AIDS SOCIETY OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE

short courses etc(Page 180 of the Paper Book No. II). As stated earlier, Appellant is an accredited institution of FOGSI in this regard.\nThe brief events involved thereafter w.r.t conference and sponsorships are as follows:\nDeciding the venue, topic of the conference and the speakers\nInviting expressions of interest from various pharma companies for\neducational grant/sponsorship\nApplication to Maharashtra

PUNE MATHADI HAMAL AND OTHER MANUAL WORKERS BOARD,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1012/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Pune Mathadihamal & Other The Income Tax Manual Workers Board, V Officer, Shramashakti Bhavan, S Ward-5(1), Pune. Coomercial Plot No.1, Market Yard, Pune – 411037. Pan: Aaalp0097L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Vipul Joshi – Ar Revenue By Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari & Shri Rajesh Gawali– Dr’S Date Of Hearing 17/04/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 27/06/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Orders Of Ld.Commissionerof Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Under Section 250 Of The Act Dated 14.07.2023 :

short term funds, major part of interest is paid back to workers and taxed in their hands as "Salary" and part of the interest is used to defray the administrative expenses of the board as small portion of levy is not sufficient to meet the administrative expenses of the board in the form of salary of clerks, rent, telephone, electricity

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1121 To 1126/Pun/2024 Assessment Years : 2012-13 To 2017-18

charitable purposes other than any anonymous donation made with a specific direction that such donation is for any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution run by such trust or institution. (3) For the purposes of this section, "anonymous donation" means any voluntary contribution referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24) of section

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1121 To 1126/Pun/2024 Assessment Years : 2012-13 To 2017-18

charitable purposes other than any anonymous donation made with a specific direction that such donation is for any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution run by such trust or institution. (3) For the purposes of this section, "anonymous donation" means any voluntary contribution referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24) of section

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1121 To 1126/Pun/2024 Assessment Years : 2012-13 To 2017-18

charitable purposes other than any anonymous donation made with a specific direction that such donation is for any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution run by such trust or institution. (3) For the purposes of this section, "anonymous donation" means any voluntary contribution referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24) of section

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION , KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are\npartly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

charitable purposes other than any anonymous donation\nmade with a specific direction that such donation is for any\nuniversity or other educational institution or any hospital or other\nmedical institution run by such trust or institution.\n(3) For the purposes of this section, \"anonymous donation\" means\nany voluntary contribution referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are\npartly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

charitable purposes other than any anonymous donation\nmade with a specific direction that such donation is for any\nuniversity or other educational institution or any hospital or other\nmedical institution run by such trust or institution.\n(3) For the purposes of this section, \"anonymous donation\" means\nany voluntary contribution referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are\npartly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

charitable purposes other than any anonymous donation\nmade with a specific direction that such donation is for any\nuniversity or other educational institution or any hospital or other\nmedical institution run by such trust or institution.\n(3) For the purposes of this section, \"anonymous donation\" means\nany voluntary contribution referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause

SINHAGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,PUNE vs. PCIT(CENTRAL), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoresinhagad Technical Education Society Pcit (Central), Pune Smt. Khilare Marg, Off Karve Road, Vs. Pune – 411004 Pan: Aabts9900Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Suhas Bora & Miss Sampada Ingale Department By : Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari - Cit Date Of Hearing : 25-03-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-05-2025 O R D E R

short referred as 'STES') had filed its returns of income for assessment years 2019-20 to 2024-25 representing itself as a registered trust and claiming the benefit of exemptions under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as „the Act'). A search & seizure operation was conducted under section

AGRA OBSTETRICAL AND GYNAECOLOGICAL SOCIETY,AGRA vs. PCIT, CENTRAL, PUNE

short courses etc(Page 180 of the Paper Book No. II). As\nstated earlier, Appellant is an accredited institution of FOGSI in this\nregard.\nThe brief events involved thereafter w.r.t conference and sponsorships\nare as follows:\nDeciding the venue, topic of the conference and the speakers\nInviting expressions of interest from various pharma companies for\neducational grant/sponsorship\nApplication to Maharashtra

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-11(1), PUNE, PUNE vs. MAHARASHTRA CRICKET ASSOCIATION, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical\npurposes

short) erred in holding the\nreceipt of subsidy/ grant from the BCCI by the assessee as a capital\nreceipt, without appreciating the facts of the case and the landmark\ndecision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in respect of Sports\nAssociations in ACIT(E) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority\nin Civil Appeal No. 21762 Of 2017 dated

BRAHMAN SABHA KARVEER,MAHARASHTRA vs. CIT EXEMPTION PUNE, CIT EXEMPTION PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Satbeer Singh Godara

short “the Act”). Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte. 2. We note with the able assistance coming from the department’s side represented by the learned DR that the CIT(E) herein has declined the assessee’s sec.80G registration 2 ITA.No.795/PUN./2024 application filed on 20.03.2024 mainly on the ground

AVI FOUNDATION,NAGPUR vs. THE HONORABLE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PUNE, PUNE

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Satbeer Singh Godara

short “the Act”). Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It appears to have filed it’s adjournment application which stands rejected. 2 ITA.Nos.1345 & 1369/PUN./2023 2. Ld. CIT-DR points-out at the outset that the assessee has preferred instant twin appeals against the very impugned order passed by the CIT-(E) rejecting it’s sec.80G

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(2),, PUNE vs. M/S SINHGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY (TRUST), PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl. It(Ss)A No./ Name Of Appellant Name Of Respondent Asst. No.

short] dated 26.04.2017 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2014-15 respectively. 2. Since the identical facts and issues are involved in all above captioned cross appeals, therefore, we proceed to dispose of the same by this common order. 3. The brief factual background of the case is that the appellant society is a Trust, namely, M/s. Sinhagad Technical