BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi540Mumbai130Karnataka74Kolkata57Calcutta54Chennai33Telangana24Jaipur22Bangalore19Ahmedabad12SC11Dehradun10Surat7Nagpur7Pune6Lucknow5Hyderabad5Amritsar4Indore4Chandigarh3Kerala3Allahabad3Orissa2Cochin2Visakhapatnam1Andhra Pradesh1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Jodhpur1Rajasthan1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)(a)8Section 270A8Section 143(3)6Disallowance5Section 143(2)4Section 14A3Section 144C(13)3Section 144C3Transfer Pricing3

TDK ELECTRONICS AG, (FORMERLY KNOWN AS EPCOS AG),,NASHIK vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (IT), CIRCLE -1,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 1810/PUN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Feb 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Raviिनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Tdk Electronics Ag Vs. Acit (It), (Formerly Known As Epcos Ag) Circle-1, Pune C/O. Epcos India Pvt. Ltd., E-22-25, Midc Satpur, Nashik 422 007 Pan : Aaace9787H Appellant Respondent

Section 144CSection 144C(13)Section 144C(2)

Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for determining the arm’s length price (ALP) of the international transactions. Pursuant to the order passed by the TPO, the AO passed a draft order dated 21.12.2018 determining total income at Rs.33.48 crore by making an addition of Rs.38,77,566/- on account of `Income from fees for technical services’. The draft order was admittedly

DCIT, SWARGATE PUNE vs. CUMMINS INDIA LTD , PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Addition to Income3
Section 270A(6)(a)2
Penalty2
ITA 1256/PUN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Dec 2025AY 2018-19
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 14ASection 250Section 80JSection 92C

Section 260A of\nthe Income Tax Act 1961 (the Act) against the order dated\n28th September 2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate\nTribunal (ITAT) for A.Y.2015-2016, 2016-2017 and 2017-\n2018. The issue is in respect of transfer pricing

CUMMINS INDIA LIMITED,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1),, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 632/PUN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Dec 2025AY 2018-19
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 14ASection 250Section 80JSection 92C

Section 260A of\nthe Income Tax Act 1961 (the Act) against the order dated\n28th September 2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate\nTribunal (ITAT) for A.Y.2015-2016, 2016-2017 and 2017-\n2018. The issue is in respect of transfer pricing

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRAHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are

ITA 1940/PUN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Dec 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Sanket M JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 131Section 143Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 270ASection 270A(3)(i)Section 270A(6)(a)Section 270A(9)

Transfer Pricing Officer, where the assessee had maintained 13 ITA.Nos.1939 & 1940/PUN./2024 information and documents as prescribed under section 92D, declared the international transaction under Chapter X, and, disclosed all the material facts relating to the transaction; and (e) the amount of undisclosed income referred to in section 271AAB. (7) The penalty referred to in sub-section (1) shall

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRADHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are

ITA 1939/PUN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Sanket M JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 131Section 143Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 270ASection 270A(3)(i)Section 270A(6)(a)Section 270A(9)

Transfer Pricing Officer, where the assessee had maintained 13 ITA.Nos.1939 & 1940/PUN./2024 information and documents as prescribed under section 92D, declared the international transaction under Chapter X, and, disclosed all the material facts relating to the transaction; and (e) the amount of undisclosed income referred to in section 271AAB. (7) The penalty referred to in sub-section (1) shall

BHIMA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,,PUNE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RANGE - 3,, PUNE

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 2177/PUN/2017[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Apr 2022AY 1997-98

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripotem/S. Bhima Sahakari Sahkar Jcit, Special Range - 3 Karkhana Ltd. Aaykar Bhavan Vs. A/P Madhukarar Nagar Swargate, Pune 411009 Tal. Daund, Dist Pune 413801 Pan – Aaatb1781B Appellant Respondent Appellant By: None Respondent By: Shri S.P. Walimbe Date Of Hearing: 21.04.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28.04.2022 O R D E R Per S.S. Godara, Jm This Assessee’S Appeal For Ay 1997-98 Is Against The Order Of The Cit(A) - 2, Pune Dated 04.07.2017 Passed In Case No. Pn/Cit (A)-2/Set Aside/Pn/66/2011-12.755 Involving Proceedings Under Section 143(3) R.W.S. 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 In Short The Act.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S.P. Walimbe
Section 143(3)

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in short the Act. 2. Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s behalf. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte. The assessee’s first and foremost substantial ground raised in the instant case seeks to reverse both the lower authorities action rejecting its stand of having not treated an amount of Rs.1