Search: disallowance

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 35Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi85 Mumbai60 Bangalore27 Chennai14 Hyderabad9 Kolkata6 SC4 Pune3 Ahmedabad3 Chandigarh2 Guwahati2 Panaji2 Dehradun2 Telangana1 Cochin1 Jaipur1 Karnataka1 MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1 Surat1

Key Topics

Section 270A8 Section 143(2)3 Section 143(1)(a)2 Section 270A(6)(a)2 Section 1312 Section 270A(9)2 Section 270A(3)(i)2 Section 1432 Penalty2 TDS

JAYA HIND INDUSTRIES LIMITED,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 9,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 2149/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Jan 2021AY 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Mukesh PatelFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 31

disallowed the claim treated the same as capital expenditure. 3. Being aggrieved by the above addition, an appeal was preferred before the ld. CIT(A), who vide his impugned order confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer by holding that it is a case of substitution of old asset by new asset and the expenditure did not fall within

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRAHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are

JAYA HIND INDUSTRIES LIMITED,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 9,, PUNE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRAHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON

JAYA HIND INDUSTRIES LIMITED,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 9,, PUNE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRAHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK vs. CHAKRADHAR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALGAON