Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi60 Mumbai34 Indore23 Jaipur21 Nagpur17 Chennai13 Hyderabad9 Ahmedabad7 Pune7 Raipur4 Bangalore4 Lucknow4 Agra3 Allahabad3 Amritsar2 Jodhpur1 Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 270A22 Section 270A(8)8 Section 260A8 Penalty7 Section 95 Addition to Income5 Section 2504 Section 254(1)4 Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 143(1)(a)

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 NANDED, NANDED vs. SATYAWAN ARJUNRAO SHINDE, OSMANABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2109/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2109/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Ito, Ward-1, Nanded. Vs. Satyawan Arjunrao Shinde, Nagar Accident Hospital, Gore Complex, Samta Nagar, Osmanabad- 413501. Pan : Baeps8869J Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Shri Arvind Desai Assessee By : Shri B. P. Jaju Date Of Hearing : 02.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 21.02.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 06.08.2024 Passed By Ld. Cit(A), Pune-12 [‘Ld. Cit(A)’] For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Failed To Appreciate The Facts That The Assessee Has Suppressed Professional Receipts Not Shown In His Itr, Ld. Cit(A)-12, Pune Vide Letter Dtd.02/01/2023 Directed That Penalty Proceedings U/S 270A Of The Act May Be Initiated By The Ao At The Time Of Giving Effect To The Appeal Order Dtd.28/11/2022. Accordingly Ao Initiated Penalty Proceedings As Per Clause (E) Of Sub-Section 9 Of Section 270A Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri B. P. JajuFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai

Section 133ASection 2Section 270ASection 270A(1)

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 NANDED, NANDED vs. SATYAWAN ARJUNRAO SHINDE, OSMANABAD

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 NANDED, NANDED vs. SATYAWAN ARJUNRAO SHINDE, OSMANABAD

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRADHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRAHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON

ANNASAHEB NAMDEO GUNJAL,NASHIK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NASHIK

DEEPAK BHIKA SURYAWANSHI,NASHIK vs. ITO WARD 2(1), NASHIK

DEEPAK BHIKA SURYAWANSHI,NASHIK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NASHIK

KASAT PRAKASH M HUF,LATUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, NANDED, NANDED