SMT. TILOTTAMA JHABAK, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. PCIT-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

reassessment order by disallowing the claim of deduction put forth u/s.54B of the Act and to consequently initiate penalty proceedings

SANKET JHABAK, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

reassessment order by disallowing the claim of deduction put forth u/s.54B of the Act and to consequently initiate penalty proceedings

SANJOG JHABAK, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAIPUR-1, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

reassessment order by disallowing the claim of deduction put forth u/s.54B of the Act and to consequently initiate penalty proceedings

SAMPAT LAL JHABAK, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

reassessment order by disallowing the claim of deduction put forth u/s.54B of the Act and to consequently initiate penalty proceedings

SMT. SUSHILA DEVI JHABAK, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. PCIT-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

reassessment order by disallowing the claim of deduction put forth u/s.54B of the Act and to consequently initiate penalty proceedings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CIRCLE 2(1), RAIPUR vs. MANILAL DAYALJI & COMPANY, DHAMTARI

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood () & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhai (Accountantmember) Ita. No. 62/Rpr/2019 C.O. No. 7/Rpr/2019 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No. 62/Rpr/2019) (Assessment Year: 2008-09) Dcit –(2)(1), Manilal Dayalji & Co., Raipur (C.G.) Vs. Gola Bidi Works, Amapara, Dhamtari Pan No.Aagfm4587N (Revenue) (Assessee) Assessee By : Shri R. B. Doshi, Ca Revenue By : Shri G. N. Singh, Dr Date Of Hearing : 07/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 09/06/2022

deduction had ITA No. 62/RPR/2019 AY: 2008-09 4 DCIT V. Manilal Dayalji & Co. neither filed the audit report in Form No. 10CCB nor a certificate from the competent authority that it was a Small Industrial Undertaking (SSI), reopened its case u/s 147 of the Act. 4. During the course of the reassessment

SHIR BAJRANG POWER AND ISPAT LTD.,RAIPUR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri N. K. Choudhryआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 32/Rpr/2021) ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12)

reassessment was completed on 06.12.2018 as such and tax levied under MAT for Rs. 61299035/- on book profit of Rs. 307563963/-. The regular assessment was completed on 14.03.2014 at nil after allowing deduction

SHRI SHEO BHAGWAN GOEL,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF IMCOME TAX, RAIPUR (CG)

The appeal of the assessee is allowed in aforesaid terms, with no order as to cost

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D. Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 290/Rpr/2016 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013 Sheo Bhagwan Goel 121, Mapel Parthivi Pacific, Ge Road, Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Aikpg 3811 D .......अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. Asstt Commissioner Of Income Tax, .……प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Circle – 4(1), Raipur C.G) Appearances Assessee By : Shri G. S. Agrawal Revenue By : Shri G. N. Singh सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 09/02/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 01/04/2022 आदेश / Order Per Jamlappa D. Battull, Am; The Present Appeal Of The Assessee Is Assailed Against The Order Of The First Appellate Commissioner Of Income Tax - Appeals-1, Raipur [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Vide Order Dt 16/05/2016, Which In Turn Sprung From The Assessment Order [For Short “Ao”] Dt 28/02/2015 Passed By The Ld Assessing Officer [For Short “Ld Ao”] U/S 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”] For Assessment Year [For Short “Ay”] 2012-2013. Itat-Raipur Page 1 Of 9

deductible, then the primary onus is undoubtedly casted upon the claimant assessee to vindicate that, each transaction falling within a particular head of expenditure foretaste litmus test, duly supported by genuine and satisfactory proof [for short “GSP”], accompanied by reasonable explanation. Consequently, during course of assessment or reassessment

AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,RAIPUR vs. DY. COMMSSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.31/Rpr/2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Avinash Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. (Private Limited Company) Avinash House, Maruti Business Park, G.E Road, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001. Pan : Aabcj32884H .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

reassess such income or recompute the loss or the depreciation allowance or any other allowance or deduction for such assessment

INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIVIL LINES, RAIPUR vs. SANDEEP JHABAK, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.418/Rpr/2024 Co No.16/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 The Income Tax Officer-4(1), Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Shri Sandeep Jhabak M/S. Allied Traders, Jhabak Bada, Near Tatyapara, Kamasipara (C.G.)-492 001 Pan: Adnpj2221L ……""यथ" / Respondent

deduction u/s.54B of the Act of Rs.4,76,32,950/-. The A.O while framing the reassessment observed that the subject

CHHATTISGARH STATE BEVERAGE CORPORATION LTD.,RAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 198/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Chhattisgarh State Beverages Corporation Limited Aabkari Bhavan, Chokra Nala, Labhandi, Raipur-492 001 (C.G.) Pan : Aaccc3163B .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-3(1), Raipur. ……""यथ" / Respondent

deduction u/s 37 of the Act “Privilege fees” of Rs. 40 crore its income was reassessed at Rs. 53,79,81,570/-. 6. Aggrieved

PRADEEP KUMAR AGRAWAL, DHAMTARI,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 158, 159 & 160/Rpr/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18)

reassess such income or re-compute the loss or the depreciation allowance or any other allowance or deduction for such

PRADEEP KUMAR AGRAWAL, DHAMTARI,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 158, 159 & 160/Rpr/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18)

reassess such income or re-compute the loss or the depreciation allowance or any other allowance or deduction for such

PRADEEP KUMAR AGRAWAL, DHAMTARI,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 158, 159 & 160/Rpr/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18)

reassess such income or re-compute the loss or the depreciation allowance or any other allowance or deduction for such

DCIT, BHILAI vs. JILLA SAHAKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT, RAJNANDGAON

Appeal stands dismissed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 1/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2014-15)

reassessment proceedings were completed with further additions to the income assessed u/s 143(3) with regard to (i) Addition for double claim of deduction

DY.C.I.T. 1, BHILAI(CG) vs. M/S RAVI SHREE NARAYAN TRANSPORT, BHILAI(CG)

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

reassessment proceedings u/s.147 of the Act after receipt of verification report from ACIT (TDS), Raipur stating that the assessee has made certain payments without deduction

DY.C.I.T. 1, BHILAI(CG) vs. M/S RAVI SHREE NARAYAN TRANSPORT, BHILAI(CG)

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

reassessment proceedings u/s.147 of the Act after receipt of verification report from ACIT (TDS), Raipur stating that the assessee has made certain payments without deduction

THE DY. CIT- 1,, DURG(CG) vs. M/S. RAVI SHREE NARAYAN TRANSPORT,, BHILAI(CG)

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

reassessment proceedings u/s.147 of the Act after receipt of verification report from ACIT (TDS), Raipur stating that the assessee has made certain payments without deduction