Search: condonation of delay

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 282clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(2)11 Section 1487 Section 282A(1)7 Limitation/Time-bar7 Section 133(6)6 TDS6 Addition to Income6 Reassessment6 Condonation of Delay

M/S RADHE SHYAM BENI SHYAM KESARY & COMPANY,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICDRF, WARDF 1(2), BILASPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 33/RPR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.33/Rpr/2018 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) M/S Radhe Shyam Beni Shyam Vs Ito, Ward-1(2), Bilaspur Kesary & Company, Dayalband, Nariyal Kothi, Bilaspur (C.G.) Pan No. : Aahfr 1307 G (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Nitish Tiwari & Mrs. SummedhaFor Respondent: Shri G.N.Singh, Sr. DR

Section 269SSection 271Section 271D

condone the delay in filing the present appeal and appeal is heard finally. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling of cement hume pipe and cement product and filed its return of income on 30.09.2009 electronically declaring total income at Rs.2,04,950/-. Thereafter the AO completed

M/S RADHE SHYAM BENI SHYAM KESARY & COMPANY,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICDRF, WARDF 1(2), BILASPUR

M/S RADHE SHYAM BENI SHYAM KESARY & COMPANY,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICDRF, WARDF 1(2), BILASPUR

MOHAMMED USMAN, BHILAI,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(1), BHILAI, DURG

RAMAN VASU THACHISARIL, KOLLAM, KOLLAM vs. ITO, WARD- JAGDALPUR, JAGDALPUR

MANOJ KUMAR SAHU, DURG,DURG vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), BHILAI, DURG

LEELADHAR CHANDRAKAR, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), BHILAI, DURG

NEELAM CHANDRAKAR, RAJNANDGAON,RAJNANDGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), BHILAI, DURG

LEELADHAR CHANDRAKAR, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 (3), BHILAI, DURG

KUNJ BIHARI DAWA DUKAN, AMBIKAPUR,SURGUJA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAIPUR-1, RAIPUR