SMT. SUMANDEVI DINESHKUMAR TULSYAN,,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(5),, NASHIK

section 12A of the Securities Contracts\n(Regulation) Act, 1956] has clearly held that Shri Vijay Kumar Jain has been\ninvolved in the manipulation of the share price of this listed company and has\nmanipulated so as to utilize this scrip to arrange entry of bogus long term capital\ngains and has subsequently restrained Shri Vijay Kumar Jain from accessing

PUNE MATHADI HAMAL AND OTHER MANUAL WORKERS BOARD,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1012/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Pune Mathadihamal & Other The Income Tax Manual Workers Board, V Officer, Shramashakti Bhavan, S Ward-5(1), Pune. Coomercial Plot No.1, Market Yard, Pune – 411037. Pan: Aaalp0097L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Vipul Joshi – Ar Revenue By Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari & Shri Rajesh Gawali– Dr’S Date Of Hearing 17/04/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 27/06/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Orders Of Ld.Commissionerof Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Under Section 250 Of The Act Dated 14.07.2023 :

capital gains. Once this principle was accepted and consistently applied and followed, the Revenue was bound by it. Unless of course it wanted to change the practice without any change in law or change in facts therein, the basis for the change in practice should have been mentioned either in the assessment order or atleast pointed out to the Tribunal

SINHAGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,PUNE vs. PCIT(CENTRAL), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoresinhagad Technical Education Society Pcit (Central), Pune Smt. Khilare Marg, Off Karve Road, Vs. Pune – 411004 Pan: Aabts9900Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Suhas Bora & Miss Sampada Ingale Department By : Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari - Cit Date Of Hearing : 25-03-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-05-2025 O R D E R

gains of business which is not incidental to the attainment of its objectives or separate books of account are not maintained by such trust or institution in respect of the business which is incidental to the attainment of its objectives; or c) The trust or institution has applied any part of its income from the property held under a trust

M.M. PATEL PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST,SOLAPUR vs. PCIT- CENTRAL, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

capitation fees.\nFurther in the reply dated 20.04.2024, it was submitted that\nthere is no provision for cancellation of registration u/s.12A of the\nAct retrospectively since section 12AB has come into operation\nfrom 01.04.2021. Further vide reply dated 26.03.2024, assessee\nstated that the trust is running a Medical College, Charitable\nHospital and Research Centre as per the objects

AMIT BHASKARRAO SANAP,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -3, , AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Dismissed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.78/Pun/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Amit Bhaskarrao Sanap, The Assistant A-2, N-4, Cidco, Aurangabad, Vs Commissioner Of Income Maharashtra – 431001. Tax, Circle-3, Aurangabad. Pan: Auips 4177 L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri S P Walimbe & Shri Arvind Desai – Dr Date Of Hearing 25/07/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 19/10/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-2, Aurangabad, Dated 13.11.2018 For The A.Y. 2015-16. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Order Of The Learned Commissioner (A), Aurangabad Confirming The Addition Of Rs.1,93.17.241/- Made By The A.O. In Computing The Income U/S 56 Instead Of Exempt U S. 10(38) Of The Act Of The Appellant Is Contrary To Law & Facts Of The Case.

12A read with section 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 for the predicate offences. -Enforcement Directorate should then be informed to take action under Prevention of Money Laundering Act for the predicate offences. 16 In his reply the assessee has mainly contended that since the purchase was made by cheque payment and shares were allotted

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

capital gains. 10. The second issue which was considered by Assessing Officer was transfer premium, wherein on transfer of any plot by original owner, transfer premium was to be paid before transferring the term of lease in respect of balance period available of the lease period. The assessee had charged 50% of amount charged by earlier lessee

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

capital gains. 10. The second issue which was considered by Assessing Officer was transfer premium, wherein on transfer of any plot by original owner, transfer premium was to be paid before transferring the term of lease in respect of balance period available of the lease period. The assessee had charged 50% of amount charged by earlier lessee

INCOME-TAX OFFICER vs. PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

capital gains. 10. The second issue which was considered by Assessing Officer was transfer premium, wherein on transfer of any plot by original owner, transfer premium was to be paid before transferring the term of lease in respect of balance period available of the lease period. The assessee had charged 50% of amount charged by earlier lessee

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

capital gains. 10. The second issue which was considered by Assessing Officer was transfer premium, wherein on transfer of any plot by original owner, transfer premium was to be paid before transferring the term of lease in respect of balance period available of the lease period. The assessee had charged 50% of amount charged by earlier lessee

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

capital gains. 10. The second issue which was considered by Assessing Officer was transfer premium, wherein on transfer of any plot by original owner, transfer premium was to be paid before transferring the term of lease in respect of balance period available of the lease period. The assessee had charged 50% of amount charged by earlier lessee

INCOME-TAX OFFICER vs. PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

capital gains. 10. The second issue which was considered by Assessing Officer was transfer premium, wherein on transfer of any plot by original owner, transfer premium was to be paid before transferring the term of lease in respect of balance period available of the lease period. The assessee had charged 50% of amount charged by earlier lessee

SHREE CHAITANYA-RAM FOUNDATION,BAVDHAN vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

section 12A(1)(ac)(vi) empowers the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to condone delay if they find that there was reasonable cause in not filing application within prescribed time limit. Accordingly the matter was remanded back to the file of the CIT(Exemption) with a direction to treat the application as filed within time and decide the issue afresh

SHREE CHAITANYA-RAM FOUNDATION,BAVDHAN PUNE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

section 12A(1)(ac)(vi) empowers the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to condone delay if they find that there was reasonable cause in not filing application within prescribed time limit. Accordingly the matter was remanded back to the file of the CIT(Exemption) with a direction to treat the application as filed within time and decide the issue afresh

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE,PUNE vs. MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF SECONDARY & HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2022-23

capital gains 7 CO No.19/PUN/2025 from sale of shares u/s 10 but by mistake, omitted to exclude them, Commissioner should rectify the return and revision could not be denied. 9. Referring to the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Smt. Ashrafi Devi Shiksha Samiti vs. ITO reported in (2025) 172 taxmann.com 568 (Delhi-Trib

AGRA OBSTETRICAL AND GYNAECOLOGICAL SOCIETY,AGRA vs. PCIT, CENTRAL, PUNE

capitation fees are merely based on the statement of\nemployees which have been subsequently retracted and the Pendrive\nand loose document found at the residential premises of employee has\nalso been retracted at the subsequent stage and that the Managing\nTrustee of the assessee trust has denied to be indulged into any of such\nalleged transaction in the statement given

DADASAHEB TIRODKAR SHAIKSHANIK ACADEMY,SINDHUDURG vs. ITOD EXEMPTION WARD, KOLHAPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

section 13B\n12b\n13\nIncome not forming part of item no. 7 and 11 above\ni\nIncome from house property (3b of Schedule HP) (enter nil if loss)\n131\n0\nii\nProfits and gains of business or profession [as per item no. E 35 of schedule BP)\n13\n0\nin\nIncome under the head Capital Gains\na\nShort term

AIDS SOCIETY OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE

capitation fees are merely based on the statement of employees which have been subsequently retracted and the Pendrive and loose document found at the residential premises of employee has also been retracted at the subsequent stage and that the Managing Trustee of the assessee trust has denied to be indulged into any of such alleged transaction in the statement given

M/S. MARATHWADA AUTO CLUSTER,,AURANGABAD vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER ,,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am

12A(2) Registration and Income Computation 3 A.Y.2012-13 provisions being applicable for earlier pending proceedings Appellant, therefore, prays for computation of Income under Sec. 11, 12 of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. As per the understanding and terms of the Government Grants, the unspent grants be invested in fixed deposit. The interest thereon will be part of the grant