BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai311Delhi226Pune183Chennai165Ahmedabad159Kolkata134Jaipur129Surat104Bangalore101Rajkot56Hyderabad43Amritsar38Lucknow36Indore34Chandigarh31Nagpur27Cuttack14Agra14Cochin10Jodhpur9Visakhapatnam8Karnataka8Panaji8Raipur7Allahabad7Ranchi6Jabalpur5Dehradun5Calcutta4Patna3Telangana3Punjab & Haryana2SC1Varanasi1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 12A32Section 80G22Exemption7Section 12A(1)(ac)6Section 80G(5)5Section 80G(5)(iii)2Natural Justice2Limitation/Time-bar2Charitable Trust

SINDHU YOUTH ASSOCIATION,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 29/RPR/2019[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur28 Jul 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.29/Rpr/2019 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2018-2019) Sindhu Youth Association, Vs Cit(Exemption), Bhopal Sindhu Bhawan, Sector-4, Devendra Nagar, Raipur Pan No. : Aakts 3401 K (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, Smt. Laxmi Sharma & Shri Vimal Agrawal, Cas राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri G.N.Singh, Sr. Dr सुनिाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 27/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 29/07/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am : This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Cit(E), Bhopal, Dated 24.12.2018 For The Assessment Year 2018-2019. 2. The Sole Ground Raised By The Assessee In This Appeal Is Against The Action Of The Cit(E) In Rejecting The Application Of The Assessee Filed For Exemption U/S.80G Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Society Running Charitable Organization Registered U/S 12A Of The Income Tax Act, Which Was Granted Vide Order Dated 28.03.2008, Mainly Engaged In Charitable Activities For The Welfare Of Society Including Relief Of Poor, Blood Donation & Blood Infusion Camps For Thalassemia Patients & Medical Relief For The Poor, Etc. The Office Of The Society Is Situated At Devendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.). The Assessee Society Had Filed An Application For Exemption U/S 80G Of The Act In Form No. 10G On 07/06/2018. However

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, Smt. LaxmiFor Respondent: Shri G.N.Singh, Sr. DR
Section 11(2)
2
Section 12A
Section 13(1)(b)
Section 80G
Section 80G(5)
Section 80G(5)(i)
Section 80G(5)(vi)

Trust (1975) (SC) disapproved by Surat Art Silk (1979) (SC) 6. Apart from the above written synopsis, ld. AR has also filed paper book, containing pages 1 to 119 and submitted that there is no finding in the entire order of CIT(E) vis-à-vis the genuineness of the activities carried put by the assessee-society. Therefore, the activities

SRI SHIRDI SAI BABA SATSANG SEVA CHARITABLE TRUST,BHILAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 201/RPR/2019[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Oct 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.201/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :Na) Sri Shirdi Sai Baba Satsang Seva Vs Cit(Exemption), Bhopal Charitable Trust, Plot No.98, Pragati Nagar, Risali, Bhilai, Dist : Durgq Pan No. : Aaits 4066 J (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri R.B.Doshi, Ca राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri P.Kmishra, Cit-Dr सुनिाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 04/08/2022 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17/10/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am : This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Cit(E), Bhopal, Dated 30.09.2019. 2. The Sole Ground Raised By The Assessee In This Appeal Is Against The Action Of The Cit(E) In Rejecting The Application Of The Assessee Filed For Exemption U/S.80G Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Trust Filed An Application Seeking Approval U/S.80G Of The Act In Form No.10G On 08.03.2019. The Cit(E) Rejected The Application Of The Assessee Holding That The Genuineness Of The Activities Of The Assessee Could Not Verified. 4. Against The Rejection Of Application Of The Assessee For Approval U/S.80G Of The Act By The Cit(E), The Assessee Is Now In Appeal Before The Tribunal.

For Appellant: Shri R.B.Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri P.KMishra, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

Charitable trust--Recognition under section 80G(c)(5)Surplus in hands of assessee society--In the present case, once the Tribunal had found that after depreciation and deducting the capital expenditure out of gross receipts, there was no surplus in the hands of the society, therefore, there was no violation of section 11 and there was no requirement to furnish

SAMARPIT SEVA SANSTHA SUKMA,DHULE vs. ITO, WARD JAGDALPUR, JAGDALPUR

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 457/RPR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Aakash Parakh, Adv. [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Saad Kidwai [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

ii)(B) and 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short 'the Act'] vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2025-26/1077303348 (1) & 1077303436 (1) both dt. 21/06/2025. ITAT-Raipur Page 1 of 8 Samarpit Seva Sanstha, Sukma Vs CIT(E), Bhopal ITA No. 457 & 463/RPR/2025 2. Since facts & solitary issue involved in these twin appeals are identical, common & interrelated

SAMARPIT SEVA SANSTHA SUKMA,DHULE vs. ITO, WARD JAGDALPUR, JADALPUR

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 463/RPR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Mr Aakash Parakh, Adv. [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Saad Kidwai [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

ii)(B) and 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short 'the Act'] vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2025-26/1077303348 (1) & 1077303436 (1) both dt. 21/06/2025. ITAT-Raipur Page 1 of 8 Samarpit Seva Sanstha, Sukma Vs CIT(E), Bhopal ITA No. 457 & 463/RPR/2025 2. Since facts & solitary issue involved in these twin appeals are identical, common & interrelated

DISHA EDUCATION SOCIETY,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result ground of the appeal in the instant appeal of the assessee are allowed

ITA 32/RPR/2019[0]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 Jun 2023

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.32&60/Rpr/2019 (Assessment Year:) M/S Disha Education Society, Vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Disha Crown, Katchana Road. Exemption, Bhopal Shankar Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Pan No. :Aaatd5249C : Shri R.B.Doshi, Ca "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri V.K.Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 26/04/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/06/2023

For Respondent: Shri V.K.Singh, CIT-DR
Section 12A

ii)] of case law compilation - Allegation based on some non descript and vague information received by CIT(E) in respect of donor. - PN 47 [para no. (11)] of case law compilation Vague and non descript statement u/s 133A does not carry evidentiary value in absence of tangible evidence to corroborate the assertion. - PN 48 [para no. (iii)] of case

DISHA EDUCATION SOCIETY,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result ground of the appeal in the instant appeal of the assessee are allowed

ITA 60/RPR/2019[0]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 Jun 2023

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.32&60/Rpr/2019 (Assessment Year:) M/S Disha Education Society, Vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Disha Crown, Katchana Road. Exemption, Bhopal Shankar Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Pan No. :Aaatd5249C : Shri R.B.Doshi, Ca "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri V.K.Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 26/04/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/06/2023

For Respondent: Shri V.K.Singh, CIT-DR
Section 12A

ii)] of case law compilation - Allegation based on some non descript and vague information received by CIT(E) in respect of donor. - PN 47 [para no. (11)] of case law compilation Vague and non descript statement u/s 133A does not carry evidentiary value in absence of tangible evidence to corroborate the assertion. - PN 48 [para no. (iii)] of case

DIGNITY EDUCATION SOCIETY,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 31/RPR/2019[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhaiआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 31/Rpr/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Dignity Education Society Lunawat Bhawan, Station Road, Raipur (C.G) Pan : Aabtd0634J .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Exemption) Income Tax Office, Ii, Iii & Iv Floors, Metro Walk Building, E-5, Arera Colony, Bittan Market, Bhopal (M.P) 462016 ……""यथ" / Respondent Assessee By : Shri R. B. Doshi Revenue By : Shri P. K. Mishra सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 07.06.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09.06.2022

For Appellant: Shri R. B. DoshiFor Respondent: Shri P. K. Mishra
Section 12ASection 80G

ii) The society is not involved in any other activities on mentioned in application Form 10G. 4. Further from the report of Income Tax Inspector and Assessing Officer, it has been observed that the society is not carrying out any other activities except running of Dignity College of Architecture. During the spot verification by the Income Tax Inspector, he found