Search: section 68

8 results for “section 68”+ Section 801A(4)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai97 Delhi60 Ahmedabad60 Hyderabad59 Bangalore13 Jaipur10 Surat8 Pune8 Cuttack7 Chennai6 Kolkata6 Chandigarh6 Jodhpur4 Visakhapatnam3 Lucknow3 Amritsar2 Indore2 Rajkot2 Raipur1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 80I30 Section 10A19 Section 143(3)8 Deduction7 Section 143(2)5 Section 10A(7)5 Addition to Income5 Depreciation4 Section 115J2 Section 32

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SAMEER B.LADKAT,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 178/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Jun 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.177/Pun/2017 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-7, Pune. .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. Shri Gautam B. Ladkat, 36, Somwar Peth, Pune-411 011. Pan :Aafpl4838C ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sharad ShahFor Respondent: Shri Vishwas Mundhe

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80I

68,454/- is hereby deleted. Ground no. 1 raised by the appellant is accordingly allowed.” 6. The Ld. AR of the asssessee at the time of hearing vehemently argued that the issue is squarely covered by the CBDT Circular No.1/2016 dated 15.02.2016 and specially by the ratio laid down by the Hon‟ble Madras High Court in the case

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SAMEER B.LADKAT,, PUNE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SAMEER B.LADKAT,, PUNE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. GAUTAM B.LADKAT,, PUNE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, PUNE vs. SHRI SAMEER B. LADKAR,, PUNE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, PUNE vs. SHRI GAUTAM B. LADKAT,, PUNE

M/S GIRIRAJ ENTERPRISES,PUNE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE, PUNE

M/S. HONEYWELL AUTOMATION INDIA LIMITED,,PUNE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-7, PUNE

ENTRATA INDIA PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), PUNE, PUNE

DCIT CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE, SWARGATE vs. ENTRATA INDIA PVT. LTD, PUNE