2023 Co Nos. 19 & 20/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2016-17 & 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Raipur (C.G.)

reassessed has the effect of reducing the loss or converting such loss into income. …………………………… (9) The cases of misreporting of income referred to in sub-section (8) shall be the following, namely:— (a) misrepresentation or suppression of facts; (b) failure to record investments in the books of account; (c) claim of expenditure not substantiated by any evidence; (d) recording

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee company is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 43/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.)-495006 Pan: Aadcs2066E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Bilaspur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

270A of the Act clearly falls within the realm of orders appealable before the CIT(Appeals) u/s. 246A of the Act. We, say so, for the reason that as per Clause (q) to sub-section (1) of Section 246A an order imposing penalty under Chapter XXI of the Act finds place in the orders which are appealable before

M/S R D CONSTRUCTION, BHILAI,BHILAI vs. ITO, WARD-1(5), BHILAI, BHILAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.640/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 M/S. R D Construction Shikshit Nagar, Near Bus Stand, Bhilai Marshalling Yard, Charoda, Bhilai-490 025 (C.G.) Pan: Aajfr3698E

9)(c) of the Act but in the penalty order there is no such specification of the provisions in which penalty is levied and as per 4 M/s. R. D Construction Vs. ITO, Ward-1(5), Bhilai (C.G.) penalty order such levy of penalty has been done u/s. 270A of the Act for both under-reporting and misreporting of income

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIEDS LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BILASPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee company is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 314/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 M/S. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.)-495006 Pan: Aadcs2066E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Bilaspur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

9. We have given a thoughtful consideration and find substance in the claim of the Ld. AR that the CIT(Appeals) had on the basis of his perverse observations dismissed the appeal of the assessee company and held the same as infructuous. As is discernible from the order of the CIT(Appeals), the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed

SUDHA GUPTA,BILASPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, BILASPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 435/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2018-19)

270A on rental Income of Rs. 1459564/- which was already declared in ITR filed. 8. Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming AO’s invocation of Penalty under Sec 271F for not furnishing of ITR which is factually untrue since assessee had filed ITR u/s 139(1). 9. The appellant reserve the right to amend, modify

SHRI VARDHAMAN STHANAKWASI SHRAMAN, DURG,DURG vs. ITO-1(1),BHILAI, BHILAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.662/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri Vardhman Sthanakwasi Shraman Sanghiya Sharavk Sangh Trust Pravin Kumar Jain, Bandha Talab Ganjpara, Durg-491 001 (C.G.) Pan: Aalts4890F .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-1(1), Bhilai (C.G.)

Section 44AD of the Income Tax Act 1961 is not at all applicable to the Appellant. (5) That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the business income determined on presumptive basis @ 8% of gross receipts is quite illegal and bad, both in law and facts. The provision of presumptive income is not at all applicable to the Appellant

OMAX MINERALS PVT LTD., KOLKATA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 415, 416, 417 & 418/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2016-17, 2018-19 & 2019-20 Omax Minerals Private Limited C/O. Subhash Agrawal & Associates, Advocates, Siddha Gibson, 1 Gibson Lane, Suite-213, 2Nd Floor, Kolkata-700 069 Pan: Aabco5774H ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

270A of the Act. 6. That for illustration of facts, parties herein conceded that ITA No.415/RPR/2025 for A.Y. 2014-15 may be referred to. It was contended by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that the Ld.CIT(Appeals) vide an ex- parte order had dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance by the assessee. For the sake of clarity, Para

OMAX MINERALS PVT LTD., KOLKATA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 415, 416, 417 & 418/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2016-17, 2018-19 & 2019-20 Omax Minerals Private Limited C/O. Subhash Agrawal & Associates, Advocates, Siddha Gibson, 1 Gibson Lane, Suite-213, 2Nd Floor, Kolkata-700 069 Pan: Aabco5774H ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

270A of the Act. 6. That for illustration of facts, parties herein conceded that ITA No.415/RPR/2025 for A.Y. 2014-15 may be referred to. It was contended by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that the Ld.CIT(Appeals) vide an ex- parte order had dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance by the assessee. For the sake of clarity, Para

OMAX MINERALS PVT LTD., KOLKATA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 415, 416, 417 & 418/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2016-17, 2018-19 & 2019-20 Omax Minerals Private Limited C/O. Subhash Agrawal & Associates, Advocates, Siddha Gibson, 1 Gibson Lane, Suite-213, 2Nd Floor, Kolkata-700 069 Pan: Aabco5774H ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

270A of the Act. 6. That for illustration of facts, parties herein conceded that ITA No.415/RPR/2025 for A.Y. 2014-15 may be referred to. It was contended by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that the Ld.CIT(Appeals) vide an ex- parte order had dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance by the assessee. For the sake of clarity, Para

OMAX MINERALS PVT LTD., KOLKATA,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 415, 416, 417 & 418/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2016-17, 2018-19 & 2019-20 Omax Minerals Private Limited C/O. Subhash Agrawal & Associates, Advocates, Siddha Gibson, 1 Gibson Lane, Suite-213, 2Nd Floor, Kolkata-700 069 Pan: Aabco5774H ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

270A of the Act. 6. That for illustration of facts, parties herein conceded that ITA No.415/RPR/2025 for A.Y. 2014-15 may be referred to. It was contended by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that the Ld.CIT(Appeals) vide an ex- parte order had dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance by the assessee. For the sake of clarity, Para