INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

1. The Board have considered whether the requirement under section 12A(b) of filing audit report 'along with the return of income' is mandatory so as to disentitle the trust from claiming exemption under sections 11 and 12 in case of omission to furnish such report in the prescribed form along with the return. 2. Normally, it should be possible

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

1. The Board have considered whether the requirement under section 12A(b) of filing audit report 'along with the return of income' is mandatory so as to disentitle the trust from claiming exemption under sections 11 and 12 in case of omission to furnish such report in the prescribed form along with the return. 2. Normally, it should be possible

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

1. The Board have considered whether the requirement under section 12A(b) of filing audit report 'along with the return of income' is mandatory so as to disentitle the trust from claiming exemption under sections 11 and 12 in case of omission to furnish such report in the prescribed form along with the return. 2. Normally, it should be possible

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing the exemption u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act as - a) The assessee has not claimed any such exemption in any of his return of income. b) The assessee has failed to get its accounts audited as required u/s 12A(b

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing the exemption u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act as - a) The assessee has not claimed any such exemption in any of his return of income. b) The assessee has failed to get its accounts audited as required u/s 12A(b

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing the exemption u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act as - a) The assessee has not claimed any such exemption in any of his return of income. b) The assessee has failed to get its accounts audited as required u/s 12A(b

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing the exemption u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act as - a) The assessee has not claimed any such exemption in any of his return of income. b) The assessee has failed to get its accounts audited as required u/s 12A(b

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing the exemption u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act as - a) The assessee has not claimed any such exemption in any of his return of income. b) The assessee has failed to get its accounts audited as required u/s 12A(b

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing the exemption u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act as - a) The assessee has not claimed any such exemption in any of his return of income. b) The assessee has failed to get its accounts audited as required u/s 12A(b

STARS FORUM,PUNE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI R. K. PANDA (Vice President), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)

condone the delay of 129 days and proceed to adjudicate the appeal. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 w.e.f. 23.12.2014 and is actively engaged in range of charitable activities centred around skilled training for advancement and rural societies reform. The assessee trust

STARS FORUM,PUNE vs. CIT EXEMPTION , PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI R. K. PANDA (Vice President), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)

condone the delay of 129 days and proceed to adjudicate the appeal. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 w.e.f. 23.12.2014 and is actively engaged in range of charitable activities centred around skilled training for advancement and rural societies reform. The assessee trust

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad

condonation of delay in filing the return and Audit Report on Form 10B, assessee has to approach the competent authority along with justification for the delay”. 4. Now the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. 5. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that Audit Report on Form No.10B was filed on 16.02.2022 and at the time of processing

DISTRICT PROBATION & AFTER CARE ASSOCIATION SATARA,SATARA vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD1(1), PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

condonation of delay in filing of Form 10B was also furnished on 21.09.2023 and the main reason for delay was on account of covid-19 pandemic outbreak restrictions. However, even after the uploading of Audit Report in Form 10B on 30.03.2021, in the return processed u/s.143(1)(a) of the Act on 30.11.2021 the benefit of application of income

SOLO RESEARCH FOUNDATION,PUNE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Assessee in ITA No

Bench: Ms.Astha Chandra & Dr.Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.216 & 217/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year:- Solo Research Foundation, V The Commissioner Of Office No.50/51, B12 S Income Tax(Exemption), Shardaram Park, Sasoon Road, Pune. Pune – 411001. Pan: Aaxcs3760K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Rahul Kaul – Ar Revenue By Shri Amit Bobde – Dr Date Of Hearing 25/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/09/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption), Pune Rejecting The Application For Grant Of Registration U/S.12Ar.W.S 12Ab & 80G(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(Hereinafter Referred To As „The Act‟) Both Dated 28.11.2024 Respectively. For The Sake Of Convenience, These Two Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being

condone such delay and such application shall be deemed to have been filed within time;] 5. Since the Assessee was already having registration u/s.12AA of the Act, as per Amended Section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act, the Assessee was required to apply for registration within the three months from 1st April, 2021. The time limit of three months from

SOLO RESEARCH FOUNDATION,PUNE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Assessee in ITA No

Bench: Ms.Astha Chandra & Dr.Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.216 & 217/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year:- Solo Research Foundation, V The Commissioner Of Office No.50/51, B12 S Income Tax(Exemption), Shardaram Park, Sasoon Road, Pune. Pune – 411001. Pan: Aaxcs3760K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Rahul Kaul – Ar Revenue By Shri Amit Bobde – Dr Date Of Hearing 25/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/09/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption), Pune Rejecting The Application For Grant Of Registration U/S.12Ar.W.S 12Ab & 80G(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(Hereinafter Referred To As „The Act‟) Both Dated 28.11.2024 Respectively. For The Sake Of Convenience, These Two Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being

condone such delay and such application shall be deemed to have been filed within time;] 5. Since the Assessee was already having registration u/s.12AA of the Act, as per Amended Section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act, the Assessee was required to apply for registration within the three months from 1st April, 2021. The time limit of three months from

SHRI GANADHIPATI GANDHARACHARYA KUNTIUSAGAR VIDYA SODH SONSTHA,KOLHAPUR vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, PUNE, KOLHAPUR

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Astha Chandra

section 12A(1)(B) of the Act. 5. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. Addl./JCIT(A) challenging intimation order u/s 143(1) of the Act with a delay which was condoned

SHRI GANADHIPATI GANDHARACHARYA KUNTIUSAGAR VIDYA SODH SONSTHA,PUNE vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Astha Chandra

section 12A(1)(B) of the Act. 5. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. Addl./JCIT(A) challenging intimation order u/s 143(1) of the Act with a delay which was condoned

SHRI GANADHIPATI GANDHARACHARYA KUNTIUSAGAR VIDYA SODH SONSTHA,KOLHAPUR vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, PUNE, KOLHAPUR

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Astha Chandra

section 12A(1)(B) of the Act. 5. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. Addl./JCIT(A) challenging intimation order u/s 143(1) of the Act with a delay which was condoned