INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(3), , PUNE vs. M/S RAVIRAJ VENTURES, PUNE
In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed
ITA 667/PUN/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 May 2023AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteincome Tax Officer, Vs M/S.Raviraj Ventures, Ward-6(3), Pune. 1 To 5, Millenium Star, Dhole Patil Road, Pune – 411001. Pan: Aagfr 3176 G Appellant/Revenue Respondent/Assessee Assessee By : Shri Rajiv Thakkar, Ar Revenue By : Shri M.G.Jasnani, Jt.Cit Date Of Hearing : 16/02/2023 Date Of Pronouncement. : 15/05/2023 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals), Pune-11, Dated 30.06.2022 Emanating From The Order Of The Acit, Dated 30.11.2018 Under Section 271(1)(C)Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y.2016-17. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Cit(A) Erred Both On Facts & In Law In Passing The Order. 2. The Cit (A) Erred In Law As Well As On Facts By Deleting The Penalty U/S 271(L)(C) Of The I.T. Act, 1961 Of Rs.1,59,55,025/- Levied By The Ao Towards Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars Of Income For Not Following Recognization Of Revenue As Per As-9, As Raviraj Ventures [R]
For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Thakkar, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.G.Jasnani, Jt.CIT
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)
Housing v. CIT[2013] 38 taxmann.com 203 (Mad)
(iv) Pr.CIT v.
Rajkumar
Gulab
Badgujar
[2019]
111
taxmann.com 257 (SC)
(v)
Paras Buildtech India (P) Ltd. v. CIT [2017] 80
taxmann.com 335 (Del)
(vi) Pr.CIT v. Taneja Developers & Infrastructure Ltd. [2021]
435 ITR 122 (Del)
(vii) Trident Estate (P) Ltd. v. ITO[2021] 127 taxmann.com
360 (Mum. – Trib.)
(viii) Krish Infrastructure
