DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 4(1), RAIPUR vs. MESERSS CHHATTISGARH STATEELECTRICITY BOARD, RAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a reassessment order does not wipe out the original assessment order. The CIT(Appeals) erred in dismissing the appeal in limine based on this incorrect premise.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the CIT(Appeals) order which dismissed the appeal, holding that the original assessment order was no longer in existence after a reassessment order was passed. The CIT(Appeals) believed a reassessment order wipes out the original assessment.
What were the issues?
Whether a reassessment order extinguishes the original assessment order, and if so, whether the appeal against the original order can be dismissed on that ground.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(11)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji3,926 citing167 ITR 471 · 1987 · SC
- CIT v. Sun Engineering Works (P) Ltd.814 citing198 ITR 297 · 1992 · SC · Read judgment
- 254 ITR 657 (Del); Hardillia Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT172 citing75 ITR 373 · 1970 · SC
- CIT v. Alagendran Finance Ltd.129 citing293 ITR 1 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- Cases 733 and Commissioner of Income-tax v. West Bengal Infrastructure Development Finance Corporation53 citing334 ITR 269 · 2011 · SC
- Office of the Chief Post Master General v. Living Media India Ltd.50 citing348 ITR 7 · 2012 · SC
- CIT v. HUF of H.H. Late J.M. Scindia16 citing300 ITR 193 · 2008 · HC
- ITO v. K.L. Srihari (HUF)16 citing250 ITR 193 · 2001 · SC
- Marathwada University v. Seshrao Balwant Rao Chavan15 citing3 SCC 132 · 1996
- 13 citing
- 176. 22 DCIT, Circle-4(1), Raipur v. M/s. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board (x). State of Nagaland v. Lipok Ao3 citing3 SCC 752 · 2005
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM: The present appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(Appeals), Raipur dated 22.01.2009, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O. u/s.143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘Act’), dated 29.11.2007 for A.Y. 2006-07. The revenue has assailed the impugned order on the following grounds of appeal before us:
“1. That the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026