RAM CHAND PANJWANI, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed in terms of my aforesaid observations
ITA 151/RPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur06 Nov 2023AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 151/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Ram Chand Panjwani M/S. Gurunanak Rice Mill, Vill : Tulshi, P.O. Tilda, Neora, Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Afbpp5595D .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-1(2), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent
For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)
27,500/-. However, A.O did not find fafour with the aforesaid explanation of the assessee. The A.O observed that the invoices of the aforesaid suppliers were
5
Ram Chand Panjwani Vs. ITO-1(2), Raipur (C.G.) not supported by delivery challan. Also the A.O noticed that the modes of inward transport and mandi passage, Anuga etc. were not available with