SURJITSINGH SEVAKSINGH BAGGA,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 6(1),, PUNE
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 2566/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Oct 2019AY 2013-14
Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am
For Appellant: Shri Bharat ShahFor Respondent: Shri Prashant Gadekar
Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)
153/- on account of capital gains. On the
aforesaid additions, AO vide order dt.30.09.2016 levied penalty of
Rs.14,58,282/- u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Aggrieved by the penalty
order of AO, assessee carried the matter before Ld.CIT(A), who vide
order dt.30.06.2016 (in appeal No.PN/CIT(A)-4/DCIT, Circle-6,
Pune/595/2016-17) dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Aggrieved
