BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

326 results for “depreciation”+ Section 143(3)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,985Delhi2,450Bangalore960Chennai715Kolkata657Ahmedabad636Jaipur351Pune326Hyderabad316Chandigarh196Indore169Surat151Cochin128Raipur127Visakhapatnam126Amritsar110Karnataka99Rajkot76Cuttack75Lucknow66Nagpur51Guwahati35Jodhpur35SC26Telangana24Panaji22Ranchi21Agra16Dehradun15Patna15Allahabad12Kerala12Calcutta12Varanasi8Jabalpur4Punjab & Haryana3Orissa2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Rajasthan1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)92Addition to Income67Section 143(1)51Disallowance48Section 3543Section 14A40Section 80J38Section 26338Section 143(2)36Section 148

ACIT,CIR.-1,, AURANGABAD vs. SKODA AUTO INDIA PVT. LTD.,, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 714/PUN/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune02 Jul 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.714/Pun/2011 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2005-06 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Aurangabad. .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. Plot No.A1/1, Shendra Five Star Industrial Area, Midc, Aurangabad-431 201 Pan :Aaecs3749M ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil Pathak &For Respondent: Shri Avadhesh Kumar, CIT

Depreciation cannot be computed as per American rules applicable to the parent company. Therefore, Mr. Ostwal was correct in adjusting margin of profit of the taxpayer.” Thus, the Hon‟ble ITAT, Pune has also allowed adjustments made by the appellant to its profitability to account for difference and ensure comparability of the entities being compared. 10.6 The appellant has contended

SKODA AUTO INDIA PVT. LTD.,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Showing 1–20 of 326 · Page 1 of 17

...
30
Deduction29
Depreciation29
ITA 546/PUN/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune02 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.714/Pun/2011 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2005-06 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Aurangabad. .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. Plot No.A1/1, Shendra Five Star Industrial Area, Midc, Aurangabad-431 201 Pan :Aaecs3749M ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil Pathak &For Respondent: Shri Avadhesh Kumar, CIT

Depreciation cannot be computed as per American rules applicable to the parent company. Therefore, Mr. Ostwal was correct in adjusting margin of profit of the taxpayer.” Thus, the Hon‟ble ITAT, Pune has also allowed adjustments made by the appellant to its profitability to account for difference and ensure comparability of the entities being compared. 10.6 The appellant has contended

ITO, WARD-1(1), SOLAPUR, SOLAPUR vs. MS. KSHIRSAGAR FABRICS, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 97/PUN/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Sept 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2009-10

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 40A(3)

143(3) of the IT Act. In reply to the Director of Audit, the AO had opposed the reopening. In spite of the same, he has reopened the assessment. It is, therefore, difficult to say that he has formed his own opinion that the income has escaped assessment. 12. Secondly, it is not at all a case that the petitioner

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 596/PUN/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

ii) M/s. B U Bhandari Schemes, (iii) M/s. B U Bhandari Enterprises and (iv) M/s. B U Bhandari Real Estate and the office premises of assessee was covered. During the course of search operations, cash of ₹ 3,05,080/- was found and seized. The assessee had originally filed return of income on 19.08.2009 declaring income of ₹ 43,73,420/-. Thereafter

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 597/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

ii) M/s. B U Bhandari Schemes, (iii) M/s. B U Bhandari Enterprises and (iv) M/s. B U Bhandari Real Estate and the office premises of assessee was covered. During the course of search operations, cash of ₹ 3,05,080/- was found and seized. The assessee had originally filed return of income on 19.08.2009 declaring income of ₹ 43,73,420/-. Thereafter

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME-TAX ,,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 598/PUN/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

ii) M/s. B U Bhandari Schemes, (iii) M/s. B U Bhandari Enterprises and (iv) M/s. B U Bhandari Real Estate and the office premises of assessee was covered. During the course of search operations, cash of ₹ 3,05,080/- was found and seized. The assessee had originally filed return of income on 19.08.2009 declaring income of ₹ 43,73,420/-. Thereafter

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 599/PUN/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

ii) M/s. B U Bhandari Schemes, (iii) M/s. B U Bhandari Enterprises and (iv) M/s. B U Bhandari Real Estate and the office premises of assessee was covered. During the course of search operations, cash of ₹ 3,05,080/- was found and seized. The assessee had originally filed return of income on 19.08.2009 declaring income of ₹ 43,73,420/-. Thereafter

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

ITA 931/PUN/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jun 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Kishore PhadkeFor Respondent: Ms Nandita Kanchan, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 12.12.2008 at total income of ₹ 7,42,84,300/-. In the first appeal, the CIT(A) deleted addition made on account of disallowance of assessee’s claim of depreciation of ₹ 1,68,80,373/-, vide order dated 31.03.2010. The Commissioner of Income- tax-V, Pune vide order under section

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

ITA 929/PUN/2014[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jun 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Kishore PhadkeFor Respondent: Ms Nandita Kanchan, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 12.12.2008 at total income of ₹ 7,42,84,300/-. In the first appeal, the CIT(A) deleted addition made on account of disallowance of assessee’s claim of depreciation of ₹ 1,68,80,373/-, vide order dated 31.03.2010. The Commissioner of Income- tax-V, Pune vide order under section

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

ITA 932/PUN/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jun 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Kishore PhadkeFor Respondent: Ms Nandita Kanchan, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 12.12.2008 at total income of ₹ 7,42,84,300/-. In the first appeal, the CIT(A) deleted addition made on account of disallowance of assessee’s claim of depreciation of ₹ 1,68,80,373/-, vide order dated 31.03.2010. The Commissioner of Income- tax-V, Pune vide order under section

INCOME-TAX OFFICER vs. PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

ITA 945/PUN/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jun 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Kishore PhadkeFor Respondent: Ms Nandita Kanchan, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 12.12.2008 at total income of ₹ 7,42,84,300/-. In the first appeal, the CIT(A) deleted addition made on account of disallowance of assessee’s claim of depreciation of ₹ 1,68,80,373/-, vide order dated 31.03.2010. The Commissioner of Income- tax-V, Pune vide order under section

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

ITA 930/PUN/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jun 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Kishore PhadkeFor Respondent: Ms Nandita Kanchan, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 12.12.2008 at total income of ₹ 7,42,84,300/-. In the first appeal, the CIT(A) deleted addition made on account of disallowance of assessee’s claim of depreciation of ₹ 1,68,80,373/-, vide order dated 31.03.2010. The Commissioner of Income- tax-V, Pune vide order under section

INCOME-TAX OFFICER vs. PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

ITA 944/PUN/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jun 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Kishore PhadkeFor Respondent: Ms Nandita Kanchan, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 12.12.2008 at total income of ₹ 7,42,84,300/-. In the first appeal, the CIT(A) deleted addition made on account of disallowance of assessee’s claim of depreciation of ₹ 1,68,80,373/-, vide order dated 31.03.2010. The Commissioner of Income- tax-V, Pune vide order under section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 60/PUN/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

depreciation on ‘Licence to collect toll’ considering it as an intangible asset in terms of section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the department has not accepted the decision of the ITAT, Pune and an appeal has been filed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 62/PUN/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

depreciation on ‘Licence to collect toll’ considering it as an intangible asset in terms of section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the department has not accepted the decision of the ITAT, Pune and an appeal has been filed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 63/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

depreciation on ‘Licence to collect toll’ considering it as an intangible asset in terms of section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the department has not accepted the decision of the ITAT, Pune and an appeal has been filed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 61/PUN/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

depreciation on ‘Licence to collect toll’ considering it as an intangible asset in terms of section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the department has not accepted the decision of the ITAT, Pune and an appeal has been filed

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI ENETERPRISES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 642/PUN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

ii) M/s. B U Bhandari Schemes, (iii) M/s. B U Bhandari Enterprises and (iv) M/s. B U Bhandari Real Estate and the office premises of assessee was covered. During the course of search operations, cash of ₹ 3,05,080/- was found and seized. The assessee had originally filed return of income on 19.08.2009 declaring income of ₹ 43,73,420/-. Thereafter

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI SCHEMES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 641/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

ii) M/s. B U Bhandari Schemes, (iii) M/s. B U Bhandari Enterprises and (iv) M/s. B U Bhandari Real Estate and the office premises of assessee was covered. During the course of search operations, cash of ₹ 3,05,080/- was found and seized. The assessee had originally filed return of income on 19.08.2009 declaring income of ₹ 43,73,420/-. Thereafter

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI SCHEMES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 640/PUN/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

ii) M/s. B U Bhandari Schemes, (iii) M/s. B U Bhandari Enterprises and (iv) M/s. B U Bhandari Real Estate and the office premises of assessee was covered. During the course of search operations, cash of ₹ 3,05,080/- was found and seized. The assessee had originally filed return of income on 19.08.2009 declaring income of ₹ 43,73,420/-. Thereafter