DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 4(1), RAIPUR vs. MESERSS CHHATTISGARH STATEELECTRICITY BOARD, RAIPUR

ITA 31/RPR/2020Status: DisposedITAT Raipur25 September 2023AY 2006-07Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI ARUN KHODPIA (Accountant Member)52 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that a reassessment order does not wipe out the original assessment order. The CIT(Appeals) erred in dismissing the appeal in limine based on this incorrect premise.

What were the facts?

The revenue appealed against the CIT(Appeals) order which dismissed the appeal, holding that the original assessment order was no longer in existence after a reassessment order was passed. The CIT(Appeals) believed a reassessment order wipes out the original assessment.

What were the issues?

Whether a reassessment order extinguishes the original assessment order, and if so, whether the appeal against the original order can be dismissed on that ground.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(11)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR

Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA

For Appellant: shri Praveen Khandelwal & Praveen
For Respondent: Dr. Simran Bhullar, CIT-DR
Hearing: 27.06.2023Pronounced: 25.09.2023

PER RAVISH SOOD, JM: The present appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(Appeals), Raipur dated 22.01.2009, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O. u/s.143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘Act’), dated 29.11.2007 for A.Y. 2006-07. The revenue has assailed the impugned order on the following grounds of appeal before us:

“1. That the

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →