BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

19 results for “disallowance”+ Section 801A(4)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai149Delhi94Hyderabad84Ahmedabad76Kolkata32Bangalore28Chennai28Pune19Indore18Jaipur15Visakhapatnam12Surat10Patna10Cuttack7Nagpur6Chandigarh6Dehradun5Jodhpur5Raipur5Rajkot5Cochin4Lucknow3Amritsar2Guwahati1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 80I43Section 3526Section 10A22Deduction15Section 14A13Section 143(2)12Section 143(3)12Disallowance12Addition to Income12Section 143(1)

T AND T INFRA LIMITED,PUNE vs. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-7, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 291/PUN/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune01 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2016-17 T & T Infra Limited Acit, Circle – 7, Pune A-1, Vishnu Vihar, Bibwewadi Vs. Kondhwa Road, Market Yard, Pune – 411037 Pan: Aaect3902H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Tarun Ghia Department By : S/Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari & Sourabh Nayak Date Of Hearing : 10-07-2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 01-10-2024 O R D E R Per Astha Chandra, Jm :

For Appellant: Shri Tarun GhiaFor Respondent: S/Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari and Sourabh Nayak
Section 143(2)Section 80I

801A(4)(b)(i) of the Act. 4. The learned CIT(A) while confirming the disallowance of deduction u/s 80IA(4) made by the AO has erred in holding that appellant company failed to prove that it had fulfilled the conditions as laid down in section 80IA(4) of the Act without giving any valid and logical reason as well

10
Section 80G7
Depreciation5

M/S GIRIRAJ ENTERPRISES,PUNE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 427/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S PathakFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 10(35)Section 132Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 153A

iv) of the Act, it is pertinent to note here that, there is no mandate u/s 80IA to treat each 21 IT(SS)A Nos.23 to 25/PUN/2024 windmill project as 'separate undertaking' of the assessee. Section 80IA envisages only two classification of the business of the assessee viz. eligible business' (as per explicit wording of section 80IA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. GAUTAM B.LADKAT,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 177/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Jun 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.177/Pun/2017 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-7, Pune. .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. Shri Gautam B. Ladkat, 36, Somwar Peth, Pune-411 011. Pan :Aafpl4838C ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sharad ShahFor Respondent: Shri Vishwas Mundhe
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80I

disallowance of deduction u/s. 8oIA(4) of the Act of Rs.1,24,68,454/- is hereby deleted. Ground no. 1 raised by the appellant is accordingly allowed.” 6. The Ld. AR of the asssessee at the time of hearing vehemently argued that the issue is squarely covered by the CBDT Circular No.1/2016 dated 15.02.2016 and specially by the ratio laid

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SAMEER B.LADKAT,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 178/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Jun 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.177/Pun/2017 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-7, Pune. .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. Shri Gautam B. Ladkat, 36, Somwar Peth, Pune-411 011. Pan :Aafpl4838C ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sharad ShahFor Respondent: Shri Vishwas Mundhe
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80I

disallowance of deduction u/s. 8oIA(4) of the Act of Rs.1,24,68,454/- is hereby deleted. Ground no. 1 raised by the appellant is accordingly allowed.” 6. The Ld. AR of the asssessee at the time of hearing vehemently argued that the issue is squarely covered by the CBDT Circular No.1/2016 dated 15.02.2016 and specially by the ratio laid

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, PUNE vs. SHRI SAMEER B. LADKAR,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1358/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune01 Aug 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1358/Pun/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Sharad ShahFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Garg
Section 143(3)Section 80ISection 80l

disallowance of deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Act of Rs. 1,24,68,454/- is hereby deleted. Ground No.1 raised by the Appellant is accordingly allowed. " As the facts are pari materia with the earlier year, following judicial discipline, the AO is directed to allow the deduction claimed by the Appellant u/s 80IA(4). The Appellant succeeds in this

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, PUNE vs. SHRI GAUTAM B. LADKAT,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1360/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune01 Aug 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1358/Pun/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Sharad ShahFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Garg
Section 143(3)Section 80ISection 80l

disallowance of deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Act of Rs. 1,24,68,454/- is hereby deleted. Ground No.1 raised by the Appellant is accordingly allowed. " As the facts are pari materia with the earlier year, following judicial discipline, the AO is directed to allow the deduction claimed by the Appellant u/s 80IA(4). The Appellant succeeds in this

ASST. CIT, CIRCLE-6, PUNE vs. SAKAL PAPERS LIMITED,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 926/PUN/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Dec 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Ashok KotharyFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das
Section 80I

disallowance of claim of Rs.44,95,264/- under section 80IA of the Act. 12. At the time of hearing, Ld. AR of the Assessee appraised the Bench that the issue is squarely covered by the assessee’s own case in ITA No.937/PUN/2008 for the assessment year 2005-06. A.Y.2006-07 13. On the other hand, Ld. D.R very fairly conceded

VIJAY DEVICHAND NIBJIYA,PUNE vs. DCIT CIRCLE (5), PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is Partly Allowed

ITA 634/PUN/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Ms.Astha Chandra & Dr.Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.634/Pun/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2022-23 Vijay Devichand Nibjiya, V The Dcit, Office No.304/305/306, S. Circle-(5)/A.O. D Wing, 3Rd Floor, Business Centralised Processing Court, Mukundnagar, Pune – Centre. 411037. Maharashtra. Pan: Aanpn8491R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Nikhil S Pathak – Ar Revenue By Shri Akhilesh Srivastva – Dr Date Of Hearing 19/06/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/07/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Add./Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal)-6, Delhi Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, For The A.Y.2022-23 Dated 13.02.2025. The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 801ASection 801A(4)(iv)Section 801A(7)Section 80I

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the A.Y.2022-23 dated 13.02.2025. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal : ITA No.634/PUN/2025 [A] “11 The learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance of deduction of Rs.1,55,63,901/- u/s 801A(4)(iv

KUMAR URBAN DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD (SUCCESSOR KUMAR HOUSING CORPORATION PVT LTD),PUNE vs. DCIT CIRCLE 14, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and the

ITA 2874/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Aug 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 143(2)Section 32Section 36(1)(iii)

iv) City Corporation Ltd. 171 taxmann.com 301 (Bom) v) Capgemini Technology Services India Ltd. 173 taxmann.com 616 (Pune.) 13. So far as the merit of the case is concerned, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the Assessing Officer in the impugned assessment year has made an addition of Rs.26

M/S. HONEYWELL AUTOMATION INDIA LIMITED,,PUNE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-7, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 359/PUN/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune02 Nov 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 359/Pun/2013 िनधा#रण वष# / Assessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Kamal Sawhney & Ms. Rhea AmarFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 10A(7)Section 801ASection 80I

801A were invoked and the deduction was restricted to the aggregate margins earned by the comparable entities.' 6. The above contentions of the AO were confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) during the proceedings for AY 2007-08 wherein it was held that the key factors required for the AO to invoke its powers u/s.10A r.w s. 80IA are 'close

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLHAPUR vs. MAHALAXMI INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD., KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 979/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Jan 2025AY 2018-19
For Appellant: \nShri Nikhil S. PathakFor Respondent: \nShri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 801ASection 80I

iv) disallowance on account of depreciation on luxury\ncars of Rs.32,42,484/-.\n3. In appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) gave full relief to the assessee in respect of\nthe above additions/disallowances made by the Ld. AO on account of\ndeduction claimed u/s 80IA(4), disallowance u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D and\ndepreciation on luxury car. Aggrieved with such order

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -1 , PUNE vs. M/S PERSISTENT SYSTEMS LIMITED , PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 499/PUN/2020[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jun 2021AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 497, 498 & 499/Pun/2020 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-4, Pune. .......अपीलाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: Shri R.D. OnkarFor Respondent: Shri Mahadevan A M Krishnan &
Section 10ASection 14ASection 35

section 14A of the Act lays down the mechanism for determining such amount of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income in accordance with method as prescribed under Rule 8D of I T. Rules, 1962. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in deleting the disallowance u/s.10AA(9) r.w.s. 801A

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -1, PUNE vs. M/S PERSISTENT SYSTEMS LIMITED, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 498/PUN/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jun 2021AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 497, 498 & 499/Pun/2020 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-4, Pune. .......अपीलाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: Shri R.D. OnkarFor Respondent: Shri Mahadevan A M Krishnan &
Section 10ASection 14ASection 35

section 14A of the Act lays down the mechanism for determining such amount of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income in accordance with method as prescribed under Rule 8D of I T. Rules, 1962. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in deleting the disallowance u/s.10AA(9) r.w.s. 801A

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -4 , PUNE vs. M/S PERSISTENT SYSTEMS LIMITED, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 497/PUN/2020[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jun 2021AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 497, 498 & 499/Pun/2020 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-4, Pune. .......अपीलाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: Shri R.D. OnkarFor Respondent: Shri Mahadevan A M Krishnan &
Section 10ASection 14ASection 35

section 14A of the Act lays down the mechanism for determining such amount of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income in accordance with method as prescribed under Rule 8D of I T. Rules, 1962. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in deleting the disallowance u/s.10AA(9) r.w.s. 801A

ENTRATA INDIA PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 133/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune24 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.133/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Entrata India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Dcit, Circle-1(1), Pune. International Tech Park, Block-1, Wing-A, 14Th Floor, Kharadi, Pune- 411014. Pan : Aaacw7089A Appellant Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.66/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dcit, Circle-1(1), Pune. Vs. Entrata India Pvt. Ltd., International Tech Park, Block-1, Wing-A, 14Th Floor, Kharadi, Pune- 411014. Pan : Aaacw7089A Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing 14.11.2024 : Date Of Pronouncement : 24.12.2024 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee As Well As By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Order Dated 24.11.2023 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)-13, Pune [‘Cit(A)’] For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. First, We Shall Take Up The Appeal Of The Assessee In Ita No.133/Pun/2024 For Adjudication.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 32

iv. Oh the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) was not justified in imposing burden of proving tax avoidance ignoring the fact that section 801A(10) of the Act is a “domestic transfer pricing” provision and proving tax avoidance is not one of the pre-condition for invoking transfer pricing provisions

DCIT CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE, SWARGATE vs. ENTRATA INDIA PVT. LTD, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 66/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune24 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.133/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Entrata India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Dcit, Circle-1(1), Pune. International Tech Park, Block-1, Wing-A, 14Th Floor, Kharadi, Pune- 411014. Pan : Aaacw7089A Appellant Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.66/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dcit, Circle-1(1), Pune. Vs. Entrata India Pvt. Ltd., International Tech Park, Block-1, Wing-A, 14Th Floor, Kharadi, Pune- 411014. Pan : Aaacw7089A Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing 14.11.2024 : Date Of Pronouncement : 24.12.2024 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee As Well As By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Order Dated 24.11.2023 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)-13, Pune [‘Cit(A)’] For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. First, We Shall Take Up The Appeal Of The Assessee In Ita No.133/Pun/2024 For Adjudication.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 32

iv. Oh the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) was not justified in imposing burden of proving tax avoidance ignoring the fact that section 801A(10) of the Act is a “domestic transfer pricing” provision and proving tax avoidance is not one of the pre-condition for invoking transfer pricing provisions

ADVIK HI TECH PVT LTD,PUNE vs. DY.COMM.OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 8, PUNE, AKURDI PUNE

In the result, the cross appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 1158/PUN/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1158/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Advik Hi Tech Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Dcit, Circle-8, Pune. Gat No.357, Plot No.99, Village- Kharabwadi, Tal.- Khed, Chakan- 410501. Pan : Aacca3106E Appellant Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1330/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Dcit, Circle-8, Pune. Vs. Advik Hi Tech Pvt. Ltd., Gat No.357, Plot No.99, Village- Kharabwadi, Tal.- Khed, Chakan- 410501. Pan : Aacca3106E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Sharad A. Shah & Shri Rohit S. Tapadiya Revenue By : Shri Amol Khairnar Date Of Hearing : 21.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 18.02.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: These Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee As Well As By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Order Dated 16.10.2023 Passed By Ld.Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment Year 2020-21 Respectively.

For Appellant: Shri Sharad A. Shah &For Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(1)Section 80GSection 80I

iv) otherwise acquires or disposes of assets, or incurs or settles liabilities, denominated in a foreign currency. (h) "Forward exchange contract" means an agreement to exchange different currencies at a forward rate, and includes a foreign currency option contract or another financial instrument of a similar nature; (i) "Forward rate" is the specified exchange rate for exchange of two Currencies

DCIT CIRCLE-1, NASHIK vs. JYOTI PAPER UDYOG LIMITED, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 552/PUN/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Oct 2025AY 2013-14
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40(2)(a)Section 92Section 92BSection 92B(1)

801A, 801B etc. Thus, it is observed that the payments made by the appellant to the four related parties u/s 40A(2), exceeding Rs.5 crore fell within the scope of Specified Domestic Transactions (SDT\") as defined under clause (i) of section 92BA as existing on the Statute Books during/for the relevant period. The transactions entered with the related parties

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-8, PUNE, PUNE vs. ADVIK HI-TECH PVT. LTD., PUNE

In the result, the cross appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA\nNo

ITA 1330/PUN/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Feb 2025AY 2020-21
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 35Section 35(1)Section 80GSection 80I

iv) otherwise acquires or disposes of assets, or incurs or\nsettles liabilities, denominated in a foreign currency.\n(h) \"Forward exchange contract\" means an agreement to\nexchange different currencies at a forward rate, and includes\na foreign currency option contract or another financial\ninstrument of a similar nature;\n(i) \"Forward rate\" is the specified exchange rate for exchange