BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 80P(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore22Visakhapatnam19Delhi13Mumbai8Kolkata8Pune4Hyderabad3Lucknow2Nagpur2Indore1Chennai1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)18Section 80P(2)(d)13Section 26311Section 143(3)7Section 143(2)4Deduction4Section 80P3Section 563Business Income3

SAR SENAPATI UMABAI DABHADE NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTA MARYADIT,PUNE vs. PCIT-3, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 908/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay S. SuryawanshiFor Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 57Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

4) even though without any amendment in section 8OP(2)(d) is sufficient to deny the claim of the assessee for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). 8.1 Coming to the decisions cited by the assessee of the jurisdictional Tribunal on the issue, with due respect it may be mentioned that as pointed out hereinabove, both the Hon'ble Apex

SHREENATH MHASKOBA CREDIT CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD.,PUNE vs. THE PCIT, PUNE-4, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 488/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay SuryawanshiFor Respondent: Shri Vishwas S. Mundhe
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194NSection 263Section 56Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

4) even though without any amendment in section 80P(2)(d) is sufficient to deny the claim of the assessee for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). 9. The assessee has also argued that if interest income is to be treated as income from other sources then deduction u/s 57 should also be given. However, this argument is not acceptable

PUNE MADHYAMIK SHIKSHAK SAHKARI PATAPEDHI MARYADIT,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,PUNE 4, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 909/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: HeardITAT Pune03 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Sharad A ShahFor Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde, CIT
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 56Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

4) even though without any amendment in section 80P(2)(d) is sufficient to deny the claim of the assessee for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). 9. The assessee has submitted while adjudicating appeals on similar issue, the decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court, various Hon'ble High courts and ITAT Bench. The fact of the case law submitted

GURUDEODATTA NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA LIMITED,PUNE vs. THE PCIT IT-4, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 487/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay SuryawanshiFor Respondent: Shri Vishwas S. Mundhe
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 56Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

4) even though without any amendment in section 80P(2)(d) is sufficient to deny the claim of the assessee for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). 9. The assessee has submitted while adjudicating appeals on similar issue, the Pune Bench of the ITAT has upheld the admissibility of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(1) on interest earned on investments