GENDER LAB FOUNDATION,THANE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose
ITA 193/PUN/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Apr 2024
Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.193/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :- Gender Lab Foundation, The Commissioner Of Flat No.2203-4, A Wing, Vs Income Tax, Tribeca Building, Hiranandani Exemption, Pune. Estate, G B Road, Chitalsar Manpada, B.O., Thane. Maharashtra – 400607. Pan: Aajcg4122B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri Keyur Patel – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 29/04/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 30/04/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is Assessee’S Appeal Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption), Pune Under Section 80G Of The Act, Dated 15.12.2023. The Ld.Cit(E) Dismissed The Application Of The Assessee On The Ground That The Application Is Time Barred. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Ground(S) Of Appeal : “1. The Cit E, Failed To Appreciate That The Appellant, Gender Lab Gender Lab Foundation [A]
Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)
Section 80G(5) of the Act. This will be the harmonious interpretation.
11. In this context, we will like to refer to observations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of K P Varghase(supra), where in the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed as under :
Quote, “It is a well-recognised rule of construction that a statutory provision