BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

212 results for “transfer pricing”+ Depreciationclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,682Delhi1,417Bangalore714Chennai413Kolkata290Ahmedabad289Pune212Hyderabad167Chandigarh109Jaipur97Cochin81Indore48Surat44Visakhapatnam38Karnataka32Raipur26Lucknow24SC20Rajkot18Telangana13Cuttack10Nagpur8Ranchi8Jodhpur7Kerala7Amritsar6Guwahati4Dehradun4Agra4Calcutta3Panaji3Rajasthan2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Allahabad1Jabalpur1Varanasi1Patna1Orissa1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)82Addition to Income76Disallowance44Transfer Pricing43Depreciation39Comparables/TP33Section 12A32Section 115J31Section 3531Section 92C

FAURECIA INTERIOR SYSTEMS INDIA P. LTD.,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 781/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 May 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra AgiwalFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 92C(2)

Transfer Pricing proceedings. Further, AO did not grant working capital adjustment too. 6. Further, regarding the non-TP issues, the AO noticed the requirement of changing the mode of computation of allowable deduction u/s.10A of the Act qua the stage at which the brought forward depreciation/business losses can be given set off from the total income of the assessee

MERCEDES-BENZ INDIA PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DAIMLER CHRYSLER INDIA PVT. LTD),PUNE vs. ASST. CIT, CIRCLE-8, PUNE

Showing 1–20 of 212 · Page 1 of 11

...
25
Deduction24
Section 10(20)20

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed, appeal of Revenue is dismissed and cross objections of assessee are dismissed

ITA 1083/PUN/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Oct 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1083/Pun/2013 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2005-06 Mercedes-Benz India Pvt. Ltd., (Formerly Known As Daimler Chrysler India Pvt. Ltd.) E-3, Midc Chakan, Phase – Iii, Chakan Industrial Area, Kuruli & Nighoje, Tal. Khed, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 410501 …. Pan: Aabcm1789L Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle – 8, Pune

For Appellant: S/Shri Pramod Achuthan, Rajendra Agiwal
Section 143(3)

depreciation under section 32 of the Act should be allowed on capitalized Project Assistance Technical Fees. 7. First, we take up the appeal of assessee. The issue raised in the appeal filed by assessee is against transfer pricing

DY. CIT, CIRCLE-9, PUNE vs. MERCEDES BENZ I PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DAIMLER CHRYSLER I PVT. LTD), PUNE

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed, appeal of Revenue is dismissed and cross objections of assessee are dismissed

ITA 1110/PUN/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Oct 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1083/Pun/2013 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2005-06 Mercedes-Benz India Pvt. Ltd., (Formerly Known As Daimler Chrysler India Pvt. Ltd.) E-3, Midc Chakan, Phase – Iii, Chakan Industrial Area, Kuruli & Nighoje, Tal. Khed, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 410501 …. Pan: Aabcm1789L Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle – 8, Pune

For Appellant: S/Shri Pramod Achuthan, Rajendra Agiwal
Section 143(3)

depreciation under section 32 of the Act should be allowed on capitalized Project Assistance Technical Fees. 7. First, we take up the appeal of assessee. The issue raised in the appeal filed by assessee is against transfer pricing

REHAU POLYMERS PVT. LTD.,,PUNE vs. ASISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 519/PUN/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Mar 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 519/Pun/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil Pathak
Section 143(3)

Transfer Pricing Officer defended his action by observing that even if services were rendered, they were in the nature of duplicate services and the assessee has not produced evidence to justify the price paid for such services and no independent enterprise would have paid any separate consideration for such services. 6.3 The ld. AR submitted that Rehau Pte Ltd., Singapore

MINDA RINDER PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-10, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 2035/PUN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Feb 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Raviिनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Minda Rinder Private Limited, Vs. Acit, Circle-10, Gat No.148, Mahalunge Ingale, Pune Off. Chakan Talegaon Road, Taluka Khed, Dist. Pune – 410501 Maharashtra Pan : Aaach4211R Appellant Respondent Assessee By Ms. Pallavi Dinodia Revenue By Shri Krishna Kumar Mishra Date Of Hearing 15-02-2021 Date Of Pronouncement 16-02-2021 आदेश / Order

Section 143(3)

transfer pricing adjustment directly, as these are neither considered as the operating costs or operating revenue. Their ALP determination assumes significance only for the purpose of allowing depreciation

TETRA PAK INDIA PRIVATE LTD.,,PUNE vs. DY.CIT, CIR.7, PUNE, PUNE

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 111/PUN/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Aug 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.111/Pun/2011 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07 Tetra Pak India Private Ltd., Mayfair Towers, Wakdewadi, Shivajinagar, Pune-411005. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Aaact3467B बनाम / V/S. Dcit, Circle-7, ……""यथ" / Respondent Pune. Assessee By : Shri Nikhil Pathak Revenue By : Shri S. B. Prasad सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 02.07.2019 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 27.08.2019 आदेश / Order Per D. Karunakara Rao, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of Assessing Officer/Tpo/Drp For The Assessment Year 2006-07. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Are As Under :- “Based On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, Tetra Pak India Private Limited (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Appellant’) Respectfully Craves Leave To Prefer An Appeal Under Section 253(1)(D) Of The Income- Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Act’), Against The Order Dated 25 November 2010 Passed By The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax- Circle 7 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Assessing Officer’) Under Section 143(3) Read With Section 144C(13) Of The Act In Pursuance Of The Directions Dated 20 September 2010 Issued By The Honorable Dispute Resolution Panel (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Honorable Drp’), On The Following Grounds: On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Honorable Drp & Consequentially The Learned Ao Have: I Grounds Of Objections In Respect Of Transfer Pricing Adjustment

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri S. B. Prasad
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 253(1)(d)

depreciation charged by the Appellant and the comparable companies, while computing the operating margin of the Appellant. 12. Proposing the transfer pricing

M/S. CHEMETALL RAI INDIA LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1720/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Dec 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chadhury

depreciation on the ALP of the international transaction of purchase price at Rs.90), due to the transfer pricing addition w.r.t

M/S. CARRARO INDIA PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1260/PUN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Feb 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Vikas Awasthy

Section 143(3)

Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). The Revenue in its appeal is aggrieved by the direction of the ld. CIT(A) to treat the entire amount of royalty as a revenue expense as against capital expenditure taken by the AO. 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee, an Indian company

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1),, PUNE vs. M/S. CARRARO INDIA PVT.LTD,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1308/PUN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Feb 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Vikas Awasthy

Section 143(3)

Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). The Revenue in its appeal is aggrieved by the direction of the ld. CIT(A) to treat the entire amount of royalty as a revenue expense as against capital expenditure taken by the AO. 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee, an Indian company

NALCO WATER INDIA LIMITED,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -2, , PUNE

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1892/PUN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune02 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm Assessment Year:2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ketan VedFor Respondent: Shri Shivaji B. More
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 92C(3)

transfer pricing adjustments totaling to INR 32,37,89,951 to the value of various international transactions. 2 Nalco Water India Ltd. A.Y. 2014-15. b. The AO has also erred in disallowing depreciation

M/S. HYUNDAI CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT INDIA P. LTD.,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed and that of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 584/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Aug 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Raviनिर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Acit, Circle 9, Vs. M/S. Hyundai Construction Pune Equipment India Private Limited Plot No.A-2, Chakan Midc, Phase-Ii, Chakan-Talegaon Road, Village- Khalumbre, Tal-Khed, Pune – 410501 Pan: Aabch8756Q Appellant Respondent निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Hyundai Construction Equipment Vs. Acit, Circle 9, India Private Limited Pune Plot No.A-2, Chakan Midc, Phase-Ii, Chakan-Talegaon Road, Village- Khalumbre, Tal-Khed, Pune – 410501 Pa N: Aabch8756Q Appellant Respondent Corrigendum Per R.S.Syal, Vp :

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)

depreciation as fixed cost instead of following the methodology prescribed in Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT’s ruling in case of Petro Araldite Private Limited [(2014) 160 TTJ 319 (Mumbai Trib)] which is affirmed by Hon’ble Bombay High Court and which is further considered in Appellant’s own case for AY 2009-10 and AY 2010-11. Ground of appeal

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, PUNE vs. M/S. HYUNDAI CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT INDIA PVT. LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed and that of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 537/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Aug 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Raviनिर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Acit, Circle 9, Vs. M/S. Hyundai Construction Pune Equipment India Private Limited Plot No.A-2, Chakan Midc, Phase-Ii, Chakan-Talegaon Road, Village- Khalumbre, Tal-Khed, Pune – 410501 Pan: Aabch8756Q Appellant Respondent निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Hyundai Construction Equipment Vs. Acit, Circle 9, India Private Limited Pune Plot No.A-2, Chakan Midc, Phase-Ii, Chakan-Talegaon Road, Village- Khalumbre, Tal-Khed, Pune – 410501 Pa N: Aabch8756Q Appellant Respondent Corrigendum Per R.S.Syal, Vp :

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)

depreciation as fixed cost instead of following the methodology prescribed in Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT’s ruling in case of Petro Araldite Private Limited [(2014) 160 TTJ 319 (Mumbai Trib)] which is affirmed by Hon’ble Bombay High Court and which is further considered in Appellant’s own case for AY 2009-10 and AY 2010-11. Ground of appeal

MERCEDES-BENZ INDIA PVT. LTD.,,PUNE vs. ASST. COMM. OF INCOME-TAX,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 10/PUN/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Apr 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1468/Pun/2010 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2006-07 Mercedes-Benz India Pvt. Ltd., E-3, Midc Chakan, Phase – Iii, Chakan Industrial Area, Kuruli & Nighoje, Tal. Khed, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 410501 …. Pan: Aabcm1789L Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle – 9, Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.10/Pun/2012 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2007-08 Mercedes-Benz India Pvt. Ltd., E-3, Midc Chakan, Phase – Iii, Chakan Industrial Area, Kuruli & Nighoje, Tal. Khed, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 410501 …. Pan: Aabcm1789L Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle – 9, Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.298/Pun/2013 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Mercedes-Benz India Pvt. Ltd., E-3, Midc Chakan, Phase – Iii, Chakan Industrial Area, Kuruli & Nighoje, Tal. Khed, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 410501 …. Pan: Aabcm1789L Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle – 9, Pune : Shri Pramod Achuthan : Ms. Nandita Kanchan Revenue By घोषणा की तारीख / सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 30.04.2019 Date Of Hearing : 12.02.2019

Section 143(3)Section 92C(2)

Pricing Authority. The TPO had adopted the arm's length royalty rate @ 3% as against 5% paid by the assessee and accordingly, suggested disallowance of ₹ 2.62 crores. The Assessing Officer noted that in earlier years, even the balance royalty was disallowed as capital expenditure. So, the assessee was show caused in this regard, against which the assessee filed submissions which

MERCEDES BENZ INDIA PVT. LTD.,,PUNE vs. ACIT CIR.9,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 1468/PUN/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Apr 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1468/Pun/2010 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2006-07 Mercedes-Benz India Pvt. Ltd., E-3, Midc Chakan, Phase – Iii, Chakan Industrial Area, Kuruli & Nighoje, Tal. Khed, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 410501 …. Pan: Aabcm1789L Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle – 9, Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.10/Pun/2012 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2007-08 Mercedes-Benz India Pvt. Ltd., E-3, Midc Chakan, Phase – Iii, Chakan Industrial Area, Kuruli & Nighoje, Tal. Khed, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 410501 …. Pan: Aabcm1789L Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle – 9, Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.298/Pun/2013 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Mercedes-Benz India Pvt. Ltd., E-3, Midc Chakan, Phase – Iii, Chakan Industrial Area, Kuruli & Nighoje, Tal. Khed, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 410501 …. Pan: Aabcm1789L Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle – 9, Pune : Shri Pramod Achuthan : Ms. Nandita Kanchan Revenue By घोषणा की तारीख / सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 30.04.2019 Date Of Hearing : 12.02.2019

Section 143(3)Section 92C(2)

Pricing Authority. The TPO had adopted the arm's length royalty rate @ 3% as against 5% paid by the assessee and accordingly, suggested disallowance of ₹ 2.62 crores. The Assessing Officer noted that in earlier years, even the balance royalty was disallowed as capital expenditure. So, the assessee was show caused in this regard, against which the assessee filed submissions which

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, PUNE vs. BEKAERT INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 541/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.571/Pun/2015 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Bekaert Industries Private Vs. Dcit, Circle-1(1), Limited, Pune Plot No.127, Sr.No.232/1+2, Friends Co-Operative Hsg. Soc., New Airport Road, Behind Idbi, Sakore Nagar, Vimannagar, Pune – 411 014 Pan : Aaacb8571E Appellant Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.541/Pun/2015 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Circle-1(1), Vs. Bekaert Industries Private Pune Limited, Plot No.B-1, Midc, Ranjangaon, Tal Shirur, Dist. Pune 419210 Pan : Aaacb8571E Appellant Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.976/Pun/2016 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Bekaert Industries Private Limited, Vs. Dcit, Circle-1(1), Plot No.127, Sr.No.232/1+2, Pune Friends Co-Operative Hsg. Soc., New Airport Road, Behind Idbi, Sakore Nagar, Vimannagar, Pune – 411 014 Pan : Aaacb8571E Appellant Respondent Shri T. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy

Section 143(3)

transfer pricing addition of Rs.7,39,20,120/- in the international transaction of Import of raw materials. The assessee is aggrieved by the addition to this extent. 4. We have heard the rival submissions and gone through the relevant material on record. The ld. AR has placed on record international transaction wise chart showing the issues with his comments

BEKAERT INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 571/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.571/Pun/2015 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Bekaert Industries Private Vs. Dcit, Circle-1(1), Limited, Pune Plot No.127, Sr.No.232/1+2, Friends Co-Operative Hsg. Soc., New Airport Road, Behind Idbi, Sakore Nagar, Vimannagar, Pune – 411 014 Pan : Aaacb8571E Appellant Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.541/Pun/2015 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Circle-1(1), Vs. Bekaert Industries Private Pune Limited, Plot No.B-1, Midc, Ranjangaon, Tal Shirur, Dist. Pune 419210 Pan : Aaacb8571E Appellant Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.976/Pun/2016 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Bekaert Industries Private Limited, Vs. Dcit, Circle-1(1), Plot No.127, Sr.No.232/1+2, Pune Friends Co-Operative Hsg. Soc., New Airport Road, Behind Idbi, Sakore Nagar, Vimannagar, Pune – 411 014 Pan : Aaacb8571E Appellant Respondent Shri T. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy

Section 143(3)

transfer pricing addition of Rs.7,39,20,120/- in the international transaction of Import of raw materials. The assessee is aggrieved by the addition to this extent. 4. We have heard the rival submissions and gone through the relevant material on record. The ld. AR has placed on record international transaction wise chart showing the issues with his comments

BEKAERT INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 976/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Dec 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.571/Pun/2015 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Bekaert Industries Private Vs. Dcit, Circle-1(1), Limited, Pune Plot No.127, Sr.No.232/1+2, Friends Co-Operative Hsg. Soc., New Airport Road, Behind Idbi, Sakore Nagar, Vimannagar, Pune – 411 014 Pan : Aaacb8571E Appellant Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.541/Pun/2015 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Circle-1(1), Vs. Bekaert Industries Private Pune Limited, Plot No.B-1, Midc, Ranjangaon, Tal Shirur, Dist. Pune 419210 Pan : Aaacb8571E Appellant Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.976/Pun/2016 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Bekaert Industries Private Limited, Vs. Dcit, Circle-1(1), Plot No.127, Sr.No.232/1+2, Pune Friends Co-Operative Hsg. Soc., New Airport Road, Behind Idbi, Sakore Nagar, Vimannagar, Pune – 411 014 Pan : Aaacb8571E Appellant Respondent Shri T. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy

Section 143(3)

transfer pricing addition of Rs.7,39,20,120/- in the international transaction of Import of raw materials. The assessee is aggrieved by the addition to this extent. 4. We have heard the rival submissions and gone through the relevant material on record. The ld. AR has placed on record international transaction wise chart showing the issues with his comments

SAS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (INDIA) PVT. LTD ,PUNE vs. ADDITIONAL / JOINT/ DEPUTY/ASISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INT TAX), DELHI ADDITIONAL / JOINT/ DEPUTY/ASISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INT TAX), DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Partly Allowed

ITA 255/PUN/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune01 Nov 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.255/Pun/2021 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2016-17 Sas Research & The Additional / Joint / Development(India) Private Vs Deputy / Assistant Limited, Commissioner Of Income Level 1, 2A & 3, Tower 5, Tax / Income-Tax Officer, Cybercity, Magarpatta City, National E-Assessment Hadapsar, Pune – 411013. Centre, Delhi. Pan: Aaecs 8099 L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Rajendra Agiwal– Ar Revenue By Shri Shivraj B Moray – Dr Date Of Hearing 03/08/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 01/11/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Additional/Joint/ Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi, Dated 06.04.2021For The A.Y. 2016-17 Emanating From The Order Of The Dispute Resolution Panel-3, Mumbai, Dated 24/03/2020. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “Based On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, Sas Research & Development (India) Private Limited (‘Appellant’) Respectfully Craves Leave To Prefer An Appeal Against The Order Passed By The National E- Assessment Center, Delhi Under Section 143(3) R.W.S 144C(13),144C(13),143(3A) & 143(3B) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) Dated 6 April 2021 Pursuant To The Directions Issued By Hon’Ble Dispute Resolution Panel - 3 (‘Hon’Ble Drp’), Mumbai, Under Section 144C(5) Of The Act Dated 19 February 2021, On The Following Sas Research & Development (India) Pvt. Ltd., [A]

Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)

transfer Pricing Study report that assessee does Software development as per the basic design provided by its AEs. It is also mentioned in the TPSR that assessee also undertakes the design and other services in the entire Software development life cycle. Assessee also undertakes software coding. 6.4 Whereas, the Maveric Systems Ltd is only providing Testing Services. It is mentioned

DANA INDIA PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1(2),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 473/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Feb 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.473/Pun/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14

Section 143(3)Section 92C

transfer pricing addition will have to be restricted only to the international transactions. The last item of Intangible asset is `Customer relationships’. The ld. AR could not precisely provide us the nature of this intangible asset or its manner of user. If it was utilized only for Trading segment, then depreciation

M/S. VISHAY COMPONENTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 12, PUNE

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 213/PUN/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune13 Sept 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agarwal (through virtual)For Respondent: Shri Kalika Singh (through virtual)
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144C(13)Section 253

depreciation as charged by the assessee and comparables on the same assets. ……………….. 5. Another issue raised by the assessee is against the making of transfer pricing