BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ TP Methodclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi59Mumbai47Bangalore40Chennai21Hyderabad15Ahmedabad15Kolkata7Jaipur7Indore5Pune3Karnataka2Dehradun2Visakhapatnam2Chandigarh1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4Transfer Pricing3Addition to Income3

LIQUIDHUB ANALYTICS PVT. LTD. (NOW MERGED WITH CAPGEMINI TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA LTD),PUNE vs. NFAC, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1952/PUN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Mar 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Smt Nilu Jaggi, CIT
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)

method 5.5. characterizing the Appellant as KPO services provider whereas the services provided or availed by the Appellant to from its AEs are in the nature of ITES/ BPO services 5.6. not giving enough time to the Appellant to perform the fresh search based on the filters applied by The Lo TPO in its show-cause notice. 5.7. non-sharing

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, PUNE vs. NORD DRIVE SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal as well as cross objection are

ITA 825/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.825/Pun/2016 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Acit, Circle-2, Vs. Nord Drive Systems Pvt. Ltd., Pune 282/2, 283/2, Plot No.15, Village Mann, Mulshi, Pune – 411 057 Pan : Aaccn0708R Appellant Respondent C.O. No.12/Pun/2018 (Arising Out Of Ita No.825/Pun/2016) िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Nord Drive Systems Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-2, 282/2, 283/2, Plot No.15, Pune Village Mann, Taluka Mulshi, Adj. Hinjewadi Midc, Phase-Ii, Pune – 411 057 Pan : Aaccn0708R Cross Objector Appellant In The Appeal Assessee By Shri Sharad Shah & Shri Rohit Tapadia Revenue By Shri T. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy Date Of Hearing 27-11-2019 Date Of Pronouncement 28-11-2019 आदेश / Order

Section 143(3)

method distinctively provides for adopting the `gross margin’. From the foregoing discussion, it is manifest that depreciation has to be necessarily considered as a part of the Operating costs in the process of determining the operating profit under the TNMM. It is, therefore, held that the statutory mandate for the numerator in the formula as per rule

LEAR AUTOMOTIVE INDIA P. LTD. ,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-8, PUNE, PUNE

ITA 554/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Oct 2025AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Dhanesh Bafna &For Respondent: Shri Prakash L. Pathade
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 92C

reassessed Rs.42,04,70,990/- by the Ld. AO vide draft assessment order passed u/s 143(3)/254 r.w.s. 144B r.w.s. 144C(1) dated 31.03.2023 which was challenged by the assessee by filing objections before the Ld. DRP. 2.3 Before the Ld. DRP, the assessee raised the following objections pertaining to allocation of RHQ charges : 1. “6.1. Issue