Search: transfer pricing

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 35Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi51 Mumbai15 Chandigarh3 Pune3 Bangalore3 Hyderabad3 Kolkata3 Dehradun2 Jaipur1 Ahmedabad1 Chennai1 Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 270A8 Section 143(1)(a)2 Section 143(2)2 Section 270A(6)(a)2 Section 1312 Section 270A(9)2 Section 270A(3)(i)2 Section 1432 Penalty2

SPECTRAFORCE TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 5, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 2853/PUN/2024[AY 2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2025

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri S. Raghunathan and Shri Abhiroop Bhargav KFor Respondent: Shri Prakash L. Pathade

Section 143(3)Section 92C(3)

section 92C(3) and Rule 10B(3) are satisfied in the present case. 8. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. AO/Ld. TPO/DRP has erred in enhancing the income of Appellant by Rs. 2,90,89,437 while holding that the Appellant's international transaction pertaining to provision of Staff 8 Augmentation Service

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRADHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are

SPECTRAFORCE TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 5, PUNE, PUNE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRADHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON

SPECTRAFORCE TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 5, PUNE, PUNE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRADHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRAHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON