Search: reassessment

52 results for “reassessment”+ TDSclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14877 Section 14756 Section 12A38 Addition to Income38 Section 143(3)29 TDS29 Section 270A25 Section 10(20)24 Section 1124 Section 142(1)

SANTOSH SHANKAR GUJAR,NEAR VITTHAL RUKMINI MANDIR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 8(3), PUNE, AKURDI, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1654/PUN/2024[2014 - 2015]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Nov 2025

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1654 & 2038/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2013-14 Santosh Shankar Gujar, Vs. Ito, Ward-8(3), Pune. H/No.246, Shiv Parvati Bunglow, Laxmi Nagar, Thergaon- 411033. Pan : Alnpg9944K Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mrs. Vibha D. Gulabani Revenue By : Shri Umesh Phade Date Of Hearing : 02.09.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 19.11.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: Both The Above Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Dated 05.06.2024 & 29.07.2024 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2013-14 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In Both The Above Captioned Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. First We Shall Take Up The Appeal Of The Assessee In Ita No.1654/Pun/2024 For A.Y. 2014-15 For Adjudication.

For Appellant: Mrs. Vibha D. GulabaniFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Phade

Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 147

Showing 1–20 of 52 · Page 1 of 3

SANTOSH SHANKAR GUJAR,NEAR VITTHAL RUKMINI MANDIR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 8(3), PUNE, AKURDI, PUNE

SANTOSH SHANKAR GUJAR,NEAR VITTHAL RUKMINI MANDIR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 8(3), PUNE, AKURDI, PUNE

SANTOSH SHANKAR GUJAR,LAXMI NAGAR, THERGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 8(3), PUNE, AKURDI, PUNE

SHRI SAI ANIRUDDHA EDUCATION SOCIETY,RATNAGIRI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KOLHAPUR

SHRAMIK SERVA SEVA TRUST,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO (E) WARD-1(1) , NASHIK

SUNANDA CONSTRUCTIONS,PUNE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), PUNE, PUNE

SUNAND CONSTRUCTIONS,PUNE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), PUNE, PUNE

SATISH VISHNU THOMBARE, INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AHMEDNAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR vs. VARSHA PRAFULLA ZENDE, AHMEDNAGAR

VATSALABAI KARBHARI DEORE,KALWAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(5), NASHIK

INCOME TAX OFFICER, PUNE vs. SAGAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PUNE

TEJAS SHIVAJI ADSUL,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRADHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRAHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON

PADMAKAR VISHWAS DATE,,BHOSARI vs. INCOME TAX E ASSESSMENT, PUNE

PADMAKAR VISHWAS DATE,BHOSARI vs. INCOME TAX E ASSESSMENT, PUNE

PADMAKAR VISHWAS DATE,BHOSARI vs. INCOME TAX E ASSESSMENT , PUNE

AUTOCOMP CORPORATION PANSE PRIVATE LIMITED ,PUNE vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE

AUTOCOMP CORPORATION PANSE PRIVATE LIMITED ,PUNE vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE

BHASKAR DANVE PATIL ,JALNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, JALNA, JALNA

PARVATI STEEL RE ROLLING MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CC-2, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

SHAMKANT KESHAV KOTKAR (PROP. NANDAN BUILDERS),PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE